- Feb 14, 2021
- 22,233
- 9,699
- 113
- 58
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
I reject ECT, eternal conscious torment. The wages of sin is death. Judgement Day results in Second Death. It is the fire that burns eternally not people.
Conversation with An Atheist
- Thread starter Wrangler
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Annihilation - I've yet to be convinced that isn't the case
eg
This guy has a PhD in theology ?
10 min watch, final in a series
RLT63
Well-Known Member
I was an atheist. Quantum physics set me on the path to Jesus
As a young atheist, he saw the universe as one big machine Then he studied quantum physics, read the New Testament for the first time, and noticed something startling Jesus talked like a quantum
www.christianpost.com
Quantum physics turns logic on its head. Suddenly and enigmatically, the solid, material world becomes a ghostly cloud of probabilities, supernatural behavior becomes natural, and complete opposites become unified realities.
It’s precisely that utterly illogical strangeness that seized my attention when I read the New Testament for the first time. I could scarcely believe it! This alleged, Iron-Age Jesus of Nazareth spoke like a modern-day quantum physicist.
Unlike the instructions on how to live from any other sacred figure I’d ever read (by then, I had immersed myself in all the major religions), Jesus’s teachings turned logic on its head. During His Sermon on the Mount, for example, he admonished the crowd to love their enemies, that in order to live they first must die, that the first among them were, in fact, the last, and on and on.
This quantum-like language is what made me rise to the bait. It’s what caused me to further investigate Christianity with an open, analytical mind.
Last edited:
These comparisons are extremely loose and definitely retrospective.I was an atheist. Quantum physics set me on the path to Jesus
As a young atheist, he saw the universe as one big machine Then he studied quantum physics, read the New Testament for the first time, and noticed something startling Jesus talked like a quantum
Quantum physics turns logic on its head. Suddenly and enigmatically, the solid, material world becomes a ghostly cloud of probabilities, supernatural behavior becomes natural, and complete opposites become unified realities.
It’s precisely that utterly illogical strangeness that seized my attention when I read the New Testament for the first time. I could scarcely believe it! This alleged, Iron-Age Jesus of Nazareth spoke like a modern-day quantum physicist.
Unlike the instructions on how to live from any other sacred figure I’d ever read (by then, I had immersed myself in all the major religions), Jesus’s teachings turned logic on its head. During His Sermon on the Mount, for example, he admonished the crowd to love their enemies, that in order to live they first must die, that the first among them were, in fact, the last, and on and on.
This quantum-like language is what made me rise to the bait. It’s what caused me to further investigate Christianity with an open, analytical mind.
dak
Well-Known Member
- Feb 9, 2013
- 1,564
- 208
- 63
- Faith
- Other Faith
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
I was an atheist. Quantum physics set me on the path to Jesus
As a young atheist, he saw the universe as one big machine Then he studied quantum physics, read the New Testament for the first time, and noticed something startling Jesus talked like a quantum
Quantum physics turns logic on its head. Suddenly and enigmatically, the solid, material world becomes a ghostly cloud of probabilities, supernatural behavior becomes natural, and complete opposites become unified realities.
It’s precisely that utterly illogical strangeness that seized my attention when I read the New Testament for the first time. I could scarcely believe it! This alleged, Iron-Age Jesus of Nazareth spoke like a modern-day quantum physicist.
Unlike the instructions on how to live from any other sacred figure I’d ever read (by then, I had immersed myself in all the major religions), Jesus’s teachings turned logic on its head. During His Sermon on the Mount, for example, he admonished the crowd to love their enemies, that in order to live they first must die, that the first among them were, in fact, the last, and on and on.
This quantum-like language is what made me rise to the bait. It’s what caused me to further investigate Christianity with an open, analytical mind.
"that in order to live they first must die"...
As you surely know, the words of Elohim are Spirit, and as even Paul says, the Torah is spiritual, (Rom 7:14a). The Master teaches us how to die in the manner which is pleasing to the Father, and it is absolutely not physical death: it is the death of the old man nature. This language is also found in the Prophets, but not fully expounded until the Testimony of the Master in the Gospel accounts expounds it all, (at the very least, all things necessary to understand the supernal and spiritual ways of the Father so that we may walk pleasing unto Him). This language is even included in the New-Renewed Covenant as follows:
Jeremiah 31:26-31 KJV
26 Upon this I awaked, and beheld; and my sleep was sweet unto me.
27 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.
28 And it shall come to pass, that like as I have watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict; so will I watch over them, to build, and to plant, saith the LORD.
29 In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge.
30 But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge.
31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
It is appointed unto men once to die, (of course women too, all mankind), then comes the judgment: so what is the answer to the dilemma in the above highlighted verse according to the Meshiah? One must take up his or her own stake and follow him, and that obviously means his Testimony and the understanding of his teachings, (which are spiritual, John 6:63, not physical).
Therefore die now: for the flesh profits nothing, (John 6:63), but if one refuses and rather waits until the carcass dies, then the same will die with the carcass, never having been set right in the eyes of the Creator. Therefore if your right eye is always wandering off the narrow path toward the ditch, pluck it out and cast it from you: if your right hand offends you, cut it off and cast it from you, and if your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and cast it from you, etc., etc.
Paul's answer is the same, Mortify or put to death our members upon-concerning the earth, (things of below), Mortify or put to death the deeds of the body, (physical, carnal, and the natural-minded things of below), and walk according to the Spirit, (of the Testimony of the Meshiah), in all of our understanding: for the Testimony of the Meshiah was given to him from above, from the heavens, from the Father, (John 3:27-34), and the Father has sealed that Testimony by voice from the heavens, (according to the Testimonies), and the words therefore shall never pass away, just as the Master says in the Olivet Discourse.
- Feb 14, 2021
- 22,233
- 9,699
- 113
- 58
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
Yet, comparing the illogic of quantum mechanics to Jesus‘ teachings is correct, yes?
Poor Macu needs to focus on anything that distracts him from his belief that there is NOTHING after death & that he will never see deceased loved ones again
The intersection of Plato’s philosophy and quantum physics centers on the idea that the fundamental fabric of the universe is not solid matter, but rather immaterial, abstract, and mathematical.
Key Connections
Key Connections
- Immaterial Reality (Platonic Idealism vs. Materialism): Early Greek atomists like Democritus argued that hard, physical matter is the base of reality. However, quantum mechanics revealed that subatomic particles lack fixed shapes or solidness, existing instead as probability waves, energy fields, and mathematical descriptions—leading pioneers like Werner Heisenberg to suggest that modern physics leans toward Plato’s realm of ideal forms rather than crude materialism.
- Plato’s Cave and Quantum Superposition: Analogies are frequently drawn between Plato’s Allegory of the Cave and quantum phenomena. In the cave, prisoners see only flickering shadows of a higher, unseen reality; in quantum mechanics, unobserved particles exist in a non-physical state of superposition (a mix of potentials) until a measurement forces a "collapse" into a single, definite outcome.
- Abstract Mathematical Entities: Quantum mechanics deals with entities (like wave functions and photons) that no one has ever "seen" directly as physical objects, yet scientists treat them as real because they exist consistently within an abstract mathematical framework—mirroring Plato’s view of abstract Ideas.
Plato’s View of the Gods
• Rejection of Homeric Myths: Plato strongly criticized traditional poets like Homer and Hesiod. He argued that stories showing Zeus, Hera, and other Olympians lying, stealing, committing adultery, or feeling petty human emotions (like jealousy and rage) were false and harmful.
• The Divine Must Be Good: In works like the Republic, Plato insisted that a true god or divine being must be completely good, unchanging, truthful, and the cause of only good things—never evil or deception.
• The Supreme Good (The Demiurge / Form of the Good): Plato often pointed toward a supreme, ultimate principle or rational creator (such as the Demiurgos in the Timaeus or the Form of the Good) that ordered the universe.
• Acceptance of Polytheism: Plato still acknowledged and accepted traditional Greek gods and lesser divine or spiritual beings, viewing them as real, immortal, and morally pure executors of divine order. He did not advocate for abolishing civic worship or temple rituals.
• Rejection of Homeric Myths: Plato strongly criticized traditional poets like Homer and Hesiod. He argued that stories showing Zeus, Hera, and other Olympians lying, stealing, committing adultery, or feeling petty human emotions (like jealousy and rage) were false and harmful.
• The Divine Must Be Good: In works like the Republic, Plato insisted that a true god or divine being must be completely good, unchanging, truthful, and the cause of only good things—never evil or deception.
• The Supreme Good (The Demiurge / Form of the Good): Plato often pointed toward a supreme, ultimate principle or rational creator (such as the Demiurgos in the Timaeus or the Form of the Good) that ordered the universe.
• Acceptance of Polytheism: Plato still acknowledged and accepted traditional Greek gods and lesser divine or spiritual beings, viewing them as real, immortal, and morally pure executors of divine order. He did not advocate for abolishing civic worship or temple rituals.
- Feb 14, 2021
- 22,233
- 9,699
- 113
- 58
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
Your ‘loose connection’ is a Strawman. There is no need to invoke Plato, who had no knowledge of quantum mechanics that @RLT63 linked. It’s not my argument. I am not really making the argument but sharing the experience, for I am the proof that the Christian God exists and loves us.
I already made the analogy to accepting the testimony of 100 people witnesses the driver go through the read light.
amigo de christo
Well-Known Member
verily i do bring a reminder to us all .
What did JESUS say to do to those who rejected HIM , his gosple .
What did paul say to do IF a heretick after the first or second admonition wont repent . REJEcT such .
SO now i have a question for you .
Do feel free to test it by asking him yourself .
Does this atheist embrace the one true gospel of JESUS CHRIST .
I TROW NOT . He has been rejecting it all along .
Now if that seems hard to believe or if one wants to beleive this atheist does not reject
JESUS as the CHRIST and believes not that GOD did rise him from the dead ,
WELL THEN YOU ASK HIM . I think the cliam of being an athiest PROVES HE rejectes
JESUS the CHRIST . And yet over and ov er again everyone wants to keep on
trying to debate him . IF one hears NOT the gospel , THEY WILL NOT hear the truth you bring them .