If it is ok to drop fire bombs on civilain areas of Tokyo and then spray diesel fuel on the fleeing civilians, we have no moral high ground. Either targeting civilians is an acceptable act of war or it is not. Since we affirm that is is, we are no better. And now that we are trying to re start the Cruades, our arrogance will not stand. To attack "Potential enemies" on the word of "Experts" is goint too far, we are now the evil empire. Show me where Christ calls upon us to kill potential enemies. There is no Gospel of Bombs and bullets.
Well my friend, if that's the case then what about the Israelites of the Bible? They continually went away from the Lord, committed all sorts of egregious sins, and yet he was still with them. Why? Because ultimately they believed in God as the one true God. You continually try and equate some measure of "preemptive" attack as a "Gospel of bombs and bullets" yet that is not the case.Now I don't know about you, but I don't need an "expert" to tell me that a group that has attacked Christians/Americans/Israelis/etc; even more so when they have it written in to their founding documents. To sit here and say because we attacked civilians in World War II we have no right to defend other Christian peoples from obvious attacks is an absurd argument. If that really is what you continue to advocate then you have handed both Satan and the terrorists the exact kind of victory that they are looking for. You've managed to blur the lines between good and evil; those who accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior and those who do not. I have a problem with that, as you can tell. I think it's more than safe to say the Bible does too.
Well my friend, if that's the case then what about the Israelites of the Bible? They continually went away from the Lord, committed all sorts of egregious sins, and yet he was still with them. Why? Because ultimately they believed in God as the one true God. You continually try and equate some measure of "preemptive" attack as a "Gospel of bombs and bullets" yet that is not the case.Now I don't know about you, but I don't need an "expert" to tell me that a group that has attacked Christians/Americans/Israelis/etc; even more so when they have it written in to their founding documents. To sit here and say because we attacked civilians in World War II we have no right to defend other Christian peoples from obvious attacks is an absurd argument. If that really is what you continue to advocate then you have handed both Satan and the terrorists the exact kind of victory that they are looking for. You've managed to blur the lines between good and evil; those who accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior and those who do not. I have a problem with that, as you can tell. I think it's more than safe to say the Bible does too.