Spiritual Israelite
Well-Known Member
So, who do you think are the mortals who would populate the earth during the thousand years then? Would they be saved or unsaved?I think they were in the first resurrection and have their new glorified bodies…
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So, who do you think are the mortals who would populate the earth during the thousand years then? Would they be saved or unsaved?I think they were in the first resurrection and have their new glorified bodies…
You did not answer one single question (as is your pattern) but ducked around the issues. Please re-address.
(19) Premil has an unhealthy obsessive focus on natural Israel, wrongly believing her to be God’s chosen people today under the new covenant. As a result, they have a mistaken fixation with natural Jerusalem in the Middle East, as if it is the epicenter of God’s workings with mankind on this earth and the place of His unconditional favor. This is wrong! They ignore much Scripture that shows that the fig tree has been cut down, the kingdom of God has been removed from Israel. Ancient Jerusalem and the temple therein were merely Old Testament imperfect shadows of the heavenly reality that was revealed at the first advent. The New Testament repeatedly teaches that we have become one with spiritual believing Israel in the OT. It makes clear; there is only one elect people. There is only one good olive tree, not two; one body, not two; one bride, not two; one spiritual temple, not two; one people of God, not two; one household of faith, not two; one fold, not two; one new man, not “twain,” and one elect of God throughout time!
(20) General unqualified phrases like “all,” “all nations,” “the quick (or living) and the dead,” “every man,” “every eye,” “every one,” “men,” “man,” “all men everywhere,” “the flesh of all men both free and bond, both small and great,” “all that dwell upon the earth … whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world ,” “they that dwell on the earth … whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world,” “the world,” “the whole world” and “all the world,” that objective and impartial Bible students acknowledge embrace the whole human race (or the full amount of all the wicked) are redefined and explained away to let Premil fit. If one was to take a precise straightforward interpretation of these phrases, one could only come to conclusion that there are no exclusions here. This shows that the Premil boast that they are literalists is inaccurate.
(21) Premil takes common linguistic terms that are easily understood by the unindoctrinated observer in any language to mean the opposite to what they actually say. For example, Premil does not believe that "first" means first and "last" means last. The English words “first” and “last” are taken from the Greek words protos and eschatos and are widely accepted by all unbiased theologians to denote exactly what they say. The word protos means first, as in the foremost in time, place, order or importance. The word eschatos on the other hand means end, last, farthest and final. It is explicitly clear from their usage, meaning and context in the New Testament that these words are the exact antithesis of each other.
(22) Premil does not believe that “the end” refers to the end. The New Testament word from which we get our phrase “the end” is the Greek word telos which refers to the point aimed at as a limit, i.e. the conclusion of an act or state. It is the termination point of a thing. When Scripture simply talks about “the beginning” without any other additional words or contextual reason to identify it with a specific event, then most sane theologians agree it is talking about “the beginning” of creation. Whilst all sound theologians agree on this many are inconsistent when it comes to “the end.” The reason I believe is because it cuts across a lot of their end-time theology they have been taught. But I believe we should treat both sayings similarly. Unless Scripture specifically identifies “the end” with a particular event or matter like “the end of barley harvest” (Ruth 2:23) “the end of the sabbath” (Matt 28:1), “the end of the year” (2 Chron 24:23), “the end of the rod” (1 Sam 14:27), or “the end of the commandment” (1 Tim 1:5), etc, etc, then we should understand it as the end of the world (which is the end of the age).
I recognize that as Isaiah 2:4, but you should specify which book and chapter you are quoting from in case someone doesn't know. Please read my post #331 where I show what time period the last days refers to, according to scripture. It does not refer to a time period after Christ returns.
When did Peter indicate that the last days began in Acts 2:16-21? When did he indicate that the last days will end in 2 Peter 3:3-4?Daniel 12:12-13 KJV
12) Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.
13) But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.
Context is king . . . as they say . . .
Much love!
You did not answer one single question (as is your pattern) but ducked around the issues. Please re-address.
Please read it (post #331) because your current understanding of the last days does not line up with what scripture teaches.I missed that post I guess. I can go look at it. But I know the last days as the tribulation and onward.
In this context,
Isaiah 2:2-4 KJV
2) And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.
3) And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
4) And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
. . . I'd answer that these last days are as these things be fulfilled. In the last days, Jesus will establish His rule over the earth from Jerusalem.
Much love!
Just make sure you are examining contexts before reaching conclusions.So, you are inventing a Mark 2 "lasts days" to facilitate Premil that are introduced after the "last day." How convenient!
Just make sure you are examining contexts before reaching conclusions.
Much love!
Please back up your claims with scripture. Our opinions mean nothing without scriptural support. Thanks.I did not read all your covenantal arguments to not believein premillenialism ( though which version of pre-mil are you against).
But there is only one reason to believe in the pre-millenial physical return of Jesus Christ to reign for 1,000 years---IT IS BIBLICAL!
So how are people dying in your future millennium? There must be mortals in it.
Vanity.
Please read it (post #331) because your current understanding of the last days does not line up with what scripture teaches.
I don’t think a lot are dying but…I would assume they die in various ways…?
Yes, I think there are mortals in the thousand years. I think it probably begins as not many, seeing as how the tribulation is so horrifying and destructive.
The comment had to do with the emptiness of your remark.More ad hominem from Premils on this thread who cannot deal with the Op. I will add it to the list of false charges:
Do you also invent 2 NHNEs as well to sustain your theory?
Is this your way of saying you are completely fine with the way that Davy talks to us? I can never tell for sure what it is you're trying to say.The 22 reasons is criticism against premill. It will just go down hill from there. Bullying is just as nonsensical as rudeness.
Vanity.
Please back up your claims with scripture. Our opinions mean nothing without scriptural support. Thanks.