Is Hillary Clinton In Violation Of The Espionage Act Regarding Her Private Servers And Devices In Handling "Top Secret" Information?

[Truth7t7]

Hillary Clinton was in lawful possession of "Top Secrets" information, she through gross negligence permitted this to be removed from its proper place of custody, and put on her private insecure servers, computers, and mobile phones "Fact"

Hillary Clinton had full knowledge that this "Top Secret" information was removed from its proper place of custody, and placed on the private insecure devices mentioned above

Hillary Clinton was/is in violation of The Federal Espionafe Act, Section18 U.S. Code 793 (f) punishable by fine or maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, or both

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information​

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

​

FBI.GOV NEWS​

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System​

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

 

[Truth7t7]

Hillary Clinton was in lawful possession of "Top Secrets" information, she through gross negligence permitted this to be removed from its proper place of custody, and put on her private insecure servers, computers, and mobile phones "Fact"

Hillary Clinton had full knowledge that this "Top Secret" information was removed from its proper place of custody, and placed on the private insecure devices mentioned above

Hillary Clinton was/is in violation of The Federal Espionafe Act, Section18 U.S. Code 793 (f) punishable by fine or maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, or both

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information​

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

​

FBI.GOV NEWS​

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System​

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

Yes it very apparent there are two sets of systems concerning justice, and we the common people don't meet their grade

If we were guilty of the same, it would be maximum fine and 10 years in prison, while Hillary sits on the beach in Tahiti sipping Mai-Tais, looking back and laughing (Injustice) or (Just4Us)?

 

[lforrest]

Yes it very apparent there are two sets of systems concerning justice, and we the common people don't meet their grade

If we were guilty of the same, it would be maximum fine and 10 years in prison, while Hillary sits on the beach in Tahiti sipping Mai-Tais, looking back and laughing (Injustice) or (Just4Us)?

It isn't like we have a clause in our constitution that guarantees equal protection of the law. If we did then prosecutors wouldn't have prosecutorial discretion.

But the sons and daughters of the devil protect their own.

 

[TinMan]

Hillary Clinton was in lawful possession of "Top Secrets" information, she through gross negligence permitted this to be removed from its proper place of custody, and put on her private insecure servers, computers, and mobile phones "Fact"

Hillary Clinton had full knowledge that this "Top Secret" information was removed from its proper place of custody, and placed on the private insecure devices mentioned above

Hillary Clinton was/is in violation of The Federal Espionafe Act, Section18 U.S. Code 793 (f) punishable by fine or maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, or both

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information​

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

​

FBI.GOV NEWS​

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System​

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

and Comey went on to say: " Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

 

[TinMan]

It isn't like we have a clause in our constitution that guarantees equal protection of the law.

You might want to tell the Supreme Court. They don't seem to know or care about this.

 

[bluedragon]

Not according to Judge Comey .....

 

[ButterflyJones]

Hillary Clinton was in lawful possession of "Top Secrets" information, she through gross negligence permitted this to be removed from its proper place of custody, and put on her private insecure servers, computers, and mobile phones "Fact"

Hillary Clinton had full knowledge that this "Top Secret" information was removed from its proper place of custody, and placed on the private insecure devices mentioned above

Hillary Clinton was/is in violation of The Federal Espionafe Act, Section18 U.S. Code 793 (f) punishable by fine or maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, or both

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information​

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

​

FBI.GOV NEWS​

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System​

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

Nooooo, she's perfectly OK to violate any laws she chooses. As a trained attorney no less.
It's a Clinton privilege thing. Just ask the dead bodies stacked in that Left corner what happens to those who mean to make her and hubby stand accountable.

One guy wrote an expose' about all that and it was published before one of her failed presidential campaigns.
He was writing another book to release before her run against Trump. He told a friend just prior that if he ended up as a DUI ise to know that he would never do such a thing.
Sure enough he was found later at the top of a hill with a "self inflicted" gunshot wound to his head.

No,let's just focus on holding Trump accountable on trumped up charges just to lessen his chances in the 24 presidential election.


Trumped up charges.... C what I did there?

 

[Reggie Belafonte]

Nooooo, she's perfectly OK to violate any laws she chooses. As a trained attorney no less.
It's a Clinton privilege thing. Just ask the dead bodies stacked in that Left corner what happens to those who mean to make her and hubby stand accountable.

One guy wrote an expose' about all that and it was published before one of her failed presidential campaigns.
He was writing another book to release before her run against Trump. He told a friend just prior that if he ended up as a DUI ise to know that he would never do such a thing.
Sure enough he was found later at the top of a hill with a "self inflicted" gunshot wound to his head.

No,let's just focus on holding Trump accountable on trumped up charges just to lessen his chances in the 24 presidential election.


Trumped up charges.... C what I did there?

Did such get any media attention to the self inflicted shot ? one would think that would of been headline News for months ?

 

[Reggie Belafonte]

I remember seeing 2 other people who took Obama to court and won and they were shot dead coming out of Court house each time ?
But nothing in the MSM once again hidden nothing to be seen here !

I believe that the Democrats are so evil that they are just like Nazi Germany was and all Communist Nations. Remember how such as they got into Power, for they had fooled the people in fact ! then they had the power over all Government departments that being everyone Judges etc that fear for their lives in bring such to justice ! They stole the Election in fact and their is no process !
If the sitting President says it's been stolen ! a process should run forward directly and totally openly and that President should have the power to deal with anything that has been put in place so as to cover up Justice, so he can expose such directly calling it out, so as to demanding no obstruction like was done to Trump.
Not to mention the Banning of The President of the USA on Face Book etc ! That's just outright Nazi Communist tactics, Satanic ! and outright Lies peddled against the USA President. that the MSM were peddling a picture that they had created ! out right Nazi and Communistic, but what do you expect from Socialist. The Truth is not within them !

I believe that people of Power were in fear for their lives, so the Socialist are typical of such tactics ! that's why Justice was not served and we got a criminal mad man Joe Biden in Power, So corrupt and so pathetic stupid that he does not care less, look what he did to the defense Force in Afghanistan and it's all Nothing to be seen here ! What if Trump did the same botch up insanity ? you would not here the end of it in fact !
Then Biden worked so as to kick off the War in Ukraine, how wonderful! what an idiot ! he is the one who pushed for it all and only wants to escalate never anything but escalate with no regard to all them peoples lives, not to mention if a election was allowed Russia would of won in the disputed areas ! that's another thing that Biden just dismisses is the right for people to Vote ! He stole the presidency of the USA and then had no regard for the people in Ukraine to Vote and who is NATO ? it's an un elected body that dominates over others ? what is their ends ! they clearly have no regard for a voting public at all !

 

[Patrick1966]

A bunch of classified docs were found on Anthony Weiner's laptop. No charges.

 

[ButterflyJones]

Did such get any media attention to the self inflicted shot ? one would think that would of been headline News for months ?

It did at the time years ago. The colleague of the "suicide" even told his story of how the man, author, had said if he's found dead of a gunshot suicide, he didn't do it.

Knowing the risk Victor Thorn was taking publishing yet another expose of HRC, and again just before yet another presidential bid he wanted to cover his bases knowing the risks.