Continued from above
The 11 video is voiced over again is Candance in her white blouse here, which is shown in the seventh video posted
Charlie Kirk shooting suspect is charged and some questions remain. PreBorn! Donate securely by calling 855-601-2229 or by visiting https://preborn.com/candace GNO Land Learn more at http://gno.land/c
rumble.com
The voice over now brings in Candace as that one woman who was called crazy getting to the truth of things (after seeding the video with innuendo)
The 12th video voice over in (orange jacket again shown in the first video) now makes reference to her vindication (to everything it just seeded into the narrative)
The 13th video voice (in the purple plaid outfit) shown in the second video going on about how Candace (within this narrative) was right all along but everyone was blinded by the tears (of Erika)
At this point, its all made up, listen to it closely. And here (it says) is where things get darker it says, at 3:54 showing a voice over of a video (at around 28:58 minutes in) which is actually an interview with Milo
Netanyahu expected to push for plan to 'occupy' Gaza, Homeland Security gaslights us by denying tying FEMA funds to Israel stance, and Milo Yiannopoulos joins me for MAGA's funeral. Riverbend Ranch Ge
rumble.com
The video right after here, just brings in questions concerning the shooter, and a voice over clip of Joe Rogan asking the same question at 4:20 in as Candace and others are asking
Then from 4:40- 5:10 is the AI (or whoever it is) doing the voice over is insuating Erika is a suspicious character (not Candace) but brings in once again Candace in its voice over (in the purple plaid outfit) same as shown in the second video. Stating Candace stopped asking questionsand started accusing at 5:18 and begins showing an older video of Candace at TPUSA voicing over its own words (none of hers)
Again, (tired of counting at this point) the voice over begins over the same video in the purple plaid outfit telling us how it was Candace connecting these dots (when it is really doing the connecting)
Somewhere Candace supposedly went live and torched Ericka Kirk without sharing which video she did this on. Its not at all going down as this thing says.
At 6:10 the Second video is shown again (in a purple plaid outfit) speaking at 6 minutes in to 7 minutes here
Today we will discuss a psychological strategy known as the “David Hoggin” somebody. TPUSA is David Hogging us right now. PreBorn! Donate securely by calling 855-601-2229 or by visiting https://prebor
rumble.com
And there she is not telling us that Erika is not saying anything about NOT investigating Charlies death, BUT the influencers themselves are using Erika as a reason to tell Candace to back off of this investigation, so she (herself) is not raising suspicions on Erika, its very plain here.
Then the voice over comes in and says, "the internet split" some had thought she had gone to far (implying ??) but others said, "someone needed to say it" then proceeds to show us text comments to that same effect.
At 7:20 in the video it proceeds to do a voice over another video (which was an older interview) with Russel Brand (shes in light pink sweatshirt) which was 4 months before Charlie Kirk's death here
Russell Brand joins me to discuss the current state of politics, Hollywood, his faith journey, psychology, and more. Riverbend Ranch Get $20 off your first order with promo code: CANDACE at http://www
rumble.com
After this the voice over reads the text of another woman at 7:15 concerning how that woman felt it was not appropriate the voice over and out of nowhere said, "It all clicked" (for Candace that is) that the only reason Erika wasn't looking for truth was (drum roll) because she already knew it (the voice over implying the obvious) because when you add the ALLEDGED AFFAIR on top of that alleged silence, the picture becomes (drum roll) SINISTER.
At 7:28 BUT Candace speaking THAT truth (as it voices over) another older video from TPUSA this came at a cost....
Meaning Candace was saying what this AI (or whoever is voicing over) is saying. And the moment Candace went public with what IT is saying the knives came out ....then introduces texts from Erika implying these were meant for Candace
But the voice over even states at 7:47 that Erika did not name Candace but ... (drum roll) ...she didn't have to...
When there are videos which are out there (not Candaces) stating Erika is faking her grief (It couldnt be those though, no)
All you have to do is do a Youtube search " Erika kirk body language" Notice none of those are Candace (although the AI or the voice over
is telling us that Erika does not have to tell us that it is Candace calling into question her grief) while there are tons of people
doing this on Youtube (who she should not possibly be speaking of)
Then come the loyalty collapse at 7:54 (concerning all of the above, not of Candace) and everyone supposeldy turned on her overnight, and you know its fake because it brings in Laura Loomer (who is a Jew, Candace is ticking some of these off). And there is this battle, because of something Candace said,
Candace's question which was
aimed at the influencers themselves (which are telling her
to stop the investgation)
and saying to them (who were
using Erika as the excuse for her to shut up as if valid)
asking them, Why?
“
What kind of widow doesn’t want the truth about her husband’s murder to come out?” But this was twisted and made to appear it was directed at Erika (and implicate her, and they tie it altogether and big bad Candace)
Summing it up, the voice over goes into, "Once you line up those smiles (meaning Erikas, which it did) those calls and timing" (all of which it provided us through the New York times, itself) the voice over says,
concidence turns
into conspiracy.
So look who is showing Erikas smiles (the one who made that video, look who brought in the calls and timing as it shows us in the New york times, it was the one tha made the video.
The reason this was of great interest to me is because I trying to get a feel for how deceptive it will get and how someone can be framed, or moved by woke/ right left. I think Peter Theil is framing the anti Christ narrative to come through Luddism (similar to the old Luddites) they are coining those technophobes now. Apparently anti Christ to him is someone who is backing away from technology. You can look that up online. So there's a few things I am looking at, but I wanted to run a few of my own tests (for my own satisfation). One of which would be a kind of AI voice over spinning a narrative and weaponizing of information, to move an arm of people.
I shouldn't have posted all those video links, I should have just posted the name, they are really irrelevant in the final thought (Sorry about that). Good to be done with that.
Edit typo
