Larry Sinclair's ignored allegations are finally made public.The Right Perspective has a detailed interview (check the site) with Sinclair where he gives specifics on giving oral to Obama twice, and that Obama smokes crack as recently as 1999.This story is buzzing around the internet, but the MSM hasn't touched it...yet, anyway. Sinclair claims that since he uploaded his story to youtube he has been contacted by reporters, and he submitted all of his information and submitted what he says is proof the incident(s) occured.Listen to the interview before judging on the youtube vid...though he seems a little off, his story has been consistant. It's kinda hard not to believe him given his passion and determination to get his story heard. If he's a pathological liar, he's a pretty good one.He's challenged Obama to take a lie detector test, and is gearing up to take a lie detector himself.You can view the lawsuit on The Smoking Gun that Sinclair filed against Obama's camp for threats and intimidation efforts against Sinclair to keep a lid on the story.Listen to the interview, and see what you think.
Gay sex, crack, and Obama?
- Thread starter wasabi
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Good grief, we're going to just take the word of some random guy on YouTube now?I could go and make up the same story about, say, John McCain right now and post it on YouTube if I so desired, in about five minutes. But you wouldn't believe me, of course, just like you shouldn't believe this guy. With the run for the Democratic nomination so close, Barack Obama has more important things to do than take lie-detector tests to refute the allegations of every random kook on the internet that happens not to like him.It's no surprise that this hasn't hit the mainstream media in the month since he posted the video - because his allegations are completely unfounded and not worth anyone's time. A YouTube video does not a case make.
Obama does actually think there is such a thing as age appropriate sex ed classes for kindergarters.
(Lunar;35912)
Good grief, we're going to just take the word of some random guy on YouTube now?I could go and make up the same story about, say, John McCain right now and post it on YouTube if I so desired, in about five minutes. But you wouldn't believe me, of course, just like you shouldn't believe this guy. With the run for the Democratic nomination so close, Barack Obama has more important things to do than take lie-detector tests to refute the allegations of every random kook on the internet that happens not to like him.It's no surprise that this hasn't hit the mainstream media in the month since he posted the video - because his allegations are completely unfounded and not worth anyone's time. A YouTube video does not a case make.
Dont take my word for it...google Larry Sinclair and investigate the contents in the pages upon pages that come up for yourself. He's made his face known, he's working with reporters, he's filed a lawsuit...the story will be breaking...unless some wackjob silences/kills him first.You say you could make a video...what would be your motive? Only to make a point Sinclair could be lying. I doubt you'd be hit with a lawsuit by McCain if making a point about Sinclair was your intent.What's Sinclair's intent? He's facing a far greater personal risk with this "whopper" than you would be with yours, yes?
Good grief, we're going to just take the word of some random guy on YouTube now?I could go and make up the same story about, say, John McCain right now and post it on YouTube if I so desired, in about five minutes. But you wouldn't believe me, of course, just like you shouldn't believe this guy. With the run for the Democratic nomination so close, Barack Obama has more important things to do than take lie-detector tests to refute the allegations of every random kook on the internet that happens not to like him.It's no surprise that this hasn't hit the mainstream media in the month since he posted the video - because his allegations are completely unfounded and not worth anyone's time. A YouTube video does not a case make.
Dont take my word for it...google Larry Sinclair and investigate the contents in the pages upon pages that come up for yourself. He's made his face known, he's working with reporters, he's filed a lawsuit...the story will be breaking...unless some wackjob silences/kills him first.You say you could make a video...what would be your motive? Only to make a point Sinclair could be lying. I doubt you'd be hit with a lawsuit by McCain if making a point about Sinclair was your intent.What's Sinclair's intent? He's facing a far greater personal risk with this "whopper" than you would be with yours, yes?
larrysinclair0926 (4 hours ago) Show Hide Marked as spam Reply | Spam I have just accepted the polygraph challange by white house dot com as long as the examiner is expert like Trimarco and they have no connections to any candidate.
Visit whitehouse dot com to view the challenge. They've now updated that Sinclair is in contact with them.
Visit whitehouse dot com to view the challenge. They've now updated that Sinclair is in contact with them.
(wasabi;35992)
You say you could make a video...what would be your motive?
What would be the motive? I don't know, maybe the $10,000 Larry Sinclair was offered by whitehouse.com to take the polygraph, plus the possible $100,000 bonus if he manages to pass it. It's a completely disgusting affair - the guy is fabricating claims about Obama and now he stands to profit from it.
You say you could make a video...what would be your motive?
What would be the motive? I don't know, maybe the $10,000 Larry Sinclair was offered by whitehouse.com to take the polygraph, plus the possible $100,000 bonus if he manages to pass it. It's a completely disgusting affair - the guy is fabricating claims about Obama and now he stands to profit from it.
From Oct 07http: // pajamasmedia.com / xpress / ronrosenbaum / 2007 / 10 / 29/ shocking_inside_dc_scandal_rum . phpremove spaces
They didn't have to offer him money, they just did anyway. Seems a little too generous and unnecessary if you ask me.You can't really fault Sinclair for making the video then being offered money for a polygragh since Sinclair couldn't predict anyone would offer him money for one.
(wasabi;35992)
Dont take my word for it...google Larry Sinclair and investigate the contents in the pages upon pages that come up for yourself. He's made his face known, he's working with reporters, he's filed a lawsuit...the story will be breaking...unless some wackjob silences/kills him first.You say you could make a video...what would be your motive? Only to make a point Sinclair could be lying. I doubt you'd be hit with a lawsuit by McCain if making a point about Sinclair was your intent.
I am going to have to agree with Lunar on this in regard to the fact any fruit can make a video making all the claims they want and post it on the net.Considering the fact Obama is a liberal the drug use and gay sex thing would not have any impact on his campaign because liberals support such nonsense.Obama is not going after the conservative,real christian,and patriotic vote,he going for the left wing anti-American,l,anti-war/military, liberal anti-religious,globalist/internationalist and phony religious voter.I seen the you tube video,the man offers no proof to back up his allegationshttp://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY
What's Sinclair's intent?
Money.Either he is being paid to do it,he thinks he might be damaging Obama's reputation or extortion.
He's facing a far greater personal risk with this "whopper" than you would be with yours, yes?
I don't see how.Is he rich or head of a multi-billion dollar corporation?
Dont take my word for it...google Larry Sinclair and investigate the contents in the pages upon pages that come up for yourself. He's made his face known, he's working with reporters, he's filed a lawsuit...the story will be breaking...unless some wackjob silences/kills him first.You say you could make a video...what would be your motive? Only to make a point Sinclair could be lying. I doubt you'd be hit with a lawsuit by McCain if making a point about Sinclair was your intent.
I am going to have to agree with Lunar on this in regard to the fact any fruit can make a video making all the claims they want and post it on the net.Considering the fact Obama is a liberal the drug use and gay sex thing would not have any impact on his campaign because liberals support such nonsense.Obama is not going after the conservative,real christian,and patriotic vote,he going for the left wing anti-American,l,anti-war/military, liberal anti-religious,globalist/internationalist and phony religious voter.I seen the you tube video,the man offers no proof to back up his allegationshttp://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY
What's Sinclair's intent?
Money.Either he is being paid to do it,he thinks he might be damaging Obama's reputation or extortion.
He's facing a far greater personal risk with this "whopper" than you would be with yours, yes?
I don't see how.Is he rich or head of a multi-billion dollar corporation?
Sinclair will be giving a press conference soon he says. We'll see.And Oreilly made a subtle reference to it today on his show.On youtube look up: a clue the larry sinclair story is about to go mainstream
You guys crack me up. I mean you really do have it in for Obama.If obama wins this whole christianity board is going to move to canada.
(Letsgofishing;37277)
You guys crack me up. I mean you really do have it in for Obama.If obama wins this whole christianity board is going to move to canada.
Canada is a socialist nation. We're moving to Mexico! Grab your sun lotion!
You guys crack me up. I mean you really do have it in for Obama.If obama wins this whole christianity board is going to move to canada.
Canada is a socialist nation. We're moving to Mexico! Grab your sun lotion!
(Letsgofishing;37277)
You guys crack me up. I mean you really do have it in for Obama.If obama wins this whole christianity board is going to move to canada.
Canada is less tolerant of real Christian beliefs than the US is.
You guys crack me up. I mean you really do have it in for Obama.If obama wins this whole christianity board is going to move to canada.
Canada is less tolerant of real Christian beliefs than the US is.
Obama isnt he the black fella that thinks its ok to murder little babies in the protection of their mothers wombs?and is not that old white gal also running for president also on that same murder page?
Similar threads
