* It got my attention!!*

[Helen]

I am posting this video...and hope that some of you have 1:11mins to watch/listen to it.... I thought it was VERY good. He is easy to listen to if you get past his north country British accent.
As some of you know me a little better now...when you listen you will know it he says things that I have posted on the site that I don't agree with.
But, he jerked me a bit on some of the things.
So now I have to go back to the Lord and ask..."So, what about this then..if I am wrong , show me.." Which is always a good place to be.
I may have to re-assess my position on a couple of things...you will know what they are as you listen.
I had to do it in two chunks. I thought the first half very good...but the last half got my attention.
So..I leave it with you..
Let me know what you think. :) If I can find how to do this.

 

[101G]

past the link. got it.

 

[Helen]

past the link. got it.

Now I hope that you have time to listen, even in short spurts, and tell us what you think. :)

 

[mjrhealth]

I am posting this video...and hope that some of you have 1:11mins to watch/listen to it.... I thought it was VERY good. He is easy to listen to if you get past his north country British accent.
As some of you know me a little better now...when you listen you will know it he says things that I have posted on the site that I don't agree with.
But, he jerked me a bit on some of the things.
So now I have to go back to the Lord and ask..."So, what about this then..if I am wrong , show me.." Which is always a good place to be.
I may have to re-assess my position on a couple of things...you will know what they are as you listen.
I had to do it in two chunks. I thought the first half very good...but the last half got my attention.
So..I leave it with you..
Let me know what you think. :) If I can find how to do this.

Than there was the two branches from Isaac, Jacob and Esau. one born a freeman teh other in Bondage

 

[101G]

@BG, I made it halfway through the tube and wanted to stop, but I force myself to the end after two breaks. I have heard of this name game before. he's pushing a rapture scenario with the names and the man Enoch. this is a BIG ERROR. Enoch died, not rapture out of here. he used Hebrews 11:5 to prove his point. which was a disaster, because if he would have kept on reading unto verse 13 he would have had his answer. Hebrews 11:13 "These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth". Enoch died, so if Enoch was the rapture, then it's a dead one.

second, his assessment on "acceptance", can't buy it. scripture, Acts 10:34 & 35 "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him".

third, on the Cain line, he had some good points, but had many holes in it.

fourth, I'm glad he's not an apostle, or call himself an apostle, especially sent from God. and he did one good thing, not setting any dates, that was good of him.

overall, this teaching on a scale of 1 to 10, a 2. sorry about that.

but be blessed.

 

[Helen]

The

@BG, I made it halfway through the tube and wanted to stop, but I force myself to the end after two breaks. I have heard of this name game before. he's pushing a rapture scenario with the names and the man Enoch. this is a BIG ERROR. Enoch died, not rapture out of here. he used Hebrews 11:5 to prove his point. which was a disaster, because if he would have kept on reading unto verse 13 he would have had his answer. Hebrews 11:13 "These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth". Enoch died, so if Enoch was the rapture, then it's a dead one.

second, his assessment on "acceptance", can't buy it. scripture, Acts 10:34 & 35 "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him".

third, on the Cain line, he had some good points, but had many holes in it.

fourth, I'm glad he's not an apostle, or call himself an apostle, especially sent from God. and he did one good thing, not setting any dates, that was good of him.

overall, this teaching on a scale of 1 to 10, a 2. sorry about that.

but be blessed.

Thank you for you post...those are the things that I wanted feed back on.
That was kind of you to listen all the way through .
Like you, I had heard about the prophetical name many decades ago. But can't ever remember hearing much about Cains line.
I did like his take on Cain , false prophet etc...not heard that one before.

As you guessed, it was the rapture bit that jerked me...I don't think I had heard that used before like that..so you don't think that I need to second guess my stand? (which as you know , is anti )

His comments on "meeting so many 'apostles' these days" made me laugh...they do seem to be ten a penny now a days.

Again, thank you for taking the time.....I appreciate that. :)

 

[mjrhealth]

His comments on "meeting so many 'apostles' these days" made me laugh...they do seem to be ten a penny now a days.

As soon as anyone attaches any religious "standing" to there name I run from them, cause those in Christ should know better. There is none above another and cannot carry fancy titles, and if they demand them, than they belong to men and his religions not God.

 

[Helen]

As soon as anyone attaches any religious "standing" to there name I run from them, cause those in Christ should know better. There is none above another and cannot carry fancy titles, and if they demand them, than they belong to men and his religions not God.

Agree...I enjoyed the refreshing about the meanings of names ...especially of the line of Cain...I had not seen before anti-christ as clearly as that!
Bless you....H