No, its RCC Roman Catholic Church - if you ever want a history lesson on its Roman origin, feel free to ask anytime.Ok, but FYI: It's Christian (Catholic), not Roman Catholic.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, its RCC Roman Catholic Church - if you ever want a history lesson on its Roman origin, feel free to ask anytime.Ok, but FYI: It's Christian (Catholic), not Roman Catholic.
No, its RCC Roman Catholic Church
I understand why you would want it not to be.It's actually not though.
I understand why you would want it not to be.
I'm not interested in the mother, or her daughters - they all drink from the same cup - as I said - please don't post Romanist dogma hereI know why you want it to be, but it's the Christian (Catholic) Church, which comprises over 20 Liturgical Rites, of which the Roman/Latin is only one. So, you just have Google "Liturgical Rites" within the Christian (Catholic) Church and you'll understand.
I'm not interested [...]
as I said - please don't post Romanist dogma here
So not in communion with the Pope of Rome?...interestingAnd, that's why there is so many misinformed people about the Christian (Catholic) Church.
This is not the thread to discuss your false doctrines sorry - feel free to start another if you so desire.I haven't because a Christian (Catholic) dogma is a truth divinely revealed by God and definitively proposed by the Church for belief, such as the Trinity or the Resurrection of Christ. Rather I corrected an error you made by explaining why the correct name is the "Christian (Catholic) Church", which is a description of the Christian faith and the Church that is universal and guided by the Pope, according to the Christian (Catholic) understanding.
So not in communion with the Pope of Rome?...interesting
This is not the thread to discuss your false doctrines sorry - feel free to start another if you so desire.
You are not quick on the uptake are you sabe? So deceived! As deceived as the ruler of the synagogue. You can leave now!You said that you're not interested in Catholicism, which is why I said it's that attitude which is the cause for so many being misinformed about the Christian (Catholic Church). The Christian (Catholic) Church is centered in Rome, Italy, and that is where the current Pope, or Head of the Christian (Catholic) Church, resides. The Pope always had many different titles. The Pope is not only the Vicar of Christ but also the Bishop of Rome. This tradition goes back to the holy apostle Peter, who was the first Bishop of Rome after Jesus Christ entrusted him with the task of leading the flock.
First, you're conflating the words "dogma" and "doctrine" within Catholicism (Google the difference). Second, I wasn't discussing any specific dogma or doctrine, but rather correcting your misapplication of the word "dogma" to my correcting your misnaming the "Christian (Catholic) Church".
You are not quick on the uptake are you sabe? So deceived! As deceived as the ruler of the synagogue. You can leave now!
But in your case, you will find a horrible truthIt's not the first time those of the truth were accused of working for the deceiver. Even Jesus was.
But in your case, you will find a horrible truth
2 Corinthians 6:17To those who are lost, but God will never cease to call them.
“Bound by Satan”
Some readers struggle with the description of this woman’s disability as “having a spirit of infirmity” and being “bound by Satan.” It seems that Jesus accepted the use of demoniac terminology because it approximated the truth. Both the good and the evil that humans experience fall under the governance of God’s angels; as the Psalmist describes, there are “angels of evil” (Psalm 78:49).
In this case, the woman’s affliction had been caused by such an angel, whom Jesus identified as “Satan” because, like the adversary in Job, he opposed her. The phrase “spirit of infirmity” simply signifies “the angel responsible for her affliction.” Viewed in this light, this and similar miracles take on even greater significance: they openly demonstrate Jesus’ ultimate authority over the angels and foreshadow the time when the activities of these “angels of evil” will no longer have any hold over humanity.
The term “evil angels” (AV) does not mean “wicked angels”, there are no such beings. All angels exist as ministers of God, carrying out His will (Hebrews 1:14). This includes those through whom the plagues fell on Egypt. Scriptures such as Isaiah 45:7 and Amos 3:6 make it clear that what humans perceive as “evil” or unpleasant experiences is under God’s control.
There are angels of blessing (Psalm 34:7; Matthew 18:10; Acts 12:7) and angels of “evil” (2 Samuel 24:16; Acts 12:23; 1 Corinthians 10:10; Proverbs 17:11; and numerous instances in Revelation; notably the “evil spirit” sent upon Saul in 1 Samuel 16:14). The RSV and NIV often translate this as a “band” or “company of destroying angels.” In the tenth plague, both angels of blessing and angels of “evil” were active in Egypt
I sent you a private message as a side note to the above. I am fully convinced that the angels God sent to administer the plagues in Egypt have carried out many mighty acts on His behalf throughout history, acts that many Christians mistakenly attribute to a fallen angel.Great topic @Hiddenthings, just one comment about Psalm 78:49
Ps 78:49 He cast upon them the fierceness of his anger, wrath, and indignation, and trouble, by sending evil angels among them. [KJV]
Ps 78:49 He let loose on them his burning anger, wrath, indignation, and distress, a company of destroying angels. [ESV]
Ps 78:49 He sendeth on them the fury of His anger, Wrath, and indignation, and distress--A discharge of evil messengers. [YLT]
Ps 78:49 He sent His burning anger against them: fury, indignation, and calamity — a band of deadly messengers. [HCSB]
Ps 78:49 His raging anger lashed out against them. He sent fury, rage, and trouble as messengers who bring disaster. [NET 2.1]
Psalm 78:49 - I Will Open My Mouth in Parables [more translations].
Whatever the right translation the context of v49 is the story of the Exodus and the 10 plagues, God punishing Pharaoh.
God did not punish the woman in Luke 13 and thus Psalm 78:49 doesn't apply to her.