Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Doug, what does this mean?You said there is 2 gospels for Gentiles and 1 for Jews
There was Peter's gospel where both Jew and Gentile were saved
There is Paul's gospel by which Jew and Gentiles are saved
So, would you say that this would be one of the points on which you differ with Doug?He was never `in.` He was told by the Lord that he and the other 11 apostles would rule over the 12 tribes of Israel.
Quote the verse please.Yes, but we mustn't forget also the scripture that says the apostles and prophets are the foundation with Jesus being the chief cornerstone of it
Love your honesty here.I've heard some say in the Greek petros was a little rock, whereas petra implied a big boulder, but I don't know whether that is true or not.
Please quote Paul. ThanksPaul did make a reference to "the chiefest of apostles", so some were more prominent than others I think it is safe to say
If Peter was never in the Church, why does he think that Jesus's rules about the Church apply to him, so that he asks about how many times he should forgive his brother, and why does Jesus give him the rules for behavior in the Church?He was never `in.` He was told by the Lord that he and the other 11 apostles would rule over the 12 tribes of Israel.
I quoted it a little while back, but you probably aren't following every post on this thread....I know I'm not. Here it is again:Quote the verse please.
2Co 11:5Please quote Paul. Thanks
Think you must have missed an earlier post of mine where I implied much the same thing. Nevertheless, why on earth wouldn't I be honest....?Love your honesty here.
Romans 7, note 4, we are married to Christ, so we are the bride of Christ.^ The title of your thread "THE CHURCH IS NOT THE BRIDE OF CHRIST"
is from the Pit. Learn the truth and repent > Evangelicals, Awaken: The Old Covenant Is Gone and You Are Under a Spell
Earlier Paul said, 1Corinthians 3:11,Eph 2:19-20
Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
You must know the context.2Co 11:5
For I suppose I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles
Precious friend, what meaneth this part?Jesus Christ being the Chief Cornerstone
Precious brother, likewise appreciate your pursuit of God's Truth, Rightly Dividing AllEspousal Means Future Union
Are you asking because you are ignorant(doubtful).Precious friend, what meaneth this part?
Next time don't sugarcoat it.These people don't rightly divide the word, they butcher it into Satanic dispensations and absolute blasphemy. They carve the Gospel of Jesus Christ into the breath of the Dragon.
They mutilate the covenant of Christ, amputate the Body of believers, and dress up their heresy in wedding metaphors they don't even understand. They’ve replaced the blood-sealed unity of the Church with a schizophrenic theology that splits the Bride from the Body, the Cross from the Kingdom, and Jesus from His own Gospel.
This isn’t exegesis, this is sorcery with footnotes.
They’ve hijacked the mystery Paul revealed—Christ in you, the hope of glory—and turned it into a fantasy romance for a nation that crucified the Messiah and still rejects Him and spits on the Cross to this day. They don’t want union with Christ, they want a sequel with different actors.
A second covenant.
A second Bride,
and a second chance for unbelief.
There is no backup bride.
No postponed wedding.
No second covenant for ethnic flesh.
No throne in Jerusalem with sinners waving a flag that bears the cursed, demonic Star of Rephan.
You are not “rightly dividing” when you carve Christ in pieces.
You are not “defending the Word” when you twist it into an eschatological fairy tale that rewrites Calvary.
What they're doing is open blasphemy.
The Gospel is not a Jewish romance novel, it is a bloody, cosmic war for the soul of man—won once and for all by the crucified and risen King. And the Church is not waiting at the altar. The Church is His Body—flesh of His flesh, bone of His bone, sealed with the Spirit and seated with Him in the heavenlies right now.
You want to see the Bride?
Look in the mirror—if Christ is in you.
If not, then stop preaching False Israel.
And start fearing God.
To avoid the gates of Hell and the wrath of Almighty God, read the truth and come out from under the Dragon’s veil. > Evangelicals, Awaken: The Old Covenant Is Gone and You Are Under a Spell
I don't know if you've picked up on it, but some people are beyond being reasoned with.Are you asking because you are ignorant(doubtful).
Or because you want me to prove I am learned in the scriptures?
Ancient buildings used a large stone positioned in the corner of the building. This was the first step in building a new structure.
This large stone was used as a guide to organize where the rest of the stones were to be placed.
Sometime in my preteen years I think I learned this during a sermon at worship. But I don't have a good memory so.
Of course this is all figurative symbolism.
Jesus is also the door of His spiritual house.
Correct me if I'm wrong but ekklesia is feminineBrother, I appreciate your pursuit of truth, but this teaching that “the Church is not the Bride” is a misstep in rightly dividing the Word. It may sound doctrinally clean on paper, but it collapses under the full weight of Scripture.
1. Espousal Means Future Union
2 Corinthians 11:2 isn’t just poetic language. Paul says he has espoused us to one husband—Christ—not to illustrate a vague concept, but to declare a covenant relationship in progress:
> “I have espoused you… that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.”
—2 Cor. 11:2
He doesn’t say “like a virgin,” or “as if.” He says to present you. That’s not symbolism—it’s purpose. Espousal is the Hebrew concept of legal betrothal. It was binding. It demanded purity. And it pointed toward an actual marriage.
2. Ephesians 5 Seals the Identity
> “This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the Church.”
—Ephesians 5:32
That mystery isn’t about human marriage—it’s about the divine one. Paul isn't using marriage as just a metaphor—he is revealing that marriage is the metaphor for Christ’s relationship with His Body, the Church.
Christ is the Bridegroom. The Church is the Bride.
The whole chapter builds this case:
Husbands = Christ
Wives = The Church
Union = Spiritual covenant
To deny the Church is the Bride is to deny the very mystery Paul calls “great.”
3. Revelation Doesn’t Contradict Paul—It Confirms Him
You quoted Revelation 21 where the New Jerusalem is called “the Bride.” But here’s the key: cities don’t get married—people do.
> “Come, I will show you the Bride, the wife of the Lamb… and he showed me the holy city, new Jerusalem…”
—Rev. 21:9–10
This is not saying that geography is being wed to Jesus. The city represents the redeemed people of God. It’s called “the Bride” because it houses the Bride. The imagery is covenantal and prophetic. Revelation is not a contradiction of Paul’s letters—it’s the consummation of them.
We’re not dealing with two separate brides. There is one Bride, one Lamb, one eternal covenant.
4. Revelation 19 Makes It Plain
> “Let us be glad… for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and His Bride has made herself ready. Fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints.”
—Rev. 19:7–8
This is before the New Jerusalem descends. The Bride here is not a city—it’s the saints. The redeemed. The Church. The linen isn’t stone walls or gold foundations—it’s righteousness. You can't pin this on physical Israel or a symbolic city. It is the Body of Christ adorned for her Groom.
5. Old Testament Imagery Isn’t the Whole Picture
Yes, the Old Testament describes God’s relationship with Israel in marital terms. He calls Himself Israel’s husband in Isaiah and Hosea. That was under the Old Covenant. But in the New, we see the mystery revealed—Jew and Gentile in one Body, the Church, joined to Christ.
> “This mystery is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body…”
—Ephesians 3:6
To claim Israel is the only Bride is to overlook the entire unveiling of the New Covenant and the mystery hidden for ages: Christ in you, the hope of glory (Col. 1:27).
6. The Bride Comes from Christ’s Side
Just like the first bride came from Adam’s side, the true Bride of Christ came from the wounded side of the Second Adam—when His blood was poured out to redeem a people for Himself.
Jesus didn’t just die for Israel. He died for the Church He would call out, purify, and unite to Himself forever.
> “Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave Himself for it… that He might present it to Himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle…”
—Ephesians 5:25–27
That is Bride language. That is covenant language. That is gospel language.
---
Final Word: Don’t Divide What God Has Joined
The idea that the Church is not the Bride is a reaction against bad theology—but it's an overcorrection. It separates what the Word joins together. It diminishes the intimacy Christ offers His Body. And it weakens the power of the Gospel, which isn’t just about salvation—it’s about union.
There is no second-class bride. There is no backup wedding.
There is one Lamb.
One cross.
One covenant.
One Spirit.
One Body.
One Bride.
And she is being made ready—washed in blood, clothed in righteousness, and longing for her King.
> “And the Spirit and the Bride say, Come.”
—Revelation 22:17
Are you laughing at me or with me?Next time don't sugarcoat it.
I thought you were being sarcastic (in a good way) so I laughed at your joke.Are you laughing at me or with me?