At a certain point you just have to laugh.
I get that we, as humans, have to have a certain amount of…stored biases/pre-formed ideas from experience that we apply to some things. Otherwise, every time we faced something a second and third and tenth time, we would have to learn what it was again. HUGE waste of time and doubtful we would survive long.
But we absolutely can, and often do, when reading scripture, apply biases that we should not. Are we trying to save time when we read scripture? Of course not. We are trying to learn, not save time.
It really depends on how one approaches the reading of the Bible.
We all have our different approach, and I'm am far less willing to not use a word's normal meaning. When I say normal meaning, what I mean is this.
Prayerfully, I look at every place that a word, in its various forms, or term, maybe a group of words like this, "sons of God", and I look for any passage which in it's context shows a definitive meaning. I look for the commonality of the usages. I look for any exceptions. I look for ambiguous occurances.
In some cases I find that it always means the same thing every time, that the context is clear in each instance, and it's always the same. When I see this, I have confidence that this is exactly as it appears.
In some cases I find clear contexts that show various meanings, maybe two, maybe three. Peirasmsos is a good example of this, as sometimes it means to put to the test, other times it means to entice to sin. The concept is the same, to present some contrary thing or experience or idea or something. The one who is firm against sin is tested, and that testing proves their faith. The one who is tempted is considering the sin, being aroused in their lust.
I look to see the specific meaning, or range of meaning, and examine the contexts of each usage to see how it fits. I look at how different translators handle the different passages, and what the commentators and lexicons say. But primarily I take in how the Bible uses the word(s).
I take these meanings and go back through every place the word appears, and see how they fit the contexts, using the unambiguous to show the meaning of the ambiguous.
It's like death being separation, the separation of the soul from the body leaves a corpse. The separation of the spirit from God leaves a soul in a body, but without a spirit. You can take your preceptions and cultural background and say, death is when that body stops functioning, and that's partly right, but that's more the result of death (separation) than what death itself is. Limiting the meaning of death to "the body stops working" doesn't include "dead in trespasses and sin", however, separation does.
And people have very different sorts of minds. Just one example, consider the Autism Spectrum, and how that can impact how people process things. Autism can create specialization in the mind, for numbers, or language, or spatial relationships. Have you read about or seen movies about Temple Grandin? She's amazing! And she has a very different sort of mind. There are many things that can make us very different from each other. Another amazing thing is that in His Word He speaks to us all!
Much love!