M
Muna
Guest
I don't know.
Me neither
But what I do know is that she is implying that the Israeli government had something to do with his death.
Maybe, or maybe not, I do not know either, but gathering the facts and speaking about some of the surrounding circumstances to get the whole picture is a good thing.
Likely to draw more viewers to her channel.
It's drawn me because I want to know about some of the things she is laying out. You will naturally gather to the kind of information you are seeking on any given thing.
I think when people want to know about things the other channels might neglect there will always be someone willing to take that on and those who will give it an ear, and thats a good thing.
People who tell the truth and tell lies will draw a followingAlex Jones did this for years.
I cannot chase down every accusation and I refuse to agree together against a person or accuse people without proofs but I also don't want to get involved with chasing down links and going through video after video.He was later forced to admit in court that he "plays a character" on his show.
So AI is just handy for me in things I could care less about, and so this is what it says,
Alex Jones did not fully admit to playing a character, but his attorney, Randall Wilhite, stated during a 2017 custody battle that Jones was "playing a character" and described him as a "performance artist". This claim was made in the context of arguing that Jones's on-air persona should not be used to judge his fitness as a parent, with Wilhite comparing it to judging Jack Nicholson based on his role as the Joker in Batman.
While Jones denied on his show that he was playing a character—calling his program "the most bona fide, hard-core, real McCoy thing there is" —he later clarified in court that he generally agreed with his attorney's statement, though he disagreed with how the media interpreted the term "performance artist". Therefore, while Jones did not openly admit to performing as a fictional character, he acknowledged the "performance art" framing in a legal context, even as he maintained the authenticity of his message
Me too, and so do police whenever investigating a crime, but as AI points outI prefer to stick to the facts, and ignore unsubstantiated conspiracy theories or hearsay.
Police often have to theorize and reconstruct the sequence of events when investigating a crime, especially when direct evidence is limited. This process involves developing hypotheses about how a crime occurred based on physical evidence, witness statements, and other available information. The investigation may require piecing together disparate facts to form a coherent narrative of the incident.
This reconstruction is a standard part of criminal investigations, as many crimes are not witnessed directly, and the full picture may not be immediately apparent. The complexity of crime, including the fact that many crimes go unreported (a phenomenon known as the "dark figure of crime" , and that crime data can be inconsistent or incomplete , further necessitates careful analysis and theorizing by law enforcement. The process is not merely speculative; it is guided by evidence and logical reasoning to determine the most plausible explanation for how the crime unfolded.
Good to keep in mind while something is unfolding
