stunnedbygrace
Well-Known Member
Or as Epi likes to say, there are ditches on both sides of a road.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
When you say "all the tension of not understanding", I don't understand what you mean, lol.
It is only through that very tension that I ever DO understand anything.
It's sort of like walking on a tightrope. In the balance, there's no tension. Both sides of the pole are still because you have it in the middle. If you move more to either side of the pole with your grip, your weight favors to one side or the other, and you have lost that calm balance and will fall.
The weight on one side is I will never leave or forsake you. The weight on the other side is to remain in trust (abide) or you will be cut off. You can't walk correctly without the tension and weight of both sides of the pole.
I didn't feel any disrespect from you...I was just conversing.
I can only see where Paul lived by the faith of another in this verse. What theological statement was paul making?
I came back this morning to read this thread again. I do that a lot with your threads. :)
Can I live by the faith of another?
What does faith mean? To me, it means: trusting God.
So then, to say I live by the faith of Jesus, to me this means: Jesus trusted God and I live by this trust He had in God. But that doesn't make any sense to me.
I understand that Jesus, who is God, became human, and that after He became human He had to rely on God for everything. Yes, it sounds bizarre, but the opening of John tells us that Jesus was and is God.
The point I snag on is when people say, I don't live by my own trust in God but I live by Jesus' trust in God. It falls apart for me there and I can't make sense of it.
I am the one who has to learn the obedience of trust. Many times a day I exercise my trust. For example, when it looks like I should panic, I have to refuse that and say: no, I trust Him. He said not to worry about money, He said He knows what I need and will see to it.
So how is that me living by Jesus's trust in God? It seems I am the one who has to trust Him and learn the obedience of that trust rather than painic and unbelief of what He has said. I have to learn to trust, no matter what things look like to me.
Have I made sense here?
I don't know, that might make sense to others...Jesus is God. I live by Jesus' trust in Himself? Doesn't make sense to me. My mind can't grasp it.
Truly trusting in God is hard for many I think. There is such a strong desire in man to seek the assurance from one's self, to be able to look at one's self, and say, See! I'm righteous! I live a good life! So I hope God will receive me.Thanks for commenting. Compared to all scripture we have that is a real stretch to say he won't remain in you, (my paraphrase) unless you do something to keep me. What do you do with all the scriptures? I'll never leave you nor forsake you" is really a statement people cannot get around. I have often wondered why Christians have such a hard time accepting their salvation? It is a bit of a mystery for the knowledge of good and evil.
That's not what Paul says.If Paul describes a proximity to Christ he experienced that doesn't make it automatic for all his readers. It is religion that does this sort of thing.
Is it that trust sounds too simple to be true? Or is it that trust sounds like weakness to us? Like...no, I would rather trust in my own hopes and plans than give up all my care for whatever He might want for me?
Just so.The joy in you will increase when you see there are no “tensions” in truth.
This is a good example, but when you look at it, both cannot be true.The weight on one side is I will never leave or forsake you. The weight on the other side is to remain in trust (abide) or you will be cut off. You can't walk correctly without the tension and weight of both sides of the pole.
They Are both true, but they aren't true in a way that conflicts with each other. If there isn't harmony, then a full understanding is not reached, in my opinion.He said both things. You say they can't both be true. So you have a problem. I say they are both true. You say they can't both be true. You can continue the way you are going, but it is not the right way.
Just so.
I've found these perceived conflicts are resolved by having a correct understanding. Perceived conflict, what so many call "tension", for a softer word, show the need for deeper study.
Much love!