True.
Prophecy is fulfilled by what it says shall come to pass.
Symbols in prophecy can be interpreted for meaning.
The specific prophecies of Ezek 40- is not with symbols, nor by symbolic names as Gog in the prophetic vision of Ezex 38.
I.e. no prophecy but symbol only.
Prophecy can have symbols, but not prophecy is symbolic only.
There is no specific measurement of the temple and priesthood and Lord's glory in His house, that can be turned into symbols.
Prophecy that is symbol only, is fable only.
If the temple of the Millennium is symbolic, so is the Millennium.
Amillennialism.
If not, then it's just another version of Christ's Millennium, made by opinions of men.
You mean by opinions of yours that you say are required, since your opinion is that the specifics of the prophecy cannot come to pass, since you say Christ's prophecy will violate Christ's gospel.
Mere opinion with no Scripture stating so.
Your opinion about NT doctrine, leads you to opinion about OT prophecy, which leads you to changing the prophecy, in order to help Jesus not to violate His doctrine by His prophecy.
You destroy prophecy of Scripture to save gospel of Christ.
I believe prophecy of Scripture, and am shown by the Holy Ghost through rightly dividing Scripture, how the prophecy does not violate the gospel.
1. The law of Moses cannot be the law of the Millennium.
2. Offerings for sin are not outlawed by the Lord, except those offered to idols.
3. Burnt offerings were a smell of sweet savour to the Lord before the law of Moses, and they will be again during His Millennium.
4. The prophecies of Zek 40- will come to pass exactly as written, even as the prophecies before Ezek 40.
And so we conclude with my teaching of Scripture, which your reject, and your opinions about Scripture, which are yours alone.
Move into the NT instead of getting besotted with the old abolished arrangement. Consider the cross. It will change your life and theology forever. When Jesus cried it is finished, the old covenant sacrifice system was finished. This was reinforced by the ripping of the temple curtain in two. Christ was the final sacrifice for sin.
Hebrews 7:27 says of Christ and His final atonement, “Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.”
Hebrews 9:28 explains that "Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many.”
Hebrews 10:10 says, “we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.”
Hebrews 10:12 says, “this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God.”
Hebrews 10:14 says, “For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.”
There it is! Clear and irrefutable! This is the sacrifice to end all sacrifices forever!!! "Forever" actually means "forever."
Romans 6:10 says, “he died unto sin once.”
1 Peter 3:18 says, “For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit.”
Hebrews 9:12 explains, “by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.”
Christ put an end of sin by this final transaction for sin, thus making an end of sin forever for those who would believe. There will never again be a sacrifice for sin. Christ’s atonement satisfied heaven’s holy demands and ensured that there would never again be another sacrifice/offering for sin carrying God’s blessing.