The dead are judged once and their judgment is described in Revelation 20:11-15. The seventh trumpet signals "the time of the dead, that they should be judged". This strongly supports amillennialism.
How does Revelation 11 possibly support Amil, in light of these things below throughout my post here? Look what all happens after the 7th trumpet has already sounded. You don't do those things to someone already dead, such as what is recorded in verse 15 and 19 below.
And the seventh angel sounded(Revelation 11:15)
And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come---and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth(Revelation 11:15)
and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail(Revelation 11:19)
Look how the ch ends. You seriously want us to believe that Revelation 20:11-15 is what is in view rather than Revelation 16 and the vials of wrath? What do you think it means in verse 15 when the text says--and thy wrath is come? You don't think that has anything to do with the vials of wrath recorded in Revelation 16?
Not to mention, until all of the lost dead are all dead first, in the meantime how can there be a resurrection of the lost dead if they are not even all dead after the 7th trumpet has sounded?
Does this sound like all of the lost are all dead at this point---And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come---and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth(Revelation 11:15)?
Does this sound like all of the lost are all dead at this point---and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail(Revelation 11:19)?
I'm certin it makes perfect sense that Revelation 20:11-15 involves an earthquake, and great hail during the great white throne judgment---not.
You insist context matters, right? Nothing per the context pertaining to Revelation 11:19 supports that Revelation 20:11-15 is in view, though.
Just because this is recorded in verse 15---and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great---that doesn't mean all of the dead, both saved and lost, are meant here. How can it mean the lost is meant here as well when Revelation 11:19 does not support that? Obviously, an earthquake and great hail is only relevant if there is still someone physically alive at the time.
Revelation 16:17 And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air; and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, It is done.
18 And there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and there was a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the earth, so mighty an earthquake, and so great.
19 And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath.
20 And every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.
21 And there fell upon men a great hail out of heaven, every stone about the weight of a talent: and men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail; for the plague thereof was exceeding great.
This seems to be where Revelation 11:19 left off. Then look at verse 19. the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell--which then might explain why the nations are angry at the time--Revelation 11:15.
Why does the great city get divided into three parts, which causes the cities of the nations to fall, after the 7th trump has sounded if after the 7th trump it is immediately the time pertaining to Revelation 20:11-15?
Not to mention, how are we to make any sense out of Revelation 16:19 in regards to the great city being divided into 3 parts when you per your ultra literal interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 have the entire planet literally engulfed in flames at the time? Assuming your interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 is correct, though clearly it is not, it makes verses like 19 in Revelation 16 redundant, since cities, in any sense, make zero sense if the entire planet is literally engulfed in flames at the time.
Not to mention, Revelation 16:21, as if it makes sense, that if the entire planet is literally engulfed in flames at the time, let's do this as well--And there fell upon men a great hail out of heaven, every stone about the weight of a talent: and men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail; for the plague thereof was exceeding great.
Wonder why they are not blaspheming God because they are literally being burned to a crisp(your interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12) because the planet is engulfed in flames? Obviously, you don't even recognize a contradiction when it is staring you straight in the face. Revelation 16:21 alone contradicts your interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12. No one would be complaining about great hail out of heaven at the time, if at the time the entire planet is literally engulfed in flames.
I have you all figured out after all these years. You have your theology all mapped out and that you keep it in this box of yours. That's what you argue from. You are unable and or unwilling to argue outside of that box you have your mapped out theology placed in. That's why you have quick answers for everything. I'm not saying you don't think outside of the box generally speaking. I'm saying you don't think outside of the box you have your mapped out theology placed in.