Ladies and Gentlemen

[Cristo Rei]

Hi, hope everyone is doing well. Id like you guys to listen to what the opposition leader of Australia (left) said...
Its only 3 minutes. Im going to reserve my opinion for now cos im more interested to know what peoples thoughts and reactions are first, in particular what the ladies say as he is talking about them...

 

[APAK]

Hi, hope everyone is doing well. Id like you guys to listen to what the opposition leader of Australia (left) said...
Its only 3 minutes. Im going to reserve my opinion for now cos im more interested to know what peoples thoughts and reactions are first, in particular what the ladies say as he is talking about them...

Even not knowing what is meant by 'cap' level and I believe he said 'taper rate' means, it seems like this issue is complex mixed bag. On the one hand wife/spouses works for pennies or nothing at times paying sitters...my wife was one of them...and then on the other side, more tax payers will have to fork out more money to pay for this increase support for early child development...I assuming that this child support program pays for all day education....
Yes, he has a point that if the mother has to work whether single or married they can improve the economy and even lift themselves out of debt?

It is a question of balance....not to add more burden/overburdens the regular taxpayer in the country, and then to allow somehow to let spouse have the opportunity to earn more real income and improve the overall economy of the nation....

 

[Cristo Rei]

Even not knowing what is meant by 'cap' level and I believe he said 'taper rate' means, it seems like this issue is complex mixed bag. On the one hand wife/spouses works for pennies or nothing at times paying sitters...my wife was one of them...and then on the other side, more tax payers will have to fork out more money to pay for this increase support for early child development...I assuming that this child support program pays for all day education....
Yes, he has a point that if the mother has to work whether single or married they can improve the economy and even lift themselves out of debt?

It is a question of balance....not to add more burden/overburdens the regular taxpayer in the country, and then to allow somehow to let spouse have the opportunity to earn more real income and improve the overall economy of the nation....

You have experience in a marriage and raising children. I don't. So I appreciate your opinion and value it...
Id love to here from more people that are/were parents as well, especially the girls, before i elaborate on what doesn't sit well with me...

I hope more people respond as i really tjhink this is a topic that is really important... The family unit
The family unite is the number one key to sustaining a society... And i don't think i need to provide evidence of the corrosion of the family unit we have today... It will a semi rant-like observation of where it went wrong after i hear from a few more people... Cmon ladies... What do u think?

Who knows, maybe someone from the next civilizations will read this and benifit from the mistakes of this one...

 

[Cristo Rei]

Ok i watched the video again and its not as apparent to me as it was when i first heard it... However the message is there

The message i got was to take the mothers away from their children and into the work force as child care can look after the kids...

And i see a deceiving camouglage cloak by saying the Australian economy is being held back by the lack of female participation...
It is worded in a way that says there are jobs that only women can do and a lack of them is damaging the economy...

My interpretation is that their blaming the fact that women have babies and want to raise families for the economy...
Their puuling them away from our kids now... WAKE UP PEOPLE WAKE UP

@APAK your a very well educated and experience guy... What would you say if i told you women didn't feminism...
What if i said that feminism was invented by men... Not all of us men, no. Im talking about the handful of faceless men that are playing this marionette puppet show... The elite... The most evil of men...
What are u thinking so far.... Am i conspiracy theorist? Or are u tuned in?

If im going to be frank i will need to define feminism and perhaps issue a trigger warning and confirmation of my intentions to try and cover myself...
Whenever the f word is used, feminism, there might set a chain of explosions so i will legal protect myself with definitions and disclaimers first, such are the world we live in... But all that tmrw... bed time now...

Need a good night sleep before attempting to talk about the f word

 

[APAK]

Ok i watched the video again and its not as apparent to me as it was when i first heard it... However the message is there

The message i got was to take the mothers away from their children and into the work force as child care can look after the kids...

And i see a deceiving camouglage cloak by saying the Australian economy is being held back by the lack of female participation...
It is worded in a way that says there are jobs that only women can do and a lack of them is damaging the economy...

My interpretation is that their blaming the fact that women have babies and want to raise families for the economy...
Their puuling them away from our kids now... WAKE UP PEOPLE WAKE UP

@APAK your a very well educated and experience guy... What would you say if i told you women didn't feminism...
What if i said that feminism was invented by men... Not all of us men, no. Im talking about the handful of faceless men that are playing this marionette puppet show... The elite... The most evil of men...
What are u thinking so far.... Am i conspiracy theorist? Or are u tuned in?

If im going to be frank i will need to define feminism and perhaps issue a trigger warning and confirmation of my intentions to try and cover myself...
Whenever the f word is used, feminism, there might set a chain of explosions so i will legal protect myself with definitions and disclaimers first, such are the world we live in

Feminism was invented in the 60s to infiltrate the Western 1st world countries at the beginning...It is but ONLY ONE way/plank to bring in socialism and later the more severe form -communism.

These are the NWO/Zionist Cabal Satanist cults we see today, as they attempt push in one of their servants (useful idiots) Biden, into the White House today.

It was all planned, indeed

 

[Cristo Rei]

Feminism was invented in the 60s to infiltrate the Western 1st world countries at the beginning...It is but ONLY ONE way/plank to bring in socialism and later the more severe form -communism.

These are the NWO/Zionist Cabal Satanist cults we see today, as they attempt push in one of their servants (useful idiots) Biden, into the White House today.

It was all planned, indeed

Ahahaha i just finished replying to your post on another thread... Came here and im ROFL now after reading the first word.

Yeee id say the term feminism probably came into the 60s... They say feminism started with the suffogets for the vote... That has its own side story...
I was going to talk about after WW2... The saw that the women were excellent workers. They kept industry going to supply the war...
The elite thought, if they could get women into the work force it would slash wages by half... But how can they do that...
They did that by lying to women like he did at the very start...
Now im not tying to blame woman or link them to evil or disrespect them any way shape or form

The snake used Eve to deceive man. But first he had to deceive Eve, he does this by telling her she will be like Gods if she eats...
Its the temptation to be above her husband to be like Gods that tempts her... Many women won't submit to there husbands, they want to be "equal" at least if not above if they can. Its Satans lie that she must be equal or greater than man cos there is the natural authority of heirarchy as explained in the bible...

And both men and women need to understand what submitting means. Doesn't mean slavery but it does mean one person has to make the final say in matters... Everything collaplses if the foundation collapses...

So they convinced women that fulfillment in life was in the workplace like the men. When really in its family... In the 50s and 60s a mans wage was enough for the dream; a house a wife and kids, a car or 2, a holiday house and or annual holidays... A woman had the option to work if she wanted or not... Men did not hold women back like the snakes teach them... U see women in medicine from ancient times let along form the 17th century. They are also represented in law and everywhere else... There isn't as many as men because women choose to raise their family and keep the household economics in order...

Fast forward... Women are raised to work and can't raise their kids even if they want to... My mum was stolen from us...

But im to sweepy sweepy now... Hittin the sack goodnight

 

[Enoch111]

Australian economy is being held back by the lack of female participation..

That's like saying the Australian economy is being held back because the kangaroos were not given a quota in the work force. More nonsense from Down Under. When will the insanity end?

 

[Cristo Rei]

That's like saying the Australian economy is being held back because the kangaroos were not given a quota in the work force. More nonsense from Down Under. When will the insanity end?

Its a ploy to pull more women away from their families...

The proper way is for a mother to raise her child, not a stranger... But they want women to work as it provides more labour which keeps wages low... It also opens business for child care which makes more money for them to tax...

Itss sooo dirty...

Ask mothers if they would prefer to be with their kids when their growing up or work and 90% would rather raise their kids...
When i asked my mum that question she started crying because she worked afternoon shift while dad looked after us and so would of missed a lot of time with us...

They pulled our mum away from us when it was most needed by forcing her to work....
Ohh THE ANGER. HOW CAN THEY GET AWAY WITH THIS... AARRRRGGGGHHHH... CRIMINALS...
This heartless system is robbing children and mothers and leaving them traumatized.
The thought of it made my mum break down, thats PTSD... Add to that the guilt that she carried because she was unable to be a mother...

SCREW THIS SOCIETY I HATE IT... THEY TOOK AWAY MY MUM AND MADE HER WORK... THEY KEPT HER AWAY FROM US... THEY HURT MY MUM AND I DON'T LIKE IT... I DON'T BLOODY LIKE IT AT ALL...

STOOPID BLOODY FEMINISTS OHH EQUALITY AND THIS AND THAT, WAKE UP YA AIR HEADS COS UV BEEN PLAYED. UR FORCED TO WORK NOW...
LIED TO BY SATAN. DECEIVED INTO OPPOSING AND COMPETING AGAINST MEN... PROMISED FULLFLLMENT IN WORK...

 

[Rita]

I can only speak from my own experiences. When I was first married I was fortunate that I could be stay at home mum. Despite me and my husbands differences after I became a Christian, we agreed on the whole subject of child care and roles. I didn’t start work until my children went to school or play school (three years old ) . They didn’t really have much child care for the under threes back then. I didn’t go into full time employment until my children were old enough to be at home by themselves. I was fortunate.
Things have changed now, house prices and private rental homes are just so high in the UK. It often needs two full time incomes to covers mortgage/ rent and bills. Many mums of young babies feel pressure to return to full time employment after 8-9 months, many don’t want to. The child care is equally high, so in some cases it doesn’t pay on one level to return to work.
My daughter in law works full time, but can only afford three days childcare so my son juggles his days off to cover the days she has to work. Obviously the fact that they both work supports the economy.
I believe when my grandson is thee they will qualify for more financial support with child care, it’s a lower percentage for the under threes.

I always saw my role as a mum relevant to the development of my children, my mum was a stay at home mum as well. I actually feel sorry for new mums having to make the decision because of the financial demands. Why not give child care payments to the mums themselves !!
Rita

 

[marks]

Hi, hope everyone is doing well. Id like you guys to listen to what the opposition leader of Australia (left) said...
Its only 3 minutes. Im going to reserve my opinion for now cos im more interested to know what peoples thoughts and reactions are first, in particular what the ladies say as he is talking about them...

Economically speaking, the household makes more money with both parents working. But that doesn't mean it's the right choice. It may be better to let parents instead of the state raise the children, and perhaps they will be more productive in society later, for having a healthier upbringing.

Much love!

 

[Cristo Rei]

I can only speak from my own experiences. When I was first married I was fortunate that I could be stay at home mum. Despite me and my husbands differences after I became a Christian, we agreed on the whole subject of child care and roles. I didn’t start work until my children went to school or play school (three years old ) . They didn’t really have much child care for the under threes back then. I didn’t go into full time employment until my children were old enough to be at home by themselves. I was fortunate.
Things have changed now, house prices and private rental homes are just so high in the UK. It often needs two full time incomes to covers mortgage/ rent and bills. Many mums of young babies feel pressure to return to full time employment after 8-9 months, many don’t want to. The child care is equally high, so in some cases it doesn’t pay on one level to return to work.
My daughter in law works full time, but can only afford three days childcare so my son juggles his days off to cover the days she has to work. Obviously the fact that they both work supports the economy.
I believe when my grandson is thee they will qualify for more financial support with child care, it’s a lower percentage for the under threes.

I always saw my role as a mum relevant to the development of my children, my mum was a stay at home mum as well. I actually feel sorry for new mums having to make the decision because of the financial demands. Why not give child care payments to the mums themselves !!
Rita

Pulling mothers away from their kids is absolutely criminal in my opinion. Being forced to work when you would rather be raising your kids is a form of torment known as "induced compliance" which basically creates much mental anguish...

Economically speaking, the household makes more money with both parents working. But that doesn't mean it's the right choice. It may be better to let parents instead of the state raise the children, and perhaps they will be more productive in society later, for having a healthier upbringing.

Much love!

I think that parents should be raising their kids, especially mums... Problem is that mums are forced to work now..