BlueNightingale
Well-Known Member
Fixed itBlue nightingale doesn't agree with theapostle John andhis disciple Ignatius of Antioch
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Fixed itBlue nightingale doesn't agree with theapostle John andhis disciple Ignatius of Antioch
I did listen to Jesus and THREE TIMES I hear him saying "eat my flesh and drink my blood" for my flesh is REAL food and my blood is REAL drink.The point is, listen to Jesus over your church leaders. When they don't say the same as Jesus, listen to Jesus.
You call it lazy, I call it believing the Bible.
Much love!
The words I quoted are from John the Apostle. You don't "agree". That doesn't impress me and changing y words makes you look sad.Fixed it
I do agree with John. I do not agree with your interpretation. There's a difference.The words I quoted are from John the Apostle. You don't "agree". That doesn't impress me and changing y words makes you look sad.
Are you speaking into a mirror?What I love most about you people is your so prideful you can't see your own limitations. You think you speak authoritatively about Scripture with no evidence to support it.
So Jesus can't turn bread into his body but he can rise from the dead. Jesus should have sought your approval.
I believe John is accurately stating that Jesus Christ as speaking literally and the entire story proves he was. Now you say otherwise. I say the words are very clear but you have to cite volumes of other passages to try and explain away what Jesus is clearly saying.I do agree with John. I do not agree with your interpretation. There's a difference.
You don't believe that humans can be wrong?
When John the Baptist was asked if he was Elijah he said no.
When Jesus was asked if John the Baptist was Elijah, in the spirit and power of, he said he was.
So which do we believe? Jesus.
Are you speaking into a mirror?
Jesus said so, and you either believe Him or you don't, it's just that simple.Now you're telling me he didn't mean it literally.
What is this b st word supposed to be?It's the one characteristic that b st identifies a protestant.
1. Idiocy. I don't demand anything.This what you have chosen to believe -
1. At every Eucharist you demand Jesus to show up in the bread, demanding a supernatural miracle.
2. At every Eucharist you demand Jesus to turn the wine into his blood, demanding a supernatural miracle.
None of that happened during the last supper with the twelve as found in the Scriptures. Jesus did not offer the twelve his arm in order the twelve to take a bite, the bread remained bread, Jesus did not replaced the wine in the cup with his blood, the wine remained wine. All of this In total opposition with your literal interpretation of John 6. If Jesus meant John 6 literally then the Last Supper would have been in sync with John 6, and it was not. In the meantime John 6:63 has been posted a dozen times, but you prefer your faulty church teaching over Jesus words.
I do believe Jesus when he says THREE TIMES, eat my flesh and drink his blood then says, for my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Its only your opinion that he meant something else. I'm not impressed with your opinionJesus said so, and you either believe Him or you don't, it's just that simple.
Much love!
A better way to say it is pridefulness best characterizes protestants. You speak with a 500 year old heresy but you do it loudly. Good for youWhat is this b st word supposed to be?
Edit: Nevermind, I think it's supposed to be best.
OK.
You can't talk about other Christians being prideful and arrogant and then go off statements harmlessly presented to you as idiocy. There was no attack from myself or others.1. Idiocy. I don't demand anything.
2. Idiocy 2.0 I don't demand anything
Everything you wrote after that has to be idiocy 3.0.
I do believe Jesus when he says THREE TIMES, eat my flesh and drink his blood then says, for my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Its only your opinion that he meant something else. I'm not impressed with your opinion
The statement may be harmless but it's complete idiocy to claim that at mass I demand Jesus show up to do miracles. I'm not included to graciously entertain idiocy. Have I called anything you have posted to me, "idicoy"? No because it hasn't been and we've disagreed. What that person posted was idiocy. If you don't like that I said that I'd say I'm sorry but i don't like to lie. It was and still is idiocy and I will call it what it is.You can't talk about other Christians being prideful and arrogant and then go off statements harmlessly presented to you as idiocy. There was no attack from myself or others.
You have been attacking everyone else who disagrees with you, but most people have been peacemakers throughout.
If anything myself and others took the slaps you passed out and turned the other cheek. We refrained from retaliation and continued on with the discussion.
Whoever did not, I do not know, but since I responded to your post, it was just you getting upset for things you yourself are doing.
So I am stepping out.
You keep saying that, and I keep quoting Jesus' words.Its only your opinion that he meant something else
So do I. Prove your understanding of his words is authoritative.You keep saying that, and I keep quoting Jesus' words.
"My words are spirit, the flesh profits nothing."
So go ahead, if you believe you are eating Jesus' flesh as you eat your church's communion wafer, just realize, it profits you nothing. Not my opinion, Jesus' words.
Anyway, you've been shown this, I'm done.
Much love!
Why would a symbolic meaning be viewed as a "hard saying" or why would anyone be offended by a symbol? I have no trouble believing that Jesus is speaking literally. Its a hard saying but it doesn't offend me. I don't know how he does it and I dont need to know but I just believe Jesus does give us his flesh to eat and his blood to drink in the Eucharist. He loves us and wouldnt scandalize us by allowing us to see whats actually present. I see with faith not with my eyes. You're the one that has the problem with his message not me.John 6:56-64 KJV
56) He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
57) As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
58) This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
59) These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.
60) Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?
61) When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?
62) What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?
63) It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
64) But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
The statement may be harmless but it's complete idiocy to claim that at mass I demand Jesus show up to do miracles. I'm not included to graciously entertain idiocy. Have I called anything you have posted to me, "idicoy"? No because it hasn't been and we've disagreed. What that person posted was idiocy. If you don't like that I said that I'd say I'm sorry but i don't like to lie. It was and still is idiocy and I will call it what it is.
That poster claims i "demand" God show up and perform a miracle. I do not. It's idiocy to claim I do. You can't properly understand what I wrote but I'm supposed to believe you properly understand what John wrote 2000 years ago? LMBOIt's what you believe, that Jesus shows up and is literally present in the bread and the wine, allowing you to eat his body and drink his blood. Your church itself calls it a miracle. All because you understand John 6 the wrong way. No idiocy here.