Coronavirus spreading

[reformed1689]

This is rather vague. Exactly who exactly told what exactly what lie?

The one where they said Trump lied that Google was making a COVID19 site.

 

[Giuliano]

Also, good article on why nobody trusts (or should trust) the mainstream media: 'Why No One Trusts Media': NYT Reporters Circulate Misleading Trump Quote on Wuhan Coronavirus

If no one trusts the media, why are you raising such a fuss? That headline, by itself, is comical.

Now about that quote. What did he really mean? "“Respirators, ventilators, all of the equipment — try getting it yourselves. We will be backing you, but try getting it yourselves. Point of sales, much better, much more direct if you can get it yourself.” What does "will be backing you" mean? Giving them moral support? Scrounging up some respirators and ventilators? How many of those? How much of "all the equipment" can the federal government be giving people to "back" them?

The statement was ridiculous. It would be like me telling a homeless person, "Food and shelter? Try getting it yourself. I'll be backing you but try getting it yourself." It's a nothing statement. If I told him exactly what help I would provide, that would tell him what other things he needed to look for elsewhere. Trump appeared to me to be saying, "I don't know what we have or when we'll have anything to give you. Don't count on us. Help yourselves; but of course, if we do get some things, we'll help you out."

 

[Giuliano]

The one where they said Trump lied that Google was making a COVID19 site.

Who is "they"? You continue to be extremely vague.

 

[Giuliano]

You can't "catch" what you already have. Perhaps you need to "catch" the cure, -- called REALITY.

Bobby Jo

You are someone who seems to live in a world of his own imagination. If people doesn't agree with your imaginary world, you think they have trouble dealing with reality.

 

[Giuliano]

At the same time, Trump has not had proper advice about a proper wall, therefore what you see are pictures of an inadequate fence. Again, his advisers have been sabotaging his agenda. A proper solid wall (including a barrier to all tunnels), with all defensive and offensive equipment in place, could have prevented not only illegals, but all kinds of infectious diseases from coming North. Those caravans would have stopped had they seen a real wall in place.

Now it's Trump's advisers who are undermining him? I wonder why he keeps picking such back-stabbing incompetent people to work for him.

I remind you that Mexico has few coronavirus cases. The virus did not enter the US from Mexico. Do try to make sense.

 

[reformed1689]

If no one trusts the media, why are you raising such a fuss? That headline, by itself, is comical.

Now about that quote. What did he really mean? "“Respirators, ventilators, all of the equipment — try getting it yourselves. We will be backing you, but try getting it yourselves. Point of sales, much better, much more direct if you can get it yourself.” What does "will be backing you" mean? Giving them moral support? Scrounging up some respirators and ventilators? How many of those? How much of "all the equipment" can the federal government be giving people to "back" them?

The statement was ridiculous. It would be like me telling a homeless person, "Food and shelter? Try getting it yourself. I'll be backing you but try getting it yourself." It's a nothing statement. If I told him exactly what help I would provide, that would tell him what other things he needed to look for elsewhere. Trump appeared to me to be saying, "I don't know what we have or when we'll have anything to give you. Don't count on us. Help yourselves; but of course, if we do get some things, we'll help you out."

Don't be stupid. Any idiot can understand what the POTUS meant. He means try getting it yourself through your private channels first because the federal government might take a while. Not hard to understand at all.

 

[reformed1689]

Who is "they"? You continue to be extremely vague.

Just do a Google search for "trump lied about google"

 

[Giuliano]

Let's see what the "stable genius" said back in 2018. Impeaching him could lead to the stock market crashing. . . .

What fear mongering in an attempt to frighten Democrats from impeaching him. "Threaten me with impeachment and you will be sorry -- Wall Street will collapse." He was wrong, of course. Now we saw Wall Street collapse and it had nothing to do with the impeachment. Nothing.

Remember when Trump took credit for the rise in the stock market?

I think he could take a little credit, but there were other factors too. Certainly I wouldn't blame Trump now for the crash -- maybe he could have handled things better, maybe he contributed to it -- but I'm not going to say he alone did it or was even the main reason.

What I find interesting is that when things go well, he wants to crow and take credit. When things go sour, it's always someone else's fault. Both are exaggerations.

 

[Giuliano]

Just do a Google search for "trump lied about google"

I did google "Trump" "google" and "coronavirus". I didn't find what you claimed. I'm not saying it's not there -- but I can't find it. You can't provide any evidence? Do you expect people to believe something because you say so? If you have credible information, tell us where you found it.

 

[reformed1689]

I did google "Trump" "google" and "coronavirus". I didn't find what you claimed. I'm not saying it's not there -- but I can't find it. You can't provide any evidence? Do you expect people to believe something because you say so? If you have credible information, tell us where you found it.

I literally told you the exact search to put in...

 

[Giuliano]

Don't be stupid. Any idiot can understand what the POTUS meant. He means try getting it yourself through your private channels first because the federal government might take a while. Not hard to understand at all.

Don't be stupid. Any idiot can understand what the POTUS meant. He means try getting it yourself through your private channels first because the federal government might take a while. Not hard to understand at all.

So the tweet from the New York Times reporter wasn't all that wrong.

“Respirators, ventilators, all of the equipment — try getting it yourselves,” Mr. Trump told the governors during the conference call. via @jmartNYT https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/world/coronavirus-news.html …

So why the complaining about the lack of context? Do you think the reporter should have gone on at length to explain how unprepared the Trump administration was?

 

[Giuliano]

I literally told you the exact search to put in...

Why so reluctant to share your sources?

The first article I found was from Vox.

https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/3/15/21180518/coronavirus-google-verily-website-testing-trump

In a bold declaration on Friday, Trump said that “Google has 1,700 engineers working on” a website that would help people figure out if they needed a coronavirus test and to direct them to testing sites. As we now know, this statement was not entirely true. The reality of Google’s role in addressing the coronavirus outbreak is more complex and, in some ways, more productive.

Within an hour of the president’s Rose Garden speech on Friday, the company’s press team pushed back against Trump’s announcement and tweeted a statement from Verily, drawing a distinction between the two companies and clarifying that the Verily site was only nearing a testing phase, rather than being almost ready to launch.

This is actually a generous depiction of the truth behind the Trump declaration. According to the New York Times, the plan for Verily to build a website to help with coronavirus testing was “in its infancy.” And Verily only has about 1,000 employees. The 1,700 number that Trump claimed in his speech actually refers to the number of Google engineers who, the Thursday before Trump’s speech, filled out a form volunteering to help Verily with its coronavirus triage site in the coming “days and weeks.” Even then, the Verily project was only meant to be used by health care workers.

I also found this:

Despite Trump’s claims, Google isn’t building the coronavirus screening site — and it’s not ready – TechCrunch

In a press conference at the White House, President Trump today announced that 1,700 Google engineers were working on a coronavirus screening site. That site was supposedly the first step in a new screening process that would lead people from figuring out if their symptoms warranted more testing to the location of new “drive through” testing stations. But Trump was wrong. This screening site isn’t being developed by Google . Instead, it’s being built by Verily, Alphabet’s life science division — and it’s not ready to launch yet either.

 

[69chapels]

Coronavirus Update

(want to thank the police department for euthanasia of the police officer to remedy the police department's solicitation with me in the darby school shooting, and their involvement) (this will ensure that I do not talk, or seek to reveal the identities of the minorities officers involved) (I wanted to see at least two philadelphia policers dead, but my interests maybe resolved with that, right now) (very good on the quick response too)

You are viewing the Human Genome in a sphere arrangement. Do you seen the indentation location @ 120 to 140 ................ Coronavirus Modifies the location around 190.

Until that is understood and fixed, nobody with Coronavirus Confirmed can be considered cured versus, dormant status.................You have to kill the people identified as infected so they do not spread, that is the only option. Your position will evolve on the coronavirus soon, perhaps by the end of this year 2020 when we see the 2nd variant, and possible mass deaths.

At this level, this is only a hypothesis, based on, offshore research.
(the "Nebra Sky Disk" references two genome locations, so people are really being marked for death) (then they die) (so its like that) (if your not ready to kill people off then, you need to just let it be)

 

[Justadude]

CB allows this sort of stuff? Isn't allowing someone to post about wanting to see cops dead risky for CB?

 

[reformed1689]

So the tweet from the New York Times reporter wasn't all that wrong.

“Respirators, ventilators, all of the equipment — try getting it yourselves,” Mr. Trump told the governors during the conference call. via @jmartNYT https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/world/coronavirus-news.html …

So why the complaining about the lack of context? Do you think the reporter should have gone on at length to explain how unprepared the Trump administration was?

OH brother...

 

[reformed1689]

Why so reluctant to share your sources?

The first article I found was from Vox.

https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/3/15/21180518/coronavirus-google-verily-website-testing-trump

In a bold declaration on Friday, Trump said that “Google has 1,700 engineers working on” a website that would help people figure out if they needed a coronavirus test and to direct them to testing sites. As we now know, this statement was not entirely true. The reality of Google’s role in addressing the coronavirus outbreak is more complex and, in some ways, more productive.

Within an hour of the president’s Rose Garden speech on Friday, the company’s press team pushed back against Trump’s announcement and tweeted a statement from Verily, drawing a distinction between the two companies and clarifying that the Verily site was only nearing a testing phase, rather than being almost ready to launch.

This is actually a generous depiction of the truth behind the Trump declaration. According to the New York Times, the plan for Verily to build a website to help with coronavirus testing was “in its infancy.” And Verily only has about 1,000 employees. The 1,700 number that Trump claimed in his speech actually refers to the number of Google engineers who, the Thursday before Trump’s speech, filled out a form volunteering to help Verily with its coronavirus triage site in the coming “days and weeks.” Even then, the Verily project was only meant to be used by health care workers.

I also found this:

Despite Trump’s claims, Google isn’t building the coronavirus screening site — and it’s not ready – TechCrunch

In a press conference at the White House, President Trump today announced that 1,700 Google engineers were working on a coronavirus screening site. That site was supposedly the first step in a new screening process that would lead people from figuring out if their symptoms warranted more testing to the location of new “drive through” testing stations. But Trump was wrong. This screening site isn’t being developed by Google . Instead, it’s being built by Verily, Alphabet’s life science division — and it’s not ready to launch yet either.

Good, now go and look at the press conference from Sunday and he shows Google actually substantiated his claim.

 

[Preacher4Truth]

So the tweet from the New York Times reporter wasn't all that wrong.

“Respirators, ventilators, all of the equipment — try getting it yourselves,” Mr. Trump told the governors during the conference call. via @jmartNYT https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/world/coronavirus-news.html …

So why the complaining about the lack of context? Do you think the reporter should have gone on at length to explain how unprepared the Trump administration was?

Did you happen to listen to the exchange in its context? If you did (and no you haven't) you'd know the above to be a misrepresentation. The libelous link served to suffice your hate, it quenched what you desired. That you believed the fakenews link proves you never heard what was actually said.

 

[Yehren]

President Donald Trump and his campaign promoted a dishonestly edited video on Saturday that wrongly made it seem as if Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden had accidentally endorsed Trump.

The clip, which was viewed more than 5.8 million times and retweeted more than 34,000 times as of Sunday morning at 10 AM, showed Biden struggling with a line in his Saturday speech in Kansas City, Missouri, then saying, "Excuse me. We can only re-elect Donald Trump."

But the clip was edited to cut out the second part of Biden's sentence. What the former vice president actually said was this: "Excuse me. We can only re-elect Donald Trump if in fact we get engaged in this circular firing squad here. It's gotta be a positive campaign." Biden had called for an end to "negative attacks" in his primary contest with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Trump retweeted the dishonestly edited clip late Saturday night, sharing a version tweeted by White House social media director Dan Scavino -- who incorrectly said the video was taken in St. Louis, where Biden spoke earlier on Saturday. (Biden had delivered another version of the line in the St. Louis speech.)
Trump and his campaign promote dishonestly edited Biden video - CNNPolitics

From this, we get two messages:
1. Trump and his campaign are shameless hypocrites.
2. Trump is positively terrified of Biden.

 

[Giuliano]

Good, now go and look at the press conference from Sunday and he shows Google actually substantiated his claim.

I did check it out. Google agreed later to form some of partnership, but that was after what Trump talked. I'm tired of you telling me what to do, too. If you want me to read something, give the link. Stop acting as if I'm your obedient servant.

 

[Giuliano]

Did you happen to listen to the exchange in its context? If you did (and no you haven't) you'd know the above to be a misrepresentation. The libelous link served to suffice your hate, it quenched what you desired. That you believed the fakenews link proves you never heard what was actually said.

Lots of hot language and name-calling in that post. You got in a few insult of me too, saying I had hate. You got anything else to offer?

As for the "fakenews site" link? Take that up with Reformed. He gave it, not me, remember in post #636? Or are you too losing your mind? That link was:

'Why No One Trusts Media': NYT Reporters Circulate Misleading Trump Quote on Wuhan Coronavirus