.
I am at present undecided about whether or not the Ebola outbreak is real or a hoax. But
click here for a great article, to offset the one below. Ebola is my main topic of interest right now; I am trying to figure out if it is real or a hoax. IF Ebola is real, it is surpassing the 1.83 monthly expansion rate I spoke about earlier:
Mar, 2014 - Infected: 104 Dead: 62
Apr, 2014 - Infected: 194 Dead: 116
May, 2014 - Infected: 360 Dead: 216
Jun, 2014 - Infected: 670 Dead: 402
Jul, 2014 - Infected: 1,247 Dead: 748
Aug, 2014 - Infected: 2,319 Dead: 1,391
Sep 12, 2014: Already over 5,000 infected and 2400 dead - this is where it is obvious the curve is not being followed anymore. It appears to be going hockey stick.
Old prediction for end of Sep, 2014 - Infected: 4,313 Dead: 2,588 (we are already there)
Oct, 2014 - Infected: 8,022 Dead: 4,813
Nov, 2014 - Infected: 14,921 Dead: 8,953
Dec, 2014 - Infected: 27,753 Dead: 16,652
Jan, 2015 - Infected: 51,621 Dead: 30,973
Feb, 2015 - Infected: 96,016 Dead: 57,610
Mar, 2015 - Infected: 178,590 Dead: 107,154
Apr, 2015 - Infected: 332,177 Dead: 199,306
<< NEW PREDICTION HERE from people working Ebola now: 1.2 million dead here, which means if it is not a hoax and this is right, and it is not contained in Africa, the new trend will look more like this:
May, 2015 - Infected: 3,975,768 Dead: 2,385,461
Jun, 2015 - Infected: 7,394,928 Dead: 4,436,957
Jul, 2015 - Infected: 25,583,494 Dead: 15,350,096
Aug, 2015 - Infected: 47,585,299 Dead: 28,551,179
Sep, 2015 - Infected: 164,626,099 Dead: 98,775,660
Oct, 2015 - Infected: 306,204,545 Dead: 183,722,727
Nov, 2015 - Infected: 1,059,345,243 Dead: 635,607,146
Dec, 2015 - Infected: 1,970,382,153 Dead: 1,182,229,292
Jul, 2015 - Infected: 3,664,910,804 Dead: 2,198,946,482
Jan, 2016 - Infected: 6,816,734,096 Dead: 4,090,040,457
The large jumps are from subtracted months; I did not re-calculate the curve, other than to simply remove months that will not be there if the trend continues. Obviously it probably will not spread at this rate (if it is real at all); this is simply a calculation based upon what is happening now (if it is even real). And I have a good way to question the reality of it all: Why no Ebola pictures? A serious question must be raised about this current outbreak - why no pictures of classic Ebola? If this outbreak is real, and this is Ebola at all, it is so radically altered from it's earlier type that it is effectively not the same bug at all. Clearly, what we are seeing with this outbreak is not normal Ebola.
Do a dated Google search of the Ebola outbreak. Set Google to only recall pictures from the last month or so. You will discover that there is not one photo of Ebola with this outbreak, with all photos of real Ebola being drop-ins from past outbreaks. That is really enough to make me think that there either might not be an outbreak of Ebola, or that if there is, it is not the normal Ebola from the past. If people are dying (the latest number is 2400), it is not classic Ebola doing this. At any rate, the death rates are taking an exponential curve now according to the WHO, if this is even real at all.
In light of the fact that there are no pictures from this outbreak, I would like people to consider something
Consider that even in Africa there are cell phone cameras and internet. Why no Ebola photos? In fact, Liberia and Sierra Leon are English speaking countries, so any photos posted would be listed as Ebola, in English which would make it easy to find them in English. Why are we seeing NADA?
Even Al Jazeera's "Ebola, In Pictures" does not show anything. If they really put it in pictures, then SOMETHING, ANYTHING should be there. Instead, there is NADA.
The fact that quarantines are now supposedly in place cannot account for the lack of photos, because a cell phone can send a picture out of a quarantine zone.
Liberia is almost entirely wireless now, with almost 70 percent of Liberians having cell phones, and there are 4 cell phone companies there. Though only 7 percent of Liberians have internet, the rest can get on the web with cyber cafe's, and there would no doubt be a few in the quarantine zone. WHY NO EBOLA PICTURES THEN? If there was a disaster in progress you can bet SOMEONE, ANYONE, EVEN AN AMERICAN DOCTOR WHO WORKED THIS would have gotten a shot of Ebola out of there, with the classic symptoms. And Sierra Leon may not be as well off communication wise, but there are still more than 2 million cell phones there. Something stinks with this, reality on the ground is obviously not matching what the media is saying.
And there is another problem to address with all of this - and that is that
the people in the Ebola zone do not believe there is an Ebola outbreak. One would think that if Ebola was real, that in Africa, where people still talk and rumors spread by word of mouth
and almost 70 percent of the people have cell phones in Liberia, that even one case of Ebola would cause such a ruckus that they would not need the WHO to tell them something is going on.
The fact that the people there do not believe it is real stands as a serious red flag.
And how can you have an outbreak THAT BIG have no confirmed cases outside of the hot zone?
Quite frankly, the stories of American doctors getting cured are lies, because Ebola blows people away for months if not years because Ebola causes serious organ damage, and the doctors are already out and about, playing Tennis and Golf. They did not have Ebola.
So the question is then, is this Ebola outbreak just a false flag setup for forced vaccinations? I am seriously questioning if that is in fact the case. Millions of Liberian cell phone cams surely suggest it. All the Ebola photos that are associated with this outbreak show body bags and hospital wards with people who could be there for anything; there are no bleeding eyes and ears, no blistered arms, NOTHING showing at all from this outbreak, which if it was real should have been the most well documented and published of all. No other outbreak has matched this one in size, and no other outbreak happened with such a presence of the ability to document it. The lack of photographic proof in hard set terms is damning; it really does look like it could all be a ruse.
-- Jim
.