Brother Mike;72226]Dear Brother epistemanaicThank you for you considerations in responding with your findings on the Gifts of the Spirit. I read your post over several times. If I am wrong said:
I was completely confounded. [/COLOR]The Brother said nothing else but turned around and walked away. There was power in his voice, something I could not explain. It was enough to make me throw my letter I started that night, away. Two days latter I got that letter from home, It was filled with lots of hurt on how I upset my family, and they were in the process of trying to forgive me. I knew then, that I wanted the maturity and things those other brothers had with God. I also started to entertain the idea that I should be speaking in those tongues. If we believe on his name, we shall speak in new tongues. (Mark 16) I don't know why it took months to open my eyes to the Power of the Holy Ghost. I had lots of other teaching in me. I am just Glad I did. If I may address some things you posted. Now how would you know? Does your church do this often, or is this just an assumption based on what you have heard and not experienced for any length of time. I have been in service where someone has stood up and just stated to speak tongues. Interupting the whole thing. Unbiblical? yep, but your always going to have people that are not mature.You need to get your oppinion from those that actually operate in the Gifts of the Spirit and not the World of science so falsely called. It is this very reasoning that we are told Moses crossed he RED SEA, but it was just a puddle. This is why we are Told that the walls of Jerico were brought down by Loud sound vibrations, and not by the power of God. This is why we are told that Jesus could not have been raised from the dead (That does not happen) but was burried somewhere in a box with his name on it. These gifts are spiritual!!! Not to undertood with conventional wisdom of man, and Paul clearly stated that our mind would not understand what we have said. The sound may sound the same over and over with some that pray in tongues, it does not mean the sound, not being the excate same had a different meaning, though it appears to be the same word with natural hearing. I agree Brother, it must line up with Scripture!!! However there is more to your life, that scripture did not cover. The sheep know his voice, and a child of God is led by the Spirit of God. God has something to say to you!!!My son sick with very high fevor, and 4 different bacteria, 2 which can kill. Was getting no better in ICU. He was also not responding to antibacterial drip. The Doctors were confused and were running every test they could to save him. I could not be with him, I was on Parole. My wife called me and told me that things were getting worse, my sons fevor hit 106, and they were trying their best to keep it down. My wife told me to ask God for wisdom and call her back.I went to the Lord praying in tongues, and got a word of knowledge. My son had a pick line placed in his arm for Chemo treatment. The Lord told me to have the doctors take that pick line out of his arm right away. I called back my wife and told her to tell the doctors to remove my sons pick line. She got a nurse and told the doctors, but they insisted that they have run 2 test on that pick line, and assured her that was not the problem. She was adamit, and they went ahead and removed the whole line from my sons arm. After removing the pick line and running test they found the cause of the Bacteria. So you see Brother it's not just to compare to scripture, it's for your family and own Good. My hope is that you will at least just ask God to show you these things if any are true. Give God a chance to bless you. Don't discount these things, but give God an opertunity and be open to them. If you shut these things off, God won't bother you with it, and you will miss a lot of awesome blessing. God bless you and Jesus Is Lord!!!
hey Mike... thank you for your heartfelt response... I appreciate your testimony...first, you are right, I am not a total cessationist, eg of those who believe that all the gifts of the spirit have ceased... I am of a position called "open but cautious"... knwing that we live in a creation where God can and does intereven in the world, sometimes quite miraculously... but I am extremely doubful concerning modern tongues speaking as being a true manifestation of the tongues that occurred during the early church...however I do not see the connection between what the brother who did not speak to you too much saying with you suddenly deciding that you needed to speak in tongues... one of the things that bothers me most about this issue is that people seem to forget that the gifts of the Spirit are given by God, sovereignly, as He sees fit... yes you can pray for the gifts but the bible explicitly says 1Co 12:7-11 ESV To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. (8) To one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, (9) to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, (10) to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. (11)
All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills.Paul continues... 1Co 12:28-30 ESV And
God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. (29) Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? (30) Do all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?"elsewhere he says Eph 4:11 ESV And
he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers,"God has appointed, God is the one who gives gifts according to His wisdom... not man... and many seem to miss the rhetorical question that Paul asks here in 1 Cor. 12:29 ... he asks: will all be apostles?... teachers? ... will all speak in tonues...? etc.. Well the answer to that question is obviously no. So no matter what I hppen to believe about the modern phenomena of tongues speaking (which I think is better termed "ecstatic utterances) the Charismatic/Word of Faith/Pentecostals movement is absolutely wrong in maintaining that everyone will speak in tongues. Secondly I believe that Paul when he speaks of "tongues" he is referring to actual known languages, not to ecstatic utterances... which is the practice common in most Charismatic circles today, as is shown by 1Co 14:21-23 ESV In the Law it is written, "By people of strange tongues and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people, and even then they will not listen to me, says the Lord." (22) Thus tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers. (23) If, therefore, the whole church comes together and all speak in tongues, and outsiders or unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are out of your minds?"I believe walking into many charismatic churches today Paul's prophesy about thinking that some people are out of their minds has come to pass...As far as Mark 16 is concerned, Mar 16:16-18 ESV Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. (17) And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; (18) they will pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover."do you --- or anyone else here who speaks in tongues-- also routinely drink poison...? Do you also routinely handle poisonous snakes? If you think that Jesus meant that all believers everywhere will speak in tongues (in the ecstatic utterance sense of the term) then why do you not also drink poison and handle poisonous snakes just as often as you speak in tongues?you ask
Now how would you know? Does your church do this often, or is this just an assumption based on what you have heard and not experienced for any length of time.
well I know from first hand experience because I attended charismatic churches for a long time... initially I listened to no one more than Kenneth Copeland... and Jerry Savelle was a close second...
I have been in service where someone has stood up and just stated to speak tongues. Interupting the whole thing. Unbiblical? yep, but your always going to have people that are not mature.
I have seen disruptive practices often in churches... but I am arguing against the modern form of tongue speaking on more of a basis than some who engage in the gifts (in the Pentecostal sense etc) do so in an immature or disruptive way... though that too is an argument against it...
You need to get your oppinion from those that actually operate in the Gifts of the Spirit and not the World of science so falsely called.
I do and I have....
It is this very reasoning that we are told Moses crossed he RED SEA, but it was just a puddle.
To say that I disagree with the modern form of tongue speaking is not to say that I am disagreeing with all things supernatural. This is an unfounded and false accusation against me. I am not saying that the supernatural does not happen, nor that the miraculous does not happen. Again, just because I disagree with the modern form of tongues speaking, it does not follow that I deny that Jesus was resurrected or that the walls of Jericho did not come down... please be careful in what you are actually arguing against... you do not want to erect straw men, mere caricatures of my position, and lump me in with people who are anti-supernaturalistic because this is not only tilting against windmills (it does not apply to me) but it is a subtle form of character assassination, a poisoning of the well... by insinuating that because I disagree with one thing (modern tongue speaking), that I therefore disagree with all these other things (God's supernatural and miraculous intervention) as well...Secondly, even if the Red Sea were little more than a large shallow lake, the account still would have been miraculous... just imagine, God drowned nearly the whole Egyptian army in a shallow lake!!
These gifts are spiritual!!! Not to undertood with conventional wisdom of man, and Paul clearly stated that our mind would not understand what we have said.
I do not disagree that spiritual gifts are, well... spiritual!! :)Again, be careful to actually disagree with what I saying, not about what I am not saying.Secondly on this point, where did Paul say that our mind would not understand what we are saying? Are you referring to 1 Cor. 14:2? Well lets grant for the moment that this is the case, then it would follow that modern tongue speaking is still out of line. "Since tongue speaking is vertically directed to God rather than horizontally addressed to men, it is totally inappropriate for ekklçsia (assembly) worship. Moreover, since it is addressed to God, it is unintelligible to humans. The tongue speaker is speaking mysteries (musthvria, mystçria) with his spirit, a phenomenon with little value for others within earshot." (CPC)But Paul also said that we must have our minds engaged when we worship the Lord. 1Co 14:15-16 ESV What am I to do? I will pray with my spirit, but I will pray with my mind also; I will sing praise with my spirit, but I will sing with my mind also. (16) Otherwise, if you give thanks with your spirit, how can anyone in the position of an outsider say "Amen" to your thanksgiving when he does not know what you are saying?"So, again, if people "pray in the spirit" or "sing in the spirit" in the Charismatic understanding of the terms, then if they do so in front of other people it is totally inappropriate. 1Co 14:19-20 ESV Nevertheless, in church I would rather speak five words with my mind in order to instruct others, than ten thousand words in a tongue. (20) Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature." A better understanding of what Paul meant in 1 Cor. 14:1ff... As commented on under
12:10, the practice of ecstatic utterances was common in many of the pagan Graeco-Roman religions of Paul's day, including those active in Corinth. Devotees of a god would drink and dance themselves into frenzies until they went into semiconsciousness or even unconsciousness—an experience they considered to be the highest form of communion with the divine. They believed that in such drunkenness their spirits left their bodies and communed directly with the god or gods, a practice to which Paul alludes in
Ephesians 5:18. The ecstatic speaking that often accompanied such experiences was thought to be the language of the gods. The terms
lalein glossei/
glossais (to speak in a tongue/in tongues) that Paul uses so frequently in
chapter 14 were commonly used in his day to describe pagan ecstatic speech. The Greeks also used
eros to describe the experience. Though commonly used of sexual love,
erōs also was used for any strongly sensual feeling or activity, and pagan ecstatic frenzies often were accompanied by sexual orgies and perversions of all sorts. In the church at Corinth much of the tongues-speaking had taken on the form and flavor of those pagan ecstasies. Emotionalism all but neutralized their rational senses, and selfish exhibitionism was common, with everyone wanting to do and say his own thing at the same time (
v. 26). Services were bedlam and chaos, with little worship and little edification taking place. Because of the extreme carnality in the church at Corinth, we can be sure that much of the tongues-speaking there was counterfeit. Believers were in no spiritual condition to properly use true spiritual gifts or properly manifest true spiritual fruit. How could a congregation so worldly, opinionated, selfish, cliquish, envious, jealous, divisive, argumentative, arrogant, disorderly, defrauding, inconsiderate, gluttonous, immoral, and desecrative of the Lord's Supper exercise the gifts of the Spirit? For them to have done so would have defied every biblical principle of spirituality. You cannot walk in the Spirit while exercising the flesh. Against the backdrop of such false experiences Paul teaches three basic truths about the gift of tongues: its position is secondary to prophecy (
vv. 1-19); its purpose was as a sign to unbelievers (
vv. 20-25); and its proper procedure, or use, was systematic and orderly (
vv. 26-40). Within the first section, the apostle gives three reasons why the position of tongues Is secondary to that of prophecy: prophecy edifies the whole congregation; tongues are unintelligible; and the effects of tongues are emotional rather than rational. The type of tongues the Corinthians practiced had no edifying value at all. It could
not speak to men; it could give them no instruction or exhortation. It could only speak
to God. I believe a better translation, however, is "to a god." The Greek has no definite article, and such anarthrous constructions usually are translated with an indefinite article (see
Acts 17:23, where the same form of
theō [god] is used in reference to "
an unknown god"). The translation here of "a god" is supported by the fact that the Bible records no instance of believers speaking to God in anything but normal, intelligible language. Even in Jesus' great high priestly prayer (
John 17), in which the Son poured out His heart to the Father, when deity communed with deity, the language is remarkably simple and clear. Jesus in fact warned against using "meaningless repetition, as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their many words" (
Matt. 6:7). His reference included the repetitious and unintelligible gibberish of pagan tongues-speaking, in which certain meaningless sounds were repeated over and over again. The instructional prayer Jesus then gave, commonly called the Lord's Prayer, is a model of simplicity and clarity. The carnal Corinthians, however, were much more interested in the sophisticated than the simple, in the mysterious rather than the edifying. They did not care that
no one understands, or literally, "no one hears." Their concern was for the excitement and self-gratification of speaking
mysteries in the
spirit. They did not care that the mysteries had no meaning to themselves or to anyone else. The
mysteries Paul has in mind here are of the type associated with the pagan mystery religions, out of which many of the Corinthian Christians had come. Unlike the mysteries of the gospel, which are revelations of things previously hidden (
Matt. 13:11;
Eph. 3:9; etc.), the pagan mysteries intentionally remained mysterious, as unknown truths and principles that supposedly only the initiated elite were privileged to know. The
spirit to which Paul refers is not the Holy Spirit, as some interpreters claim, but the person's own spirit, as implied in the Greek (locative case) and indicated in the nasb by
his (cf.
vv. 14-16). Paul is not advocating tongues, but simply characterizing the uselessness of efforts to counterfeit them. A believer who properly ministers a true spiritual gift ministers not to a false god, but to others.
One who prophesies, for example,
speaks to men for edification and exhortation and consolation. The purpose of prophecy is to build up by
edification, to encourage through exhortation, and to comfort through
consolation. Spiritual gifts are meant to accomplish something spiritually and practically worthwhile, and are always meant to be of benefit to others, believer or unbeliever. On the other hand,
one who speaks in a tongue edifies himself. I believe Paul's point here is sarcastic. (His sarcasm can also be seen in
4:8-10, and reaches its height in
14:16, "was it from you that the word of God first went forth?") Because even true tongues must be interpreted in order to be understood, they cannot possibly edify anyone, including the person speaking, without such interpretation. They cannot, therefore, be intended by God for private devotional use, as many Pentecostals and charismatics claim. Paul here is referring to the
supposed value the Corinthians placed on their self-styled tongues-speaking. The satisfaction many of the believers experienced in their abuse of tongues was
self-satisfaction, which came from pride-induced emotion, not from spiritual edification. It is an illegitimate self-building, often building up nothing more than spiritual pride. The believer, however, who
prophesies edifies the church. That person uses his gift to minister, as all the gifts are meant to do. The purpose of gifts, Paul was saying, is to minister
for God but not
to God. Their purpose certainly is not to selfishly minister to ourselves, as some of the Corinthian believers thought they were doing by speaking in tongues. Our gifts are to minister to others for God's glory. "To each one is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good" (
12:7). MacArthur New Testament Commentary, The - MacArthur New Testament Commentary – 1 Corinthians.
aul clearly stated that our mind would not understand what we have said. The sound may sound the same over and over with some that pray in tongues, it does not mean the sound, not being the excate same had a different meaning, though it appears to be the same word with natural hearing.
all understandings of language, say that while we may have some synonyms etc if the same word came to mean many many different and contradictory things, then it would basically come to mean nothing at all... when a person who thinks they are speaking in tongues repeats the same "phrase" over and over again I believe they are violating Jesus command to not engage in meaningless repetition.. ... Mat 6:7 NASB "And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their many words."
I agree Brother, it must line up with Scripture!!! However there is more to your life, that scripture did not cover. The sheep know his voice, and a child of God is led by the Spirit of God. God has something to say to you!!!
yes, everything must line up with Scripture...and i agree that there are some things the Scripture does not cover, like atomic bombs or the internet, but there are principles that goven the use of both those things... but, in the case of tongues, we do have scriptural commands as to what it ought to be, and how it ought to be engaged im...yes, i agree that Jesus' sheep will always hear His voice...and that a child of God is led by the Spirit...and that God has something to say to me... He has in fact already said it, its either directly in the Scriptures, or can be deduced from the Scriptures by good and necessary consequence...I am glad that your son got better, and again, don't confuse what I am disagreeing with with what I do agree with... I firmly believe that God is actively working in the lives of His people to this very day... and I do not doubt that God could have revealed to you the source of your son's infection... God could have easily revealed that to you with tongues or without it... that you felt that you had to pray in tongues is just something you personally had to do, but I do not see any scriptural command to do so... and just because God healed your son, it does not follow that we have to speak in tongues, and no offense, I know you are a sincere Christian and mean well.. we just disagree...blessings,ken