We agree on the KJB being the pure Word, but Ellen G. White is a false prophetess and you cannot add her writings to the Bible. That would destroy the idea of following what the Bible teaches. The Bible warns not to add any words to the prophecy of this book (i.e. speaking ahead prophetically of the Bible itself). This is the case because Isaiah 34:16 is clearly speaking to those in the End Times and telling people to seek ye out the Book of the Lord and read. It’s not telling you to seek out a Bible AND Ellen G White’s prophecies. But this thread is not about her but it is about the Bible.
I thank you for your comments, sentiments, and appreciate the words to not stray from the original topic.
If you would, I would be glad to speak with you about what the Bible (KJB) says about prophets, testimony, in the last days, as well as historically in another thread, if which you will start, I would be glad to join and share with you, and we can discuss what you think we need to, as I am not opposed to openly, publically, engaging in such a wonderful subject. I would be delighted to have you begin such a thread, as I think we can cover some great ground there, you and I. Let me know if you are amenable to that, and if so, please link me to the new thread. I would only ask that in as much as it is possible to/for you, that you begin the thread with as little bias as possible, though I understand the strong emotional, and theological position from which you are coming from. I will not hold it against you brother 'BH' (I hope you do not mind me shortening that, but if so, let me know, and I will write the whole name each time).
I will leave you with:
Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
Just like Inspiration and Preservation, God gave both
[1] Law (written word)
[2] Testimony (spoken word, which was always subject to the written word).
The Sadducees, fell into the same ditch, in that they rejected all the prophets that came after Moses, and only held to the teachings as they seemed to find in the Torah, which is why Jesus had to prove to them, from Moses (Torah) the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead:
Mat_22:32 I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.
Mar_12:26 And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?
Luk_13:28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.
Luk_20:37 Now that the dead are raised, even Moses shewed at the bush, when he calleth the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.
If we go with the same ideology as the Sadducees, then why as Christians do we accept the writings of the Nevi'im (prophets), who all came after what Moses specifically wrote, and had, dreams, visions, and additional instruction by those prophets / messengers, like Samuel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, and all the rest, even into the NT, like John the Baptist? Jesus Himself was "that prophet", and was one of the major reasons that the vast majority of the Sadducees rejected Him, as He was not the written Torah, but came nearly 1500 years after Moses. To the Sadducess, Jesus (and the other prophets) was / were extraneous, and not to be trusted. It's why Jesus proved to them from the Torah, that Moses wrote of Him (Jesus). This may be done for sister White also, as needful, but not in this thread.
If we only were to accept what was written, we could only accept the Ten Commandments, as they were specifically written by God. We know they are God's words. Why would we accept the material which came after by Moses (a prophet / messenger)?
We could then say the same of Moses' writings, and that which came after by Joshua or Samuel.
We could then say the same of all that, and that which came after by David (Acts 2:30) and Solomon.
We could then say the same of all that, and that which came after by Isaiah.
... then by Jeremiah.
... then by Ezekiel.
... then by Daniel.
... then by each of the other prophets / messengers (Hosea - Malachi).
... then by Simeon (in the temple) (Luke 2:25,34).
... then by Anna (in the Temple) (Luke 2:36-38).
... then by John the Baptist (Mark 11:32; Luke 7:28, 20:6).
... then by Jesus (Luke 13:33; John 4:44, 6:14).
... then by Agabus (Acts 11:28, 21:10).
... then by Philips four daughters (Acts 21:9).
... then by the others like as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen (Acts 13:1).
... then by others after which can be pointed out as needful.
As requested, I will not derail this thread unto that subject (E. G. White, and prophets), as I appreciate the topic in itself. I just hope that this one response may give you something to consider if you desire to begin the new thread. Thank you so much for this opportunity to share with you and others.