Cultural Marxists claim if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth. Just another lie. A perversion of Evolution. A lie does not “evolve” into the truth – no matter how effective indoctrination and brain washing may be.
While I abhor the adage ‘all things in moderation,’ I recognize and apply the axiom that all things that exist have limits. These mantras appeal to a women’s tendency to succumb to the sin of coveting, e.g., you do not want more and better, right? What are the proper limits of these mantras? Let’s examine the lies of 4 Feminist Mantras.
- Don’t Need A Man
- It’s Woman’s Right to Choose
- A Man Has to Live Up To His Responsibilities
- Don’t Settle
1. Don’t Need A Man
This contradicts the original way feminists pitched their evil ideology to men. With various “waves” of feminist evolution, becoming ever more shrill and man-hating, I’m old enough to recall the assertion of how feminism is good for men; that with women working, it takes financial pressure off the man.
In this rendition, men were still acknowledged – and dear I say,
respected - as the head of house. The bread winner, yes. But this burden could be lightened by the fruit of feminism. So, feminism would assist couples having a happier life and better relationship because a man would not be so financially stressed. The mantra that today’s women “Don’t Need A Man” is the exact opposite.
From assisting a man to displacing a man entirely. This mantra destroys the meaningful relationship completely.
The reason I go to the market for a hammer is that I need a hammer. If woman “Don’t Need A Man” why is she with him?
It reduces the highest relationship to the most superficial. Predictably this philosophical position turns feminists into whores, rebelling against the truth and embarking on the licentious “slut shaming” campaign to make feminists feel better about their whoredom. This explains why a new mantra is emerging, “Body count doesn’t matter.” The language ‘body count’ reveals the predatory nature of today’s man-hating feminists. From needing a man to needing 100’s of men and they are still not satisfied, sexually or any other way with their relationships with men! Way to go feminism.
After my divorce, I used this as a filter. If a woman could not admit needing a man in general, she will not admit needing me, in particular. And there is no reason for me to be with her. It remains a foundational principle. My current wife lets me know she needs me all the time.
2. It’s Woman’s Right to Choose
The next 2 mantras are paired and perverted in the same way, extending from its abortion origins to all things.
This mantra implies 2 lies. 1st, it denies a man’s right to choose. That is, it denies man’s reproductive rights.
You cannot claim equality while simultaneously only focusing on one sex.
3. A Man Has to Live Up To His Responsibilities
Again, you cannot claim equality while simultaneously only focusing on one sex. When the sex that is focused on is the man, no freedom to choose is acknowledged, only slavery of responsibility thrust on him without choice. At the same time, the woman has no responsibility.
It’s just as valid to say
it’s a man’s right to choose and a woman has to live up to her responsibilities. Conditioned to be hypersensitive of female oppression, the mantra’s oppression jumps out at you when the sexes are reversed. No feminist dare express this equality!
4. Don’t Settle
Paradoxically, this mantra contradicts the ‘
it’s a woman’s right to choose’ mantra. This mantra abrogates the enticing freedom of choice mantra. Reinforcing whoredom is the mantra prohibiting decision making, which is final. If you make a decision, it is final and that is settling. Here, she is commanded NOT to choose. The oppression of the evil ideology exposed.
The mantra refers to a feminist’s relationship with a man and seeks to leverage her man-hating to catapult this to all things (like the previous 2 mantra’s). No matter how good anything in life might be, a feminist is philosophically prevented from embracing it fully, from making it her own because … that would be settling.
This philosophy makes it impossible for a feminist to commit – to anything. Sure, this man might be a 1%er but what if a 0.1%er woos her? This undermines the social contract. Everything is unstable, temporary, subject to fracture at any time for any reason. Nothing of value can be built on such a foundation. This feminist mantra not only creates virtue-less women, it eliminates her moral agency, reducing her to a slave of her own whims and negotiating against herself.