Tips on successful debating

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

FHII

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2011
4,833
2,494
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
A Guide To “Successful” Debating On Christian Forums
 
Debates on Christian forums can be fun and rewarding, but they can also be frustrating and heated at times. Through years of research, I have found some simple techniques you can use to make your debating points stronger and thus, help you become more successful while debating.

1. If someone makes a point that goes totally against what you believe, use strong adjectives to smear that point.
For example saying, “that ungodly doctrine” or “the heretical doctrine” is much stronger than simply saying “that doctrine”. Of course, throw a “very” in there too. “That very ungodly doctrine” is much stronger than anything containing just the facts.

2. While not always advisable, the same technique can be used with people.
You may do well to use this technique on dead people or those who are extremely unlikely to enter the debate. Calvin, Luther, Billy Graham and the Pope, for example. Calling them “heretics” (or even better, “ungodly heretics” or even “very ungodly heretics“) will allow your point to be stronger. If you feel you must use this against the person you are debating, be prepared for that person to do the same, or cry foul! In that case, you should use them more often.

3. Circular reasoning is a strong ally.
Make your point, provide evidence, then more evidence, then claim all your evidence is true because of the first point you made.

4. Long posts are useful.
Constantly give long history, philosophy and numerous quotations of scripture to make your point. You have plenty of all of these at your disposal. The longer your post, the greater the chances are that your opponent will become bored with you or miss something you said. If he becomes bored, you win. If he misses something you said, key in on that.

5. Study and use early Christian writers and philosophers (who didn’t write scripture) if you can’t find scriptural support.
Augustine is usually a good place to start. If you are not schooled in their writings, Google and Wikipedia and be extremely useful to bring you up to speed.

6. Search the internet for essays that support your point of view; copy and paste.
This works for the same reasons points number 4 and 5 work.

7. When possible, attach your adversary and his point of view to Gnosticism, occults and any other line of thinking you feel is wrong.
As with many of these techniques, this will make your point stronger. For example, claim someone is a Calvinist if they believe something he believed or shows even the slightest likeness of his teachings. I am unable to give an example on how to attach a belief to Gnosticism, but some research (Google or Wikipedia) will be useful. If you can successfully label your opponent to a label that is unorthodox, you have won probably 2/3 the battle.

8. If things get too difficult for you, start an immediate discourse on “love”.
You can also accuse your adversary of not having “love”, which will weaken his credibility. This is also a trump card. When things get too hot for you, you can always question whether he has the love of God. If you can convince enough people he doesn’t, then you have won.

9. Use the “Holy Spirit”.
Remember, God talks directly to you without the Bible, and he gives you messages he hasn’t given anyone else. Rely on this and state “The Holy Spirit directly told me this is what this verse means!” for example. Or simply say an angel told me so. Remember: no one else can hear those voices inside your head. Only you.

10. If confronted with a particular scripture that counters your argument, claim the scripture is out of context.
This technique can be used at almost anytime, but you may be asked to “put it in context”. It is beneficial if you can, but it is not necessary. If you can’t put it into context, ignore it. The fact that you deemed it out of context is enough.

11. Claim a scripture or set of scriptures was twisted to make your opponent say what he wants it to.
There is no need to defend the use of this technique. Simply claim your argument and interpretation is correct and your opponent’s interpretation is in error.

12. If your opponent brings forth an argument you are having problems with, simply excuse it as irrelevant to the conversation.
There is no need to explain why. The reasons why are pretty irrelevant to the conversation.

13. When confronted with a verse contrary to your beliefs, check other versions of the Bible.
Many times you can find a Bible that says something slightly different that will more fit your point of view.

14. Rely on the original Greek/Hebrew when needed.
Many times you can find your way out of a difficult situation by focusing on a word and questioning its real meaning. Furthermore, original Greek and Hebrew words had multiple meanings; much like we have multiple meanings for English words. There are a plethora of paths you can take by simply switching languages.

15. Find outside arguments and beliefs your opponent holds to.
Though they may have nothing to do with your current debate, they can be used to question his or her credibility.

16. When possible, use your age or experience as an ally.
This probably can’t be done if you are under the age of 40 or haven’t been going to Church more than 10 years. It can however be effective against those who aren’t 40 years old or haven’t been going to Church for more than 10 years. It can with marginal success be used with someone as experienced as you.

17. Be quick to point out if a point isn’t in the Bible.
This allows you to use the phrase “Doctrines of men”.

18. Be quick to point out if something is in the Bible.
After all, if its not in the Bible, it must be wrong. This may seem contrary to point number 17, but that is irrelevant to the conversation.

19. Be vague as possible at times when addressing who you are talking to.
Paul may have called out Peter in Galatians, but that doesn’t mean you have to. You can literally tear into someone and their doctrine, as well as claim they are “of the devil” and still look good by not addressing them directly. If you get called out by an individual, simply say you weren’t addressing anyone in particular.

20. If you are having trouble finding a verse that supports your point of view, use standard verses that can apply to any situation.
A good example is Isaiah 55:9 “For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.” Use of this verse can apply to a variety of arguments while not requiring you to explain it. Another good verse is John 21:25. “And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.” You can use these verses to support almost any notion that you don’t have scripture on.

21. Attack one weakness and ignore strengths.
Look for “chinks in the armor”. You won’t be held responsible for not addressing solid points your opponent makes. But you can champion over weaknesses.

22. The “All Out War” approach.
Just go at it. Proclaim your opponent just simply of the devil. Shower everyone else with kind words to get them on your side, but use venom against your opponent. Use all the techniques given, and create situations to use them if they don’t apply. Just smear the hell out of your opponent. Make him look bad, try to shame him, and get as many on your side as you can.
 


In addition, some techniques can be used to build your credibility and “holiness”. They may not directly strengthen your argument, but they will make you look better:

End each post with “I’ll keep you in prayer that God may show you the error of your ways.” An alternative is to suggest your opponent pray about it more.

Use obscure words during your conversation. Bill O’Reilly was very good at this.

Never use the word “ass”. Use “mule” or “donkey” instead

Brethren, if you use these techniques, you will come out looking holier that anyone in a debate. Even if you lose the debate. Above all, use time and inertia as your ally. Keep telling your point, and eventually it will stick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiteKnuckle

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
52
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Here is a post I wrote several years ago and decided to re-post after recently encountering a rather nasty Fundamentalist Christian. Once again, here are my observations about the conversational style of people who are more interested in winning an argument, rather than learning.

After spending years debating James White, I have noticed common tactics employed by people who want to win at any cost rather than seek a mutual understanding of the facts or even work toward a mutual disagreement. Ann Coulter is a good example of a political satirist who engages in this sort of rhetoric. Let's take a closer look, shall we?

1. Make an outrageous claim. It doesn't matter if the Pope is or is not speaking infallibly, or if you take a comment out of context, or if the group you belong to is just as guilty as the group you are making accusations against, because the goal is not to be fair minded or even handed or even accurate; all you need to be concerned with is igniting an emotional response from your opponent rather than a logical one. Remember, you are always right and your opponent is always wrong; your job is to simply supply enough emotional rope for your opponent to hang himself.

2. Rely on Mocking or Sarcasm to ignite passion: If you are of a conservative ilk, rely on a mocking, morally superior tone to deliver your message (James White, Ann Coulter, etc); if you happen to be liberal use a lot of sarcastic humor to exalt yourself above your opponent's attempts at presenting himself/herself as morally superior (John Stewart, Steven Colbert, Al Franken). BTW, liberals get the most points when they present themselves so convincingly that even conservatives mistake them for a conservative! (Archie Bunker)

3. Do not give an inch: If your opponent happens to stumble upon a true statement, ignore, deny or re-frame the conversation! In all cases, never concede even a minor point to your opponent.

4. Make your opponent work harder: Always remember that you are right, regardless of the facts presented, and you will eventually prove it by weathering any storm that may be created due to the information your opponent happens to give you. Most importantly, make sure he spends most of his time researching the topic; you must put him in a place where he feels like he has to prove you wrong. If he presents troubling information to you about your own position simply refuse to acknowledge it. The fact is you set the pace and the agenda of the debate; your opponent is either a brainwashed innocent or at worst, a conniving, interloper who has no right to challenge your superior position, and only appears to have the nerve to do so without merit. Most importantly, he is challenging you intentionally; therefore it is the "Christian" thing to do to put him back in his place.

5. Do not bother reading posts or listening to responses from your opponent: After all, reading your opponent's posts may ignite emotions within yourself, or take your mind off your primary goal, winning. Instead of reading, skim your opponent's post for statements that can be molded to aid you in your ultimate goal. The best statements are usually the most irrelevant to your opponent's point - why re-post something meaningful or relevant? Oh, and make sure you continue to apply the steady drumbeat of either mocking / moral superiority, or sarcastic humor.

6. Stay the Course!: Eventually your opponent with either hang himself or simply tire of the interaction; in both cases, you must declare victory immediately. Like any good staring contest or series of tic-tac-toe draws, it is not the person that presents the best case who wins, but the person who is left standing.
 

FHII

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2011
4,833
2,494
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There are some who will post additional rules of debating. These people and their posts are very ungodly and are extremely involved in heresy and possibly gnosticism. Or they may be Catholic. Either way...These people probably believe in Christmas also. That's proves they are wrong.

They will bring out six points and none of them can be supported with Biblical scripture! Then they twist scripture and take it out of context. Ignore them or you will go to hell just like them.

They simply don't have the Love of God. They don't understand that God is love.

I will pray for them!


:)
 

PropphecyStudent

New Member
Jan 6, 2012
139
0
0
A Guide To “Successful” Debating On Christian Forums
 
Debates on Christian forums can be fun and rewarding, but they can also be frustrating and heated at times. Through years of research, I have found some simple techniques you can use to make your debating points stronger and thus, help you become more successful while debating.

1. If someone makes a point that goes totally against what you believe, use strong adjectives to smear that point.
For example saying, “that ungodly doctrine” or “the heretical doctrine” is much stronger than simply saying “that doctrine”. Of course, throw a “very” in there too. “That very ungodly doctrine” is much stronger than anything containing just the facts.

2. While not always advisable, the same technique can be used with people.
You may do well to use this technique on dead people or those who are extremely unlikely to enter the debate. Calvin, Luther, Billy Graham and the Pope, for example. Calling them “heretics” (or even better, “ungodly heretics” or even “very ungodly heretics“) will allow your point to be stronger. If you feel you must use this against the person you are debating, be prepared for that person to do the same, or cry foul! In that case, you should use them more often.

3. Circular reasoning is a strong ally.
Make your point, provide evidence, then more evidence, then claim all your evidence is true because of the first point you made.

4. Long posts are useful.
Constantly give long history, philosophy and numerous quotations of scripture to make your point. You have plenty of all of these at your disposal. The longer your post, the greater the chances are that your opponent will become bored with you or miss something you said. If he becomes bored, you win. If he misses something you said, key in on that.

5. Study and use early Christian writers and philosophers (who didn’t write scripture) if you can’t find scriptural support.
Augustine is usually a good place to start. If you are not schooled in their writings, Google and Wikipedia and be extremely useful to bring you up to speed.

6. Search the internet for essays that support your point of view; copy and paste.
This works for the same reasons points number 4 and 5 work.

7. When possible, attach your adversary and his point of view to Gnosticism, occults and any other line of thinking you feel is wrong.
As with many of these techniques, this will make your point stronger. For example, claim someone is a Calvinist if they believe something he believed or shows even the slightest likeness of his teachings. I am unable to give an example on how to attach a belief to Gnosticism, but some research (Google or Wikipedia) will be useful. If you can successfully label your opponent to a label that is unorthodox, you have won probably 2/3 the battle.

8. If things get too difficult for you, start an immediate discourse on “love”.
You can also accuse your adversary of not having “love”, which will weaken his credibility. This is also a trump card. When things get too hot for you, you can always question whether he has the love of God. If you can convince enough people he doesn’t, then you have won.

9. Use the “Holy Spirit”.
Remember, God talks directly to you without the Bible, and he gives you messages he hasn’t given anyone else. Rely on this and state “The Holy Spirit directly told me this is what this verse means!” for example. Or simply say an angel told me so. Remember: no one else can hear those voices inside your head. Only you.

10. If confronted with a particular scripture that counters your argument, claim the scripture is out of context.
This technique can be used at almost anytime, but you may be asked to “put it in context”. It is beneficial if you can, but it is not necessary. If you can’t put it into context, ignore it. The fact that you deemed it out of context is enough.

11. Claim a scripture or set of scriptures was twisted to make your opponent say what he wants it to.
There is no need to defend the use of this technique. Simply claim your argument and interpretation is correct and your opponent’s interpretation is in error.

12. If your opponent brings forth an argument you are having problems with, simply excuse it as irrelevant to the conversation.
There is no need to explain why. The reasons why are pretty irrelevant to the conversation.

13. When confronted with a verse contrary to your beliefs, check other versions of the Bible.
Many times you can find a Bible that says something slightly different that will more fit your point of view.

14. Rely on the original Greek/Hebrew when needed.
Many times you can find your way out of a difficult situation by focusing on a word and questioning its real meaning. Furthermore, original Greek and Hebrew words had multiple meanings; much like we have multiple meanings for English words. There are a plethora of paths you can take by simply switching languages.

15. Find outside arguments and beliefs your opponent holds to.
Though they may have nothing to do with your current debate, they can be used to question his or her credibility.

16. When possible, use your age or experience as an ally.
This probably can’t be done if you are under the age of 40 or haven’t been going to Church more than 10 years. It can however be effective against those who aren’t 40 years old or haven’t been going to Church for more than 10 years. It can with marginal success be used with someone as experienced as you.

17. Be quick to point out if a point isn’t in the Bible.
This allows you to use the phrase “Doctrines of men”.

18. Be quick to point out if something is in the Bible.
After all, if its not in the Bible, it must be wrong. This may seem contrary to point number 17, but that is irrelevant to the conversation.

19. Be vague as possible at times when addressing who you are talking to.
Paul may have called out Peter in Galatians, but that doesn’t mean you have to. You can literally tear into someone and their doctrine, as well as claim they are “of the devil” and still look good by not addressing them directly. If you get called out by an individual, simply say you weren’t addressing anyone in particular.

20. If you are having trouble finding a verse that supports your point of view, use standard verses that can apply to any situation.
A good example is Isaiah 55:9 “For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.” Use of this verse can apply to a variety of arguments while not requiring you to explain it. Another good verse is John 21:25. “And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.” You can use these verses to support almost any notion that you don’t have scripture on.

21. Attack one weakness and ignore strengths.
Look for “chinks in the armor”. You won’t be held responsible for not addressing solid points your opponent makes. But you can champion over weaknesses.

22. The “All Out War” approach.
Just go at it. Proclaim your opponent just simply of the devil. Shower everyone else with kind words to get them on your side, but use venom against your opponent. Use all the techniques given, and create situations to use them if they don’t apply. Just smear the hell out of your opponent. Make him look bad, try to shame him, and get as many on your side as you can.
 


In addition, some techniques can be used to build your credibility and “holiness”. They may not directly strengthen your argument, but they will make you look better:

End each post with “I’ll keep you in prayer that God may show you the error of your ways.” An alternative is to suggest your opponent pray about it more.

Use obscure words during your conversation. Bill O’Reilly was very good at this.

Never use the word “ass”. Use “mule” or “donkey” instead

Brethren, if you use these techniques, you will come out looking holier that anyone in a debate. Even if you lose the debate. Above all, use time and inertia as your ally. Keep telling your point, and eventually it will stick.

LOLOL,

The very most funny, and very most true post I've read in a long time. And if I might suggest one more technique for Forums, -- complain to the administration that your opposition is diverting the thread.

And if I might add an ever so insignificant point to your observation that one NEVER call someone as "ass", but merely a "mule" or "donkey", -- never directly accuse someone of liking to "look at little girls", but simply suggest that "some" "like to look at little girls". This way the assassination is neither overt nor direct!

Thanks FHII for a timely topic, and Aspen for your equally astute input.

:lol:
 

WhiteKnuckle

New Member
Mar 29, 2009
866
42
0
47
If none of that works.........

shout_racist_poster-p228380476149856254t5ta_400.jpg
 

prism

Blood-Soaked
Jan 24, 2011
1,895
834
113
So. Cal
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Drats they have revealed my secrets, time to find another forum.
 

rockytopva

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Dec 31, 2010
5,184
2,390
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
23. Curse - Remember to belittle and downgrade the individual. Since they are cursed they deserve every line you give them!
24. Damn - If people don't agree with you that means they are a heratic - Don't for get to damn them to hell while you are cursing them!
 
"God is truth, so how well a person serves the Lord is not dependent on how artfully he can defend his doctrines, but on his willingness to seek out and follow the truth." - Ellis Skolfield.
Sadly many will resort to any tactic to defend their doctrine. In many cases if they would put as much effort into searching for the truth as they do defending their doctrines they just might be surprised.
 

prism

Blood-Soaked
Jan 24, 2011
1,895
834
113
So. Cal
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
20 something.
Seek out a weak opponent and persistently pound on him/her...that'll make you look like a verbal warrior.
 

FHII

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2011
4,833
2,494
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Aspen, thanks for letting me toy with you on that.... Of course I don't mean it! It was done in humor and to make a point. I'm not saying I haven't used some of these tactics myself. In fact, sometimes they are legit. If a piece of scripture is out of context, by all means say so... But as a curtesy, explain it and put it in context. There are also times to say, hey... that ain't in the Bible.

However, I see these tactics used all the time, and politicians use them too. I'm not saying don't use them... And I'm certainly not making another "lets love each other" post.... That lasts for all of 1 minute! I'm just saying lets be aware of them -- not when others use such tactics, but when YOU do! I stack that up against myself too.

On a side note.... The "ass"/donkey comment. Look, in the KJV and probably a few others, God said the word "ass". It ain't a bad word! I was looking at it from that point of view.... Not suggesting anyone call another an "ass". It's simply a pet peeve of mine that people and sometimes forums (and not the fault of the administrator) censor what God said was a good term to use. For example, did Balaam's ass or Balaams donkey talk to him? My Pastor has a hilarious sermon playing on words when we use the term "ass", and it makes a good point.... When you argue with your own "ass", you have a serious problem! And when you start kicking your own ass and your ass talks back to you, it's gone from bad to worse! Now, we look at that statement and it makes sense. Like the Eagles said, "don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy." But Balaam really did argue with his own "ass" (donkey). But of course, he was also arguing with himself and with God. He was so mad he didn't skip a beat when this donkey started talking to him.... A normal person would've jumped back and said, "wait a minute.... This animal is talking!" But Balaam just kept arguing.

God's got a "heck" of a sense of humor! Probably the funniest thing in the Bible! Now, see my point?

I like this forum... Folks.... Take a step back in debates... By all means, continue debating. Iron sharpens Iron. But just be aware of what you are doing. I like the other adendums to the tips too! Good points, folks!