Then you're thinking of a technocratic way of determining an age that is acceptable to teach this information, so it's perhaps best to Google that and see what the expert consensus would be.
Well my classmates and I learned about it in middle school. I'm not saying going to a preschool or elementary school and teaching it.
Yes, it's biologically acceptable to be attracted to the opposite sex, but that doesn't mean it's also morally acceptable. This is absolutely a question of morals and ethics because you're potentially teaching a child who is not capable of fully understanding and applying the subject matter when this is pushed upon them too early. The only way it's not acceptable is if you accept (and hold) a technocratic viewpoint.
So, you're saying that it's not moral to love someone of the opposite sex? How will people procreate, because you know how people make babies right?
I don't see why teaching children what sex is, why it happens, and why it can be dangerous is a bad thing.
Children already know about sex, I've heard stories of middle school children having sex so saying that if they found out they would go out and do it doesn't really apply to this generation. Many already know enough to actually do it, although they may not know the consequences of it. It's not like it's some new thing that's a total secret to people, trust me.
And aren't there statistics that show that in places where there is education about what sex is and the consequences of it have a lower rate of unwanted and/or teen pregnancies? I'll have to look it up, but I'm going between this forum and homework so it'll be slow.
Ransom question, do you have something against a technocracy? I actually had to look it up to see what it was, I don't see how it's bad. People who actually know what they're talking about debating and deciding what would be the most beneficial decision.