Barrd
His Humble Servant
I'm torn on this issue, to be honest with you.kepha31 said:That's ok, I think the feet washing topic has been exhausted anyway.
Of all the women mentioned in the NT, none of them were ordained. Junia, who is "of note among the Apostles" does not make her an apostle, it means that among the Apostles her holiness was noteworthy.
Deaconess Pheobe assisted in the church with baptisms. Again, she was never ordained to the priesthood.
Gen. 3:15; Luke 1:26-55; John 19:26; Rev. 12:1- Mary is God's greatest creation, was the closest person to Jesus, and yet Jesus did not choose her to become a priest. God chose only men to be priests to reflect the complimentarity of the sexes. Just as the man (the royal priest) gives natural life to the woman in the marital covenant, the ministerial priest gives supernatural life in the New Covenant sacraments.
Judges 17:10; 18:19 – fatherhood and priesthood are synonymous terms. Micah says, “Stay with me, and be to me a father and a priest.” Fathers/priests give life, and mothers receive and nurture life. This reflects God our Father who gives the life of grace through the Priesthood of His Divine Son, and Mother Church who receives the life of grace and nourishes her children. In summary, women cannot be priests because women cannot be fathers.
Mark 16:9; Luke 7: 37-50; John 8:3-11 - Jesus allowed women to uniquely join in His mission, exalting them above cultural norms. His decision not to ordain women had nothing to do with culture. The Gospel writers are also clear that women participated in Jesus' ministry and, unlike men, never betrayed Jesus. Women have always been held with the highest regard in the Church (e.g., the Church's greatest saint and model of faith is a woman; the Church's constant teaching on the dignity of motherhood; the Church's understanding of humanity as being the Bride united to Christ, etc.).
read more here
The Catholic Church cannot ordain women to the priesthood because she does not have the authority to do so. But it has nothing to do with inequality.
"...And - even beyond the Blessed Virgin - there are plenty of women role models in Catholic history to look up to and emulate: St. Teresa of Avila, or St. Catherine of Siena (who rebuked popes), or St. Therese of Lisieux, or St. Clare, or St. Hildegard of Bingen, or Mother Teresa, or Dorothy Day, or Blessed Edith Stein, or Deborah, Esther, Ruth, and many other biblical heroines. Theological and sexual liberals often appear to look at things as if they were a matter of social psychology, rather than the biblical and Christian theology of creation and spirituality: ultimately the mystery of Christ and His Church.
Role Differentiation is Not Inequality
There is no inequality here whatsoever (e.g., Gal 3:28). If women are unequal to men in orthodox (i.e., Nicene and Chalcedonian) Christianity of whatever stripe, then Jesus is not equal to the Father, since He subjected Himself to the Father (Phil 2:5-8) and even to Mary and Joseph (Lk 2:51). The Holy Trinity is a very apt analogy because it offers a clear example of an equality which nevertheless includes (by its very nature) subjection and differential roles - exactly analogous to marriage and male ordination. Thus, radical feminism logically leads to heterodoxy with regard to the Holy Trinity, or else undue skepticism towards the Bible. That's why sexual and theological liberalism are so closely allied - it is no coincidence. .."
read more here
I have more to say on the matter but the post is long enough.
My contention is this. Gender, as we know it, did not exist before God created it. God, Himself, is neither male nor female. He is simply God. The male pronoun means nothing...no more than calling both men and women "mankind".
Now, I enjoy being a woman. I'm a feminist in that I have three daughters, and I will object firmly to anyone who says that they should not pursue any career they wish, up to and including preaching the gospel of God.
However, I'm a traditionalist (is that the right word?) when it comes to the male-female relationship. I like having my chair pulled out, or having doors opened for me...those little courtesies mean a lot to me. OTH...and please, I do not mean to brag...I have often wondered if it might have more to do with being a cute little blonde than it does my gender...I've seen the same guys who seem so eager to do these things for me not quite so eager to do them for other women who they don't see as being attractive...and that is just wrong. Ha! I suppose that, as I get older and really need those courtesies, those guys will be doing them for younger prettier women, and ignoring me.
But I digress. You say that Junia was not an apostle, but merely someone the apostles admired. I'm not so sure.
Rom 16:7 Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.
Was Andronicus an apostle? And what were Andronicus or Junia doing in prison, if they had not been preaching the gospel? Not that it was impossible I suppose, but I do wonder. They were both kinsmen of Paul's, and they were both Christians before Paul had had his Damascus experience. Presumably, Paul was not aware of that while he was on his rampage against Christians.
Had they walked with Christ? Were they among the 120 in the upper room at Pentecost?
Come to think of it, how many of the 120, if any, were of the female persuasion?
Just some thoughts. Remember, I am not a Catholic. Now, if I totally agreed with the Catholic faith and doctrine, I would be a Catholic, don't you think?