No need to. In 2 Thes Paul is not specific about which traditions he is talking about
Why not reply to scriptures concerning the tradition as they speak there, rather than simply pulling out my mention that the tradition Paul was speaking about had nothing to do with "the ringing of bells" there?
Traditions again, this way,
2Thes 2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast,
and hold the traditions
which ye have been taught,
whether by word,
or our epistle. (See 2 Thes 3:10 below) concerning what was taught them in word (when they were with them).
Tradition here
2 Thes 3:6
Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother
that walketh disorderly, and
not after the tradition which
he received of us.
"
WALK disorderly" NOT AFTER (( the tradition ))
RECEIVED OF US already (Again 2Thes 3:10)
He is telling them how they ought follow them after the manner of their BEHAVIOR (Paul having set himself out as a specific example for them to follow when they were actually with them). And this they taught them by mouth or in WORD (See 2Thes 3:10 again)
As he goes on to say
2 Thes 3:7 For yourselves KNOW
how ye ought to follow us: for
WE BEHAVED NOT ourselves
DISORDERLY among you
They were witnesses of their behavior and so know how to behave.
But there SOME, which "
WALKETH disorderly" NOT AFTER the tradition
RECEIVED OF US
This is speaking of THEIR WALKS, whether "WALKING orderly" (as Paul did) when he was among them as a living an example for them. As Paul says, "You yourselves know" or, because "When we were with you" (which he is NOT now) but rather is NOW writing to them exactly what they commanded them IN PERSON (which is by WORD, or by MOUTH) to "walk orderly"
Another example of
by word (mouth) and
by letter/and or epistle are shown to us in Acts 15:27 which would be a safegard for them. So after sending letters, they say, "
We have sent therefore Judas and Silas,
who shall also tell you
the same things by mouth."
So again, if this is not clear enough by now, this tradition has to do with ones behavior, which was demonstrated for them in person, which is that which is after the tradition they received of them (both by word/commanded of them but also exemplified by them in person)
2 Thes 3:10 For even
WHEN WE WERE with you, ((( this ))) we
commanded you, ((( that )))
if any would not work, neither should he eat.
So there it is, Paul is now writing in this very epistle what they actually commanded them in word (when he was actually with them). And he is doing this because they are no longer with them and are HEARING THINGS (being away) about some among them now, who are not walking after the tradition they had previously received of them.
As Paul points out here
2 Thes 3:11 For "
WE HEAR" (being away from them now) that there are some which "
WALK among you"
DISORDERLY, "
WORKING NOT AT ALL", but "
are busybodies".
These are they who "WALK disorderly" and "NOT after the tradition" they received of them when they were with them
2 Thes 3:12 Now them
that are such we
command (again, See 2Thes 3:10)
and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that "with quietness
THEY WORK, and EAT THEIR OWN BREAD."
And so Paul ends with
2 Thes 3:14 And
if any man obey not
our word (now) by "THIS EPISTLE",
note that man, and
have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
So
whether by word or by epistle they spake
the same things, Paul demonstrates this here, and so does Acts 15:27 when a letter was sent what followed were those confirming the same by mouth.
This demonstrates that this is not "the ringing of bells" sort of traditions, but a tradition that after a walk and patern of behavior that the apostles demonstrated and expected them to walk in.