Poor Arnie, you've been reduced to hurling insults?
I certainly hope you don't do that to people you witness to. Tsk tsk tsk......
My browser didn't allow me to see your attachment this morning. Mea culpa.
But that doesn't change the fact it was not an actual study, regardless of your desperate defense.
Again, it was NOT a 'study' at all. The patients were asked questions and surveyed, not "studied."
For your information I DO know what an interview by a medical professional means.
It is nothing more than asking medical questions of you and recording your response.
There is absolutely nothing done to confirm that your response is accurate or honest.
An interview is only the FIRST STEP of a study, not the study itself.
If it were part of an actual study then they would first confirm that the same questions were asked of every person, and then they would POST the actual questions for all to see.
They would then give a breakdown of the answers they received and explain what they gathered from those answers and how they were THEN GOING TO GO FORWARD TO CONDUCT THE ACTUAL STUDY.
And yes I know this for a fact. I have participated in two complete studies for Diabetes and one for Chronic Fatigue.
You say "your doctor interviews you to understand your symptoms."
True, but he doesn't then diagnose and prescribe based on the answer to those questions, does he?
NO, of course not.
He takes your temperature, listens to your heart, checks your blood pressure, uses a tongue depresser and looks in your mouth, perhaps draws blood for further testing, etc etc etc...
I would assume you are smart enough to understand the difference lol
There is nothing about that page you posted that gives it any type of validation.....period.
What is glowingly obvious is that you are intentionally skipping over the fact the first link you provided claiming things about the World Health Organization was completely shredded and shown as utterly false by the links I provided from the ACTUAL World Health Organization. LOL
Or to put it another way......
You seemed to feel that the WHO was a legitimate source on the topic when you posted that link.
You are left being shown wrong because you can hardly turn around now and claim they are hacks or in someone's pocket.
You
Have
Literally
Painted
Yourself
Into
A
Corner
I for one find that terribly amusing.
If your dignity somehow allows you to respond again, why not comment on the WHO's findings on the dangers of smoking and the OBVIOUS dangers of second hand smoke, hmmmm?
I certainly hope you don't do that to people you witness to. Tsk tsk tsk......
My browser didn't allow me to see your attachment this morning. Mea culpa.
But that doesn't change the fact it was not an actual study, regardless of your desperate defense.
Again, it was NOT a 'study' at all. The patients were asked questions and surveyed, not "studied."
For your information I DO know what an interview by a medical professional means.
It is nothing more than asking medical questions of you and recording your response.
There is absolutely nothing done to confirm that your response is accurate or honest.
An interview is only the FIRST STEP of a study, not the study itself.
If it were part of an actual study then they would first confirm that the same questions were asked of every person, and then they would POST the actual questions for all to see.
They would then give a breakdown of the answers they received and explain what they gathered from those answers and how they were THEN GOING TO GO FORWARD TO CONDUCT THE ACTUAL STUDY.
And yes I know this for a fact. I have participated in two complete studies for Diabetes and one for Chronic Fatigue.
You say "your doctor interviews you to understand your symptoms."
True, but he doesn't then diagnose and prescribe based on the answer to those questions, does he?
NO, of course not.
He takes your temperature, listens to your heart, checks your blood pressure, uses a tongue depresser and looks in your mouth, perhaps draws blood for further testing, etc etc etc...
I would assume you are smart enough to understand the difference lol
There is nothing about that page you posted that gives it any type of validation.....period.
What is glowingly obvious is that you are intentionally skipping over the fact the first link you provided claiming things about the World Health Organization was completely shredded and shown as utterly false by the links I provided from the ACTUAL World Health Organization. LOL
Or to put it another way......
You seemed to feel that the WHO was a legitimate source on the topic when you posted that link.
You are left being shown wrong because you can hardly turn around now and claim they are hacks or in someone's pocket.
You
Have
Literally
Painted
Yourself
Into
A
Corner
I for one find that terribly amusing.
If your dignity somehow allows you to respond again, why not comment on the WHO's findings on the dangers of smoking and the OBVIOUS dangers of second hand smoke, hmmmm?
