is it?
Are you absolutely sure, m feener, bc to me you sound convinced that you are absolutely stating a fact there?
Are you willing to bet your life that "that's all bull," sir?
Do you even realize that you are employing Satan's Dialectic there in your reply?
How could you, when you do not know what Satan's Dialectic even sounds like?
You dont think there is any relationship at all in "eating the fruit of knowledge" and your statement there, m I mean i believe you, ok, i believe you cannot see the relationship, i couldnt either i guess, only i wonder how, now; i'm not even sure! All i can put it down to is i was so immersed in the Hegelian, and raised by the wolves employing it, that i could not relate it to my reasoning processes at all; iow
i just knew that that was all bull, and that "eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge" was all about good-n-evil, not about knowledge at all, yeh? See,
i knew, which is what made it so obvious to those who really knew that i didnt know at all, kinda like youre doing right now maybe? He who says he knows, really does not yet know at all like he should?