'Pure' Blood of Adam and Jesus?

[Ghada]

Some Christians are trying to teach a 'pure' vs unclean blood of the man Jesus vs a defiled blood of other men.

They say so, because that would be why He was accepted by God as the pure Lamb of sacrifice. As though His natural blood was what was so 'pure'.

And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth,

So, that settles that. No exceptions for Adam nor Jesus the man come in the same flesh and blood of all men.

In fact, Jesus was most hated among the racist Jewgenicists of His day, when He told them flatly that their flesh and blood had no profit with God. The same could be said of Christian white supremacists today.

It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

Jesus says plainly it is not His natural flesh and blood He speaks of, but is speaking of the spirit and life He lived.

Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:

Jesus was the pure Lamb without spot, not His blood. His pure spirit and blameless life without sinning, was why He could be appointed to be the Lamb and Advocate for the whole world with God the Father.

The one common flesh and blood of all men has nothing to do with honor of God, but only the purity of heart and life in Him.

And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Jesus words are of the spirit and life we live in the flesh, not of the flesh that all men have, and that He also came in with0out respect of person's bodies.

The reason for this stuff about 'pure' blood is simple: Justification for not walking as Jesus in the same flesh and blood He had.

 

[Ghada]

So, Jesus the man was the highest fulfillment of Jewgenics. Is the christ of white supremacy, the true Christ Jesus? Is the black race born of 'tainted' blood?

Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

So, were the disciples that turned back at this statement correct? They were shunning any man speaking of drinking their natural blood, which the law forbid?

When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

Jesus plainly says He speaks of the flesh and blood of the Spirit, which is doing the truth by obeying the Spirit, not of His own natural flesh and blood before His death.

Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently: Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,

And yet, just as the carnal minded Jews of the day, so we still have with us the carnal minded Christians, that actually think God's words are bounded by natural flesh and blood.

And so they come up with myths and fables that would make any Jewgenics or Supremacy racist happy (not to mention good ol' pagan hero cult worshippers). About how Adam and Jesus actually had supernatural immortal and pure bodies, rather than coming in the flesh of the rest of us schlubs.

Such teachings as Jesus' flesh was 'immortal', and His blood was 'pure' (which makes for another christ come not in the flesh and blood of man), is from the lie of any flesh and blood made by the Spirit of Christ is sinful.

And we all know the rotten core of such 'enlightened scholarship': merely to justify not living and walking like Him in the flesh.

The same Spirit that shaped Adam's body from the dust of the earth, and prepared Jesus' body from the flesh of Mary, also still makes us all with the same natural flesh and one blood.

 

[Ghada]

That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

So, are their many more on earth having righteously pure blood, vs unrighteously corrupt blood? Once again, only a Jewgenics and Supremacy racist would read the verse that way.

The blood is all one blood, as God declares. No exceptions. Therefore, it is the blood of the righteous being shed by the guilty.

Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

And it is men and women going after the same natural flesh, but in a strange way.

Because of such mythological teachings, some forbid blood transfusions, as though the common blood of all men has their personal beings in it.

The life of the flesh is in the blood, not the life of the soul and person, which is spirit and life, not flesh and blood.

When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

Getting all worked up about our own personal blood (Other than keeping our bodies alive), is as self-importantly ridiculous as what 'air' we breathe. As though the common air we all breathe is more 'rarified', when we 'personally' breathe it.

Just because the Word was made flesh, didn't make the flesh and blood any 'purer' or different from that of all men. Just as the air Jesus breathed was the same, when He breathed it.

I mean, that's the whole point about Jesus Christ coming in the flesh of man, isn't it? He condemned men in the same flesh and blood that all men live in. And so, all men in Christ Jesus can do the same.

But then, there's the rub. If the flesh and blood is the same, then why not the spirit and life on earth?

Only the Docetic 'spirit' and 'hero' makers try to say Jesus' flesh and blood was something entirely different and supernatural. Only the 'shape' of His body was the same.

 

[Ghada]

There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man. Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?

That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders. All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.

Jesus says plainly that what we take into the flesh and blood has nothing to do with good or evil.

It is not out of any 'sin' in the flesh and blood, that man sins by, but only out of a heart of lust.

If Jesus own blameless life had anything to do with His own 'special' flesh and blood, then He would be a lying hypocrite, commanding all men to repent and be pure in spirit, blameless in life and walk as He, while crippled with defiled flesh and blood different from Himself.

It would be the exact same as commanding a cripple to repent and walk the same as others.

Hypocrites that mix flesh and blood with sin, only do so to treat sinning as natural as flesh and blood.