Daniel's GAP Theory (for the New Testament)
Daniel 9:24 = Acts 13:20-23 (490 Years Approximately to SEAL up the Vision, or to the Crucifixon of Jesus, unified field human dirth charge completed//NULLIFIED) (NO GAP)
Daniel 9:25 = Galatians 3:17-18 (430 Years in Egypt, or, 62 Weeks, and then the, 7 weeks, Jubilee Moses counted with the Exodus) (Abraham's Sacrifice of Animals, was given more detail with Moses's Jubilee, and the Sacrifice of Animals) (NO GAP)
Daniel 9:26 = Ezekiel 4:5-6 (430 Years for the Medes and the Persians, to, Cut off the Messiah (by the hand of the lord) and remove the Jewish people from babylon, along with their babylonian slaves) (NO GAP)
Daniel 9:27 = John 2:20 (Jesus said a Jubilee will pass before I am Crucified) (NO GAP)
(Seventy Weeks of Daniel was not written for the New Testament.............all prophecy is valuable and the language is viewed that way, and this can be a snare for the wicked) (jesus wasn't that old when he died, but Jesus has to tell us because God adds factors into his measurement, that whole series of events shortly before jesus's birth god counted towards a jubilee period)
"Daniel's GAP Theory for the New Testament"
*NULLIFIED*NULLIFIED*NULLIFIED*NULLIFIED* (NULLIFIED*)
*NULLIFIED*NULLIFIED*NULLIFIED*NULLIFIED* (NULLIFIED*)
(legal series of invalid inputs as best I can say at the moment)
DANIEL 12:9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words [are] closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
DANIEL 12:11 And from the time [that] the daily [sacrifice] shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, [there shall be] a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
DANIEL 12:12 Blessed [is] he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.
(1290 and 1335 is Daniel's Gap Theory, its an INVALID INPUT, intended for the New Testament)
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Revelation's GAP Theory (for the New Testament)
************
(this is a sound answer not a good one, so I will try to explain)
(God had only four cycles in view with the old testament, when God said, regardless of mankind's dead flesh accusation, I will go ahead, and furnish the earth for the faithful and remove the controversy of man's accusation with god over its activities and generations) (only four times)
(Joseph appears how many times in the old testament, now, we will say about four times only, but several books made statements surrounding those events so it appears like more, but its really not)
In the New Testament, the sons of man are under joseph, so it has really been more then four times, during those specific cyclical actions, God looks to the son of man for the rebuke or acknowledgement of this argument....................history is largely invalid..............now mankind can at any time, answer god by removing dead flesh, but mankind is suicide pleasure only.
"1260 and 1260" is a GAP THEORY, like "1290 and 1335" is a GAP THEORY, however, what god does differently in the New Testament is...................God does not acknowledge the Son of Man and Mankind in certain cyclical actions..............God will always only acknowledge or bless the son of man, and not humanity this is the difference between daniel's gap theory and revelations gap theory
.............................
"1260 and 1260" will apply to the son of man, in god's cyclical behavior regardless of humanity, and this will most likly not apply to humanity/earth.
HOWEVER
"1290 and 1335" will continue to apply to humanity, its a nullified value
Everything is Resolved Now (people call this GAP THEORY A "DUMB JEW", because your not susposed to explain that daniel's prophecy of weeks is not for the new testament, humanities's filth has a name that has taken the expression of the jewish people, blind and dumb, is a stark division for the faithful, and a blessing, but a very sad and miserable way to die for humanity)
(just because we did not say this directly before, does not mean this is not implied, you can blurr the lines of prophecy pretty good, but this is a bottom line answer, a legal answer the gospel, acknowledges)
Last edited: