Who Would Vote For Kamala Harris?

[April_Rose]

Seriously,.. I mean she clearly supports abortion and I don't think that anybody likes her.

 

[Bobby Jo]

To All,

This is a sensitive subject, as my wife observed that Kamala sits with her knees apart ( -- which I've never noticed -- ) as though she either wants to be considered "one of the boys", or is sending a different message. And of course I WILL NOT post the photo-shopped image of "her" in an exaggerated pose.

Equally, I will not detail her "methods" to gain political power and influence, but I WILL REFUTE the accusation that her behavior matches someone who accepts "payments" -- because that's an insult to poor women who make bad choices in life.


Biden & Harris. Quite a "match" ...
Bobby Jo

 

[Prayer Warrior]

I would NEVER vote for any politician who has said that keeping abortion legal is THE issue!

The following shows Kamala Harris's support of abortion.

Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.

Harris scores 100% by NARAL on pro-choice voting record - NARAL Pro-Choice California
For over thirty years, NARAL Pro-Choice America has been the political arm of the pro-choice movement and a strong advocate of reproductive freedom and choice. NARAL Pro-Choice America's mission is to protect and preserve the right to choose while promoting policies and programs that improve women's health and make abortion less necessary. NARAL Pro-Choice America works to educate Americans and officeholders about reproductive rights and health issues and elect pro-choice candidates at all levels of government. The NARAL ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.

Source: NARAL website 03n-NARAL on Dec 31, 2003​

​

Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions.
Harris co-sponsored S.217 & H.R.448
Congressional Summary: Congress finds the following:

• 
  Access to safe, legal abortion services has been hindered in various ways, including blockades of health care facilities; restrictions on insurance coverage; restrictions on minors' ability to obtain services; and requirements that single out abortion providers.
• These restrictions harm women's health by reducing access to the other essential health care services offered by the providers targeted by the restrictions, including contraceptive services.
• The cumulative effect of these numerous restrictions has been that a woman's ability to exercise her constitutional rights is dependent on the State in which she lives.
• It is the purpose of this Act to protect women's health by ensuring that abortion services will continue to be available and that abortion providers are not singled out for medically unwarranted restrictions

Opponents reasons for voting NAY:(National Review, July 17, 2014): During hearings on S. 1696, Senators heard many myths from abortion proponents about the "need" for the bill's evisceration of all life-affirming legislation.

• Myth: Life-affirming laws are enacted "under the false pretext of health and safety."
  Fact: Induced abortion is associated with significant risks and potential harms to women.
• Myth: "Where abortion services are restricted and unavailable, abortions still occur and are mostly unsafe."
  Fact: Where abortion is restricted, maternal mortality rates have decreased.
• Myth: Admitting privileges laws are "not medically justified."
  Fact: Women with abortion complications are told to go to an emergency department. This would constitute malpractice in any other scenario.
• Myth: Ultrasounds and their descriptions are "cruel and inhumane."
  Fact: Allowing women the opportunity to view their ultrasounds serves an important role in providing informed consent, enabling women to exercise true choice.

Source: Women's Health Protection Act 15_S217 on Jan 21, 2015
​

Supports public funding for abortion services.

Harris supports the CC survey question on Planned Parenthood
The Christian Coalition Voter Guide inferred whether candidates agree or disagree with the statement, 'Public Funding of Abortions (Such as Govt. Health Benefits and Planned Parenthood)' The Christian Coalition notes, "You can help make sure that voters have the facts BEFORE they cast their votes. We have surveyed candidates in the most competitive congressional races on the issues that are important to conservatives."

Source: Christian Coalition Survey 16_CC1a on Nov 8, 2016​

​

SOURCE: Kamala Harris on Abortion​

 

[Bobby Jo]

To All,

This is a sensitive subject, as my wife observed that Kamala sits with her knees apart ( -- which I've never noticed -- ) as though she either wants to be considered "one of the boys", or is sending a different message. And of course I WILL NOT post the photo-shopped image of "her" in an exaggerated pose.

Equally, I will not detail her "methods" to gain political power and influence, but I WILL REFUTE the accusation that her behavior matches someone who accepts "payments" -- because that's an insult to poor women who make bad choices in life.


Biden & Harris. Quite a "match" ...
Bobby Jo

Well, apparently new text messages are coming to light which document that Hunter Biden was "THANKED" by a member of the Burisma Board for arraigning a meeting with Joe Biden.

Seems Hunter DID earn his millions by making RUSSIAN CONNECTIONS.


So maybe it'll be a KAMALA Ticket, -- without JOE?
Bobby Jo

 

[Bobby Jo]

...
So maybe it'll be a KAMALA Ticket, -- without JOE?
Bobby Jo

Sounds suspiciously similar to the North Carolina Senate Democrat candidate Cal Cunningham with his EXTRA-MARITAL AFFAIRS (and hint's it may be MORE than the TWO which have been exposed). And he apparently quit campaigning to avoid having to answer any NEW QUESTIONS.

HEY JOE, WE HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT RUSSIA ...; and then silence.

Bobby Jo

 

[April_Rose]

I would NEVER vote for any politician who has said that keeping abortion legal is THE issue!

The following shows Kamala Harris's support of abortion.

Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.

Harris scores 100% by NARAL on pro-choice voting record - NARAL Pro-Choice California
For over thirty years, NARAL Pro-Choice America has been the political arm of the pro-choice movement and a strong advocate of reproductive freedom and choice. NARAL Pro-Choice America's mission is to protect and preserve the right to choose while promoting policies and programs that improve women's health and make abortion less necessary. NARAL Pro-Choice America works to educate Americans and officeholders about reproductive rights and health issues and elect pro-choice candidates at all levels of government. The NARAL ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.

Source: NARAL website 03n-NARAL on Dec 31, 2003







Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions.​

Harris co-sponsored S.217 & H.R.448
Congressional Summary: Congress finds the following:

• 
  Access to safe, legal abortion services has been hindered in various ways, including blockades of health care facilities; restrictions on insurance coverage; restrictions on minors' ability to obtain services; and requirements that single out abortion providers.
• These restrictions harm women's health by reducing access to the other essential health care services offered by the providers targeted by the restrictions, including contraceptive services.
• The cumulative effect of these numerous restrictions has been that a woman's ability to exercise her constitutional rights is dependent on the State in which she lives.
• It is the purpose of this Act to protect women's health by ensuring that abortion services will continue to be available and that abortion providers are not singled out for medically unwarranted restrictions

Opponents reasons for voting NAY:(National Review, July 17, 2014): During hearings on S. 1696, Senators heard many myths from abortion proponents about the "need" for the bill's evisceration of all life-affirming legislation.

• Myth: Life-affirming laws are enacted "under the false pretext of health and safety."
  Fact: Induced abortion is associated with significant risks and potential harms to women.
• Myth: "Where abortion services are restricted and unavailable, abortions still occur and are mostly unsafe."
  Fact: Where abortion is restricted, maternal mortality rates have decreased.
• Myth: Admitting privileges laws are "not medically justified."
  Fact: Women with abortion complications are told to go to an emergency department. This would constitute malpractice in any other scenario.
• Myth: Ultrasounds and their descriptions are "cruel and inhumane."
  Fact: Allowing women the opportunity to view their ultrasounds serves an important role in providing informed consent, enabling women to exercise true choice.

Source: Women's Health Protection Act 15_S217 on Jan 21, 2015
​

Supports public funding for abortion services.

Harris supports the CC survey question on Planned Parenthood
The Christian Coalition Voter Guide inferred whether candidates agree or disagree with the statement, 'Public Funding of Abortions (Such as Govt. Health Benefits and Planned Parenthood)' The Christian Coalition notes, "You can help make sure that voters have the facts BEFORE they cast their votes. We have surveyed candidates in the most competitive congressional races on the issues that are important to conservatives."

Source: Christian Coalition Survey 16_CC1a on Nov 8, 2016​

​

SOURCE: Kamala Harris on Abortion​

Sorry,.. I stopped reading when I saw the words safe and abortion in the same sentence.

 

[Heart2Soul]

That's a true Christian that is. @aspen,.. I'm taking you off of ignore (because this is what caused it in the first place) because even though you made me extremely angry by this since she is a clear baby killer,.. I want to know your explanation for this and I sure hope it's a good one. (In a lot of other forums it's against the rules to state that you're putting somebody on ignore,.. but that doesn't appear to be the case for here.)

No it isn't against the forum rules to tell someone they are on ignore....
However it is against forum rules to single out a member in a thread and bring public attention to them. It is harrassment and character attack. I would ask that you edit your OP and remove all content pertaining to this member and take it to a private conversation.
Thank you.

 

[April_Rose]

No it isn't against the forum rules to tell someone they are on ignore....
However it is against forum rules to single out a member in a thread and bring public attention to them. It is harrassment and character attack. I would ask that you edit your OP and remove all content pertaining to this member and take it to a private conversation.
Thank you.

Sorry, I just edited it and that wasn't my intention,.. but you probably know me enough by now to know that I'm not like that purposely. :)

 

[Heart2Soul]

Sorry, I just edited it and that wasn't my intention,.. but you probably know me enough by now to know that I'm not like that purposely. :)

I know and thank you sister!

 

[April_Rose]

I know and thank you sister!

You're welcome. :)