In Defense of OSAS – Why "Once Saved, Always Saved" Is the Heart of the Gospel

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
22,505
3,785
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The doctrine of Once Saved, Always Saved (OSAS) is one of the most misunderstood and misrepresented teachings in the Christian faith. Critics often claim that it encourages sin, ignores repentance, or contradicts church tradition. Some even call it "Gnostic" or "cheap grace."

But OSAS is not a modern invention, nor is it a license to sin. It is a profound expression of the depth of God’s grace, the security of Christ’s finished work, and the freedom of the believer in the New Covenant.

Let’s take a closer look.


---

1. The Biblical Foundation for Eternal Security

The clearest testimony comes from Christ Himself:

> “I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.”
— John 10:28



Notice the words: eternal, never, no one. Not even you can snatch yourself from His hand. That’s security, not presumption.

> “Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes Him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.”
— John 5:24



He has eternal life. Not "might have." Not "as long as he behaves." The transfer from death to life is permanent.

> “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God—not a result of works, so that no one may boast.”
— Ephesians 2:8–9



If salvation is not from works, how could it be lost by works?


---

2. Is Grace Conditional? Then It’s Not Grace.

If our salvation depends on maintaining obedience, then the Gospel becomes a contract, not a gift.
You’d be back under law: perform or perish.

That’s not Good News.

The Apostle Paul was clear:

> “Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?”
— Galatians 3:3

You didn’t earn it. You can’t keep it by effort. The same God who saved you is the one who keeps you.

--

3. But What About Apostasy?

What about those who “fall away”? Scripture gives two answers:

1. They were never truly born again



> “They went out from us, but they were not of us…” (1 John 2:19)
Outward faith can mimic real regeneration. Only God sees the heart.



2. God disciplines His children, not disowns them



> “The Lord disciplines those he loves…” (Hebrews 12:6)
Falling into sin invites correction, not rejection.




---

4. OSAS Is Not an Excuse to Sin

True believers don’t want to abuse grace. Why?

> “No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God’s seed abides in him.”
— 1 John 3:9



A new heart means new desires.
A Christian may stumble, but he no longer walks in the same direction.


---

5. Historical and Theological Witnesses

Luther: Salvation by grace alone, through faith alone.

Calvin: The elect will persevere because God preserves them.

The Catholic Church, even with its emphasis on mortal sin, still teaches that God’s mercy is greater than human failure.


The early Church saw salvation as a secure covenant, not a fragile agreement.


---

6. Without OSAS, God Becomes a Tyrant

Let’s be honest: If God saves you, but lets go of you the moment you mess up, that’s not a loving Father—that’s a judge with a short fuse.

If salvation can be lost, we live in fear, not faith.

> “There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear…”
— 1 John 4:18



OSAS doesn’t make God weak. It shows He is strong enough to carry us, even when we fall.


---

7. The Cross Is Enough

Jesus doesn’t need to die again every time you sin. He died once for all.

> “For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.”
— Hebrews 10:14



Your justification is not in progress. It is finished.


---

Conclusion

Without OSAS, the Gospel becomes fear-based religion.
With OSAS, it becomes what it was always meant to be: Good News.

God is not calling you to walk a tightrope. He is calling you to trust in a finished work.

Once saved, always saved – not because we hold on to God, but because He holds on to us.

> “If we are faithless, He remains faithful – for He cannot deny Himself.”
— 2 Timothy 2:13
It's NOT a teaching of the historic Chroistian faith.
And, yes - it IS a modern invention of the 16th century.

OSAS is not Scripturally-teneble. It can ONLY be "sopported" by verses take OUT of their proper context.
It is NOT taugh toin the CONTEXT of Scripture. It is as unbiblical as Sola Scriptura . . .
 

BeforeThereWas

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
441
165
43
OK City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
It's NOT a teaching of the historic Chroistian faith.
And, yes - it IS a modern invention of the 16th century.

OSAS is not Scripturally-teneble. It can ONLY be "sopported" by verses take OUT of their proper context.
It is NOT taugh toin the CONTEXT of Scripture. It is as unbiblical as Sola Scriptura . . .

Wow. If what you're saying were true, Paul was not only a liar but he was WAY out of synch with your timeline since he taught OSAS very plainly and succinctly.

Guess I'll go with Paul.

BTW
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan

BeforeThereWas

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
441
165
43
OK City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Just the other day I received a moronic comment from an ignorant individual accusing Paul as the originator of what he wrote about Holy Spirit having been given as an earnest for our salvation. The person simply would not accept the impossibility for our salvation to be removed from us on account of that being a matter of the Father forfeiting His own Spirit. They would not accept the Holy Spirit inspired wording by using financial terminology as the comparative.

Some people simply refuse to accept what scripture teaches us by reading it for what it says. The practice of eisegesis is alive and well.

BTW
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eternally Grateful

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
22,505
3,785
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Wow. If what you're saying were true, Paul was not only a liar but he was WAY out of synch with your timeline since he taught OSAS very plainly and succinctly.

Guess I'll go with Paul.

BTW
I, too will go with Paul. But I'll read his words in their proper context.
You see – he ALSO taught that salvation could be LOST by our own doing . . .
Rom. 11:22
“See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise you to will be cut off.”

Paul
is warning the faithful to REMAIN in God’s favor or they will lose their salvation. How can they lose what they never had?

Like the rest of Scripture – when read in its proper contextPaul also taught that salvation is a PROCESS, and NOT a one-time, slam-dunk event:
Rom. 13:11
And do this, understanding the present time: The hour has already come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.

If you're already "saved" when you first come to faith in Christ - how can you be "nearer to salvation" later on?

Salvation is a gift that God will NOT take away from us. However – WE can walk away from that gift at ANY point in our life. God does not force His love on us. It is freely given for us to freely accept or reject it.

You have to cherry-pick the Scriptures out of context in order to arrive at the false doctrine of
OSAS . . .
 

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2020
19,704
10,428
113
60
Columbus, ohio
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I, too will go with Paul. But I'll read his words in their proper context.
You see – he ALSO taught that salvation could be LOST by our own doing . . .
Rom. 11:22
“See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise you to will be cut off.”

Paul
is warning the faithful to REMAIN in God’s favor or they will lose their salvation. How can they lose what they never had?

Like the rest of Scripture – when read in its proper contextPaul also taught that salvation is a PROCESS, and NOT a one-time, slam-dunk event:
Rom. 13:11
And do this, understanding the present time: The hour has already come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.

If you're already "saved" when you first come to faith in Christ - how can you be "nearer to salvation" later on?

Salvation is a gift that God will NOT take away from us. However – WE can walk away from that gift at ANY point in our life. God does not force His love on us. It is freely given for us to freely accept or reject it.

You have to cherry-pick the Scriptures out of context in order to arrive at the false doctrine of
OSAS . . .
paul is speaking to GENTILES here. not induviduls

talk about cherry pic
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
22,505
3,785
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
paul is speaking to GENTILES here. not induviduls

talk about cherry pic
What does that mean??

Paul is writing TRUTH – and that truth is that you can LOSE your security by your OWN doing.
The Bible is FILLED with such warnings
(Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46, John 15:1-6, Rom. 11:22, 1 Cor. 4:4, 1 Cor. 9:27, 1 Cor. 10:12, 1 Tim. 4:1, 1 Tim. 4:16, 2 Tim. 2:12, Heb. 3:6, Heb. 3:12-14, Heb. 6:4-6, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Pet. 2:20-21, 2 Pet. 3:17, 1 John 2:24, 1 John 5:13, Rev. 3:5, Rev. 22:19)
 

BeforeThereWas

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
441
165
43
OK City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I, too will go with Paul. But I'll read his words in their proper context.
You see – he ALSO taught that salvation could be LOST by our own doing . . .
Rom. 11:22
“See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise you to will be cut off.”

Paul
is warning the faithful to REMAIN in God’s favor or they will lose their salvation. How can they lose what they never had?

Like the rest of Scripture – when read in its proper contextPaul also taught that salvation is a PROCESS, and NOT a one-time, slam-dunk event:
Rom. 13:11
And do this, understanding the present time: The hour has already come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.

If you're already "saved" when you first come to faith in Christ - how can you be "nearer to salvation" later on?

Salvation is a gift that God will NOT take away from us. However – WE can walk away from that gift at ANY point in our life. God does not force His love on us. It is freely given for us to freely accept or reject it.

You have to cherry-pick the Scriptures out of context in order to arrive at the false doctrine of
OSAS . . .

What's concerning is that you are assuming salvation into that verse. Severity is not defined as loss of salvation. If it were, then Holy Spirit left that to mere subjectivity. Israel was cut off, but are still saved today those who embrace Christ. I am Israeli and saved, even though we are cut off as a nation. Translating that into loss of salvation is therefore problematic.

BTW
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
22,505
3,785
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
What's concerning is that you are assuming salvation into that verse. Severity is not defined as loss of salvation. If it were, then Holy Spirit left that to mere subjectivity. Israel was cut off, but are still saved today those who embrace Christ. I am Israeli and saved, even though we are cut off as a nation. Translating that into loss of salvation is therefore problematic.

BTW
Then you disagree with Paul.
He, indeed was saying that “severity” was a loss of salvation.

Kindness is reserved for those who remain faithful.
Severity is assigned to those who are cut off.
Rom. 11:22

“See, then, the kindness and severity of God: SEVERITY toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise you too will be CUT OFF.”

 

BeforeThereWas

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
441
165
43
OK City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Then you disagree with Paul.
He, indeed was saying that “severity” was a loss of salvation.

Kindness is reserved for those who remain faithful.
Severity is assigned to those who are cut off.
Rom. 11:22

“See, then, the kindness and severity of God: SEVERITY toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise you too will be CUT OFF.”


No. I disagree with your interpretation. One doesn't have to interpret anything to realize that when the Lord inspired Paul to write that true believers have the "earnest" of Holy Spirit, and for the Lord to withdraw salvation from anyone would be a matter of His forfeiting His own Spirit:

2 Corinthians 1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts. (earnest - Greek arrabōn, G728, an earnest, i. e. money which in purchases is given as a pledge that the full amount will subsequently be paid.)

Also:

2 Corinthians 5:5 Now he that hath wrought us for the selfsame thing is God, who also hath given unto us the earnest of the Spirit.

The other places one may see "earnest" where it apples to a vigorous pursuit of some thing or some one, the Greek words are not G728, just in case some armchair expert out there who is not a scholar of the Greek language at or greater than the translators decides to try and brow-beat this revelation into oblivion, don't waste your time. Even in the ancient culture of Israel, an earnest was just as it is today, and the one giving the earnest withdrawing his commitment renders his earnest relinquished to the receiver of the earnest, and the Lord is not EVER going to forfeit His own Spirit.

So, no, I don't disagree with Paul because that would be disagreeing with the Lord who inspired Paul to write what you grossly misinterpreted into something of your own making. Severity of the Lord and being cut off are not matters of salvation withdrawn, for the context doesn't focus upon your contrived phenomenon known as "loss of salvation." You completely ignored OTHER of what Paul said about that self-same topic in the very same context:


Romans 11:23-24
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?

The broader context shows the warped and twisted interpretation you applied to this topic, which leads only to strange doctrines of demons the idea of being saved, then unsaved, then saved again, then unsaved...in perpetuity. Where do you people get this stuff, other than pulling it from some unmentionable part of your anatomy? Eisegesis is wrong. We should all be practicing exegesis. To say that one loses his salvation when they sin after salvation, who among you stopped sinning after being saved? None of you stopped sinning, but some have the audacity to look at others who may be doing greater sins than you and assume upon them loss of salvation? Show to us that imaginary line whereby the crossing of which leads to an alleged loss of salvation! Let's see it. If you're so wise in your conceits to think that your beliefs trump these quotes directly from the word of God, then show to us something with substance.

BTW
 

BeforeThereWas

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
441
165
43
OK City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Joshua Harris, who wrote "I Kissed Dating Goodbye," and also declared his unbelief in God, some here will say he lost his salvation...never able to prove it, but many will sit as his Judge in relation to his salvation, and some would dare not try shoving Christ aside off His Throne to make that declaration.

Meanwhile, some think themselves authorities over the topic of salvation lost...as if that even existed.

A man could murder millions of people in his past, come to a saving knowledge and faith in Christ, be saved and forgiven of all those millions of murders, and then steal a candy bar from a store while hungry, after having been saved, and declared as having allegedly "lost his salvation," by the self-made authorities out there who seem to see themselves as those who can declare such a loss AND who themselves are still sinning on a daily basis till the day they die.

Folks, do you see the problem here?

BTW
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
22,505
3,785
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
No. I disagree with your interpretation. One doesn't have to interpret anything to realize that when the Lord inspired Paul to write that true believers have the "earnest" of Holy Spirit, and for the Lord to withdraw salvation from anyone would be a matter of His forfeiting His own Spirit:

2 Corinthians 1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts. (earnest - Greek arrabōn, G728, an earnest, i. e. money which in purchases is given as a pledge that the full amount will subsequently be paid.)

Also:

2 Corinthians 5:5 Now he that hath wrought us for the selfsame thing is God, who also hath given unto us the earnest of the Spirit.

The other places one may see "earnest" where it apples to a vigorous pursuit of some thing or some one, the Greek words are not G728, just in case some armchair expert out there who is not a scholar of the Greek language at or greater than the translators decides to try and brow-beat this revelation into oblivion, don't waste your time. Even in the ancient culture of Israel, an earnest was just as it is today, and the one giving the earnest withdrawing his commitment renders his earnest relinquished to the receiver of the earnest, and the Lord is not EVER going to forfeit His own Spirit.

So, no, I don't disagree with Paul because that would be disagreeing with the Lord who inspired Paul to write what you grossly misinterpreted into something of your own making. Severity of the Lord and being cut off are not matters of salvation withdrawn, for the context doesn't focus upon your contrived phenomenon known as "loss of salvation." You completely ignored OTHER of what Paul said about that self-same topic in the very same context:


Romans 11:23-24
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?

The broader context shows the warped and twisted interpretation you applied to this topic, which leads only to strange doctrines of demons the idea of being saved, then unsaved, then saved again, then unsaved...in perpetuity. Where do you people get this stuff, other than pulling it from some unmentionable part of your anatomy? Eisegesis is wrong. We should all be practicing exegesis. To say that one loses his salvation when they sin after salvation, who among you stopped sinning after being saved? None of you stopped sinning, but some have the audacity to look at others who may be doing greater sins than you and assume upon them loss of salvation? Show to us that imaginary line whereby the crossing of which leads to an alleged loss of salvation! Let's see it. If you're so wise in your conceits to think that your beliefs trump these quotes directly from the word of God, then show to us something with substance.

BTW
Judging by the vitriol of your response – I must have really hit a nerve . . .
No – Pau was clear that if you do NOT remain in God’s favor – you will be CUT OFF.

The Greek word used here, ek-kop'-to means:
1) to cut out, cut off 1a) of a tree
It doesn’t mean “a lesser reward” as YOU would have us believe.

I know this may be painful for you to realize – but this these is warned about over and over in Scripture:
Hebrews 10:26-27

“If we sin deliberately AFTER receiving KNOWLEDGE of the truth, there no longer remains sacrifice for sins but a fearful prospect of judgment and a flaming fire that is going to consume the adversaries.”
This is a clear warning that falling away from God will result in the loss of our salvation. The Greek ford for “knowledge” used here is NOT the usual word (oida). This is talking about a full, experiential knowledge (epignosei). This verse is about CHRISTIANS who had an EPIGNOSIS of Christ and who can fall back into darkness and LOSE their salvation by their own doing.

2 Peter 2:20-22

For if they, having escaped the defilements of the world through the KNOWLEDGE of our Lord and savior Jesus Christ, again become entangled and overcome by them, their last condition is worse than their first.
For it would have been better for them not to have KNOWN the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment handed down to them.

Here, Peter illustrates that those who had a full, experiential knowledge (epignosei) of Christ – CHRISTIANS – who can fall back into darkness and LOSE their salvation by their own doing.

Matt. 5:13

You are the salt of the earth. But if salt loses its taste, with what can it be seasoned? It is no longer good for anything but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot.
This one is self-explanatory - even to a blind person . . .

1 Cor. 9:27

"I pummel my body and subdue it, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified."
Paul is saying that he wrestles with his own fleshly desires so that he might not fall back into sin.

2 Peter 3:17

Therefore, dear friends, since you already know this, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of lawless men and fall from your secure position.

Peter is warning the faithful not to fall back into sin and lawlessness.

1 John 2:24

See that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. IF it does, you also will REMAIN in the Son and in the Father.
This is an admonition to try to remain faithful.

Rev. 3:5

He who overcomes will, like them, be dressed in white. I will never blot out his name from the book of life, but will acknowledge his name before my Father and his angels.

God cannot blot out a name that was never there in the first place. He is talking about CHRISTIANS who are already saved and how they can LOSE their salvation.

Rev. 22:19

And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.

How can God “take away” somebody’s “share” of heaven if they never had it to begin with? This is about CHRISTIANS who may or may NOT make it into Heaven.

It’s NOT about God going back on HIS promise.

It’s about US falling back into darkness and rejecting HIM . . .
 

BeforeThereWas

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
441
165
43
OK City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Judging by the vitriol of your response – I must have really hit a nerve . . .
No – Pau was clear that if you do NOT remain in God’s favor – you will be CUT OFF.

The Greek word used here, ek-kop'-to means:
1) to cut out, cut off 1a) of a tree
It doesn’t mean “a lesser reward” as YOU would have us believe.

I know this may be painful for you to realize – but this these is warned about over and over in Scripture:
Hebrews 10:26-27

“If we sin deliberately AFTER receiving KNOWLEDGE of the truth, there no longer remains sacrifice for sins but a fearful prospect of judgment and a flaming fire that is going to consume the adversaries.”
This is a clear warning that falling away from God will result in the loss of our salvation. The Greek ford for “knowledge” used here is NOT the usual word (oida). This is talking about a full, experiential knowledge (epignosei). This verse is about CHRISTIANS who had an EPIGNOSIS of Christ and who can fall back into darkness and LOSE their salvation by their own doing.

2 Peter 2:20-22

For if they, having escaped the defilements of the world through the KNOWLEDGE of our Lord and savior Jesus Christ, again become entangled and overcome by them, their last condition is worse than their first.
For it would have been better for them not to have KNOWN the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment handed down to them.

Here, Peter illustrates that those who had a full, experiential knowledge (epignosei) of Christ – CHRISTIANS – who can fall back into darkness and LOSE their salvation by their own doing.

Matt. 5:13
You are the salt of the earth. But if salt loses its taste, with what can it be seasoned? It is no longer good for anything but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot.
This one is self-explanatory - even to a blind person . . .

1 Cor. 9:27
"I pummel my body and subdue it, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified."
Paul is saying that he wrestles with his own fleshly desires so that he might not fall back into sin.

2 Peter 3:17

Therefore, dear friends, since you already know this, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of lawless men and fall from your secure position.
Peter is warning the faithful not to fall back into sin and lawlessness.

1 John 2:24

See that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. IF it does, you also will REMAIN in the Son and in the Father.
This is an admonition to try to remain faithful.

Rev. 3:5

He who overcomes will, like them, be dressed in white. I will never blot out his name from the book of life, but will acknowledge his name before my Father and his angels.
God cannot blot out a name that was never there in the first place. He is talking about CHRISTIANS who are already saved and how they can LOSE their salvation.

Rev. 22:19

And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.
How can God “take away” somebody’s “share” of heaven if they never had it to begin with? This is about CHRISTIANS who may or may NOT make it into Heaven.

It’s NOT about God going back on HIS promise.

It’s about US falling back into darkness and rejecting HIM . . .

I can understand you calling it vitriol when it hits upon criticism against your pet doctrine. You should study what being cut off really means rather than to subjectively apply salvation as a defining feature to being cut off. When Paul spoke of Israel, the natural branche being cut off, he did not at all include salvation as the defining feature. You, by your own authority, which is none at all, forced that into the context where it is not at all applicable.

BTW
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eternally Grateful

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2020
19,704
10,428
113
60
Columbus, ohio
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I can understand you calling it vitriol when it hits upon criticism against your pet doctrine. You should study what being cut off really means rather than to subjectively apply salvation as a defining feature to being cut off. When Paul spoke of Israel, the natural branche being cut off, he did not at all include salvation as the defining feature. You, by your own authority, which is none at all, forced that into the context where it is not at all applicable.

BTW
he is following his church, which he thinks is infalible.

He mocks you because he thinks you privately interpret.. You should follow him
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeforeThereWas

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2020
19,704
10,428
113
60
Columbus, ohio
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
What does that mean??

Paul is writing TRUTH – and that truth is that you can LOSE your security by your OWN doing.
The Bible is FILLED with such warnings
(Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46, John 15:1-6, Rom. 11:22, 1 Cor. 4:4, 1 Cor. 9:27, 1 Cor. 10:12, 1 Tim. 4:1, 1 Tim. 4:16, 2 Tim. 2:12, Heb. 3:6, Heb. 3:12-14, Heb. 6:4-6, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Pet. 2:20-21, 2 Pet. 3:17, 1 John 2:24, 1 John 5:13, Rev. 3:5, Rev. 22:19)
no

Gentiles were grafted in but they (as a group) are unnatural branches.

Israel (the natural branch) was cut off (although there remains a remnant)

Paul told the gentile church not to boast.. why do people want to boast?
 

BeforeThereWas

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
441
165
43
OK City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Hypothetical: A saved man just committed a sin. He is on his way home to pray about it and repent but his car is t-boned in the driver door and he is dead.

Upon appearing before the Lord, he is told, "Oh, my. You didn't repent of that last sin. Too bad. You are gone!"

Do you all not see the problem here? Nobody can define the threshold for the alleged loss of salvation without running aground of subjective definition, meaning that you people live in fear all the time, not knowing if you have made the cut. If you're not living in fear within that belief system, that makes you a nihilistic fatalist. That is not to what we are called as followers of Christ.

BTW
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eternally Grateful

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
22,505
3,785
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I can understand you calling it vitriol when it hits upon criticism against your pet doctrine. You should study what being cut off really means rather than to subjectively apply salvation as a defining feature to being cut off. When Paul spoke of Israel, the natural branche being cut off, he did not at all include salvation as the defining feature. You, by your own authority, which is none at all, forced that into the context where it is not at all applicable.

BTW
NOT sure why you assume that this is MY interpretation or based on MY authority.
This is the interpretation of the Church for the last 2000 years.

The Early Church Fathers all taught that salvation was something that could be lost by one’s own doing - including those taught by the Apostles themselves., When it comes to matters of interpretation, I submit to the Authority of Christ’s Church and NOT to my own, as commanded by the Scriptures
(Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15).
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
22,505
3,785
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
no

Gentiles were grafted in but they (as a group) are unnatural branches.
Israel (the natural branch) was cut off (although there remains a remnant)
Paul told the gentile church not to boast.. why do people want to boast?
WHO is boasting?

I was merely stating the FACT that the Scriptures warn us that we can fall away and be cut-off by our OWN doing.