Western Political Schizophrenia: Staying Sane Is Mission Impossible.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine
When I talk about the largest-scale genocide of Christians in history and ask: “Why is the World Silent About the Largest Genocide of Christians in History?” — Ukrainian nationalists immediately reply: “You’re absolutely right, Hitler wrote exactly the same thing in Mein Kampf.”

Hitler was terrified that the Jews, if they kept their influence, would do to Germany exactly what they had already done to Russia. Here are his own words:

The Jew has always been a people without roots, a parasite in the body of other nations. In Russia we now see the final result of his rule: the destruction of the Christian order, the murder of millions, and terror under the leadership of the Bolsheviks, who are nothing other than instruments of Jewish world domination.
(Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapter 11)

In Mein Kampf, Hitler pointed to Russia as the example of what he feared for Germany. He claimed that Jews were the ideologists and organizers of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, using communism to destroy traditional societies, religion, and Christianity in particular. He wrote that the Bolsheviks — whom he equated with Jews — exterminated millions, including Christians, the aristocracy, and peasants, and he called it a “genocide” against “normal” society.

But then Russians — citizens of the Russian Federation — start yelling: “If you agree with these facts, you’re a Nazi, you’re rehabilitating Hitler, you’re turning into a Banderite! Better remember that Hitler despised Slavs almost as much as he despised Jews!”

Ukrainian nationalists shoot back: “If you refuse to acknowledge these historical facts, you’re justifying the bloodiest genocide of Christians in history!”

Ukrainian Orthodox believers, including those of the UOC, Uniates, Protestants and Catholics, add: “How can anyone deny the obvious? The Bolsheviks were Satanists! How can you ignore their atrocities, mass murders, the Holodomor, the repressions?”

Ukrainian nationalist historians clarify: “The Russians are lying, classic ‘haven’t read it but condemn it.’ None of them has ever opened Mein Kampf.” And there Hitler writes about Russians like this:

Never forget that the rulers of present-day Russia are bloodthirsty criminals, the scum of humanity, who in a tragic hour took advantage of circumstances, seized a great state, slaughtered thousands of the leading intelligentsia in wild bloodlust, and for almost ten years now have been carrying out the cruelest and most tyrannical regime of all time. Never forget that these rulers belong to a race that combines a rare mixture of bestial cruelty and an incredible gift for lying, and which today more than ever feels called upon to impose its bloody oppression on the rest of the world. Never forget that the international Jew who completely dominates Russia today sees Germany not as an ally, but as a state destined for the same fate.
(Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapter 14)

The most terrifying example of this kind is furnished by Russia, where he [the Jew] killed or starved about thirty million people with truly fanatical savagery, in part under inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock-exchange bandits domination over a great people.
(Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapter 11)

Hitler called the Russians “a great people” and Russia “a great state” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapters 11 & 14), but believed they had been “enslaved” by the Bolsheviks, whom he identified as Jews.

In the USSR, the anti-religious policy led to the closure of almost 29,000 Orthodox churches by 1940, the murder of roughly 100,000 priests, and millions of Christian victims — the largest persecution of Christians in history. In Nazi Germany, by contrast, more than 2,000 churches were built, and Hitler never openly campaigned against Christianity, unlike the openly faith-hostile policy of the Soviet leadership.

It all seems to add up, it all looks convincing.​


But the Western community declares: “If you agree with any of this, you’re an antisemite, you’re rehabilitating Nazism and Hitler, you’re denying the Holocaust, you’re bad, very bad, we don’t do that here!”​


At the same time The Western community adds: “If you disagree with the Ukrainians, you’re justifying the atrocities of the Red Terror, you’re a Putinist, an enemy! No Google Ads for you, no EU work visa, you’re a third-rate separatist. Go back to your LDPR and disagree with Ukrainian nationalists there!”​


In Russia, meanwhile — both atheists and the heirs of the Soviet executioners — say: “We don’t need your talk about any ‘massive genocide of Christians.’ Don’t rock the boat and don’t quarrel with the descendants of Satanists. The main thing is stability of power!” Just endure, keep quiet, and pray that these ruling Satanists don’t do it again.

In short, it’s a total zugzwang. Everywhere you move, you’re screwed.

Complete schizophrenia.​

 

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine
51346_2000.jpg
American liberal outlets like CNN and MSNBC are trapped in full-blown ideological schizophrenia.

On one hand, they weep for the “oppressed” Palestinians and repeat that the ICJ has declared Israel’s actions in Gaza a “plausible genocide.”
On the very next segment, the same anchors defend Israel’s “right to self-defense” and call any criticism of it antisemitism.

The mental gymnastics get even wilder when they switch topics:
- Trump’s border wall and deportations = literal fascism that “causes migrant riots.”
- Hamas rockets and the October 7 massacre = unforgivable terrorism that can never be contextualized.

So apparently:
- When illegal immigrants riot in Los Angeles, it’s a justified uprising against oppression.
- When Palestinians living under military occupation fire rockets, it’s pure evil with no possible excuse.

Same “oppressed group,” completely opposite verdict.

This isn’t just inconsistency — it’s selective morality on steroids. Israel can be accused of apartheid and genocide yet still remain the West’s sacred ally because geopolitics > principles. Meanwhile, any brown person storming the US border is a noble victim of imperialism… until he’s in Gaza, then he suddenly turns into a terrorist.

The audience is noticing. Young progressives who chant “Free Palestine” are starting to call out CNN for the hypocrisy. Conservatives just laugh and say “told you so.” Trust in liberal media is collapsing because nobody can keep defending two completely contradictory storylines at the same time without sounding insane.

Bottom line: today’s mainstream liberalism wants to have its moral superiority and its aircraft-carrier alliance with an Israeli flag on it too. The result is ideological schizophrenia so severe that staying sane while watching these channels has become mission impossible.
 

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine
51054_original.png

"Can One Be a Zionist-Nazi-Racist and a Cultural Marxist at the Same Time?"​


The Republican Party in the US has long been associated with support for Zionism, often using rhetoric about the inviolability and impunity of the Jewish people and Israel to advance policies that, in the view of critics, resemble ideas of racial superiority. Their position is fairly transparent: defending Israel and its policies aligns with conservative values that emphasize nationalism and traditional hierarchies. Republicans support deporting illegal migrants and building a wall on the Mexican border. All of this is straightforward. However, the situation with the Democratic Party is far more complex and, as it may seem, internally contradictory.

In recent decades, the Democratic Party has bet on so-called "cultural Marxism"—an ideology that divides society into oppressors and the oppressed. In this paradigm, white people, especially those of European descent, are seen as historical oppressors, while other groups—racial, ethnic, or religious minorities—are considered oppressed. This ideology has formed the basis of the party's policies aimed at protecting minority rights, promoting social justice, and fighting systemic inequality. For many years, this strategy has allowed Democrats to consolidate support among diverse groups, from African Americans to immigrants.

However, in recent years, the Democratic Party has found itself in a difficult position due to its support for Israel. As a US ally, Israel receives significant military and political backing from the American establishment, including Democrats. This raises questions, especially in light of Israel's actions in the Palestinian territories. The International Court of Justice has indicated a plausible genocide in the Gaza Strip, and the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes. Some Israeli officials use rhetoric that sounds outright racist, calling Palestinians "Amalek" or "subhumans."

This support for Israel puts the Democratic Party in an awkward spot. How can one simultaneously advocate for the rights of oppressed peoples, including Palestinians, and back a state that, according to international organizations and a significant portion of the Democratic electorate, violates human rights? This contradiction is perceived as an attempt to sit on two chairs at once: on one hand, Democrats promote cultural Marxism, defending oppressed groups, and on the other, they support policies that critics label as Zionism, Nazism, or racism.
 

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine

The Schizophrenia of American Liberalism​


This combination of ideas produces outright ideological schizophrenia.

American liberal media outlets like CNN and MSNBC routinely do both things in the same breath: defend Israel’s actions by invoking its “right to self-defense” while pushing the cultural-Marxism agenda and expressing heartfelt sympathy for the oppressed — including the very Palestinians being bombed by that same Israel. The result is glaring cognitive dissonance: how do you cheer for the oppressed people of Gaza in one segment and then justify the policies of a state that many accuse of apartheid or even genocide in the next?

A perfect illustration of this paradox is President Joe Biden, the public face of the Democratic Party. Biden loves to repeat the line his father taught him: “You don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist.” He has said it on multiple occasions — during his 2022 visit to Israel, at the White House Hanukkah menorah lighting in December 2023, and in numerous other speeches. For him, the phrase means that Zionism is simply support for the existence and security of Israel as a Jewish state, and you don’t need to be Jewish by birth or faith to hold that position.

In the American context, Zionism is thus framed as a purely political stance, not an ethnic or religious one. Yet the question remains: how does that stance possibly square with cultural Marxism, an ideology that explicitly rejects nationalism, ethno-states, and any notion of racial or ethnic superiority?

How do you simultaneously champion an ideology dedicated to defending oppressed peoples and defend policies that green-light occupation, displacement, and violence against one of those very peoples?
 

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine

Right and Left: An Impossible Synthesis​

Combining Zionism and cultural Marxism within a single party isn’t just difficult; it’s logically impossible.

Zionism in its current form is inextricably tied to nationalism, ethnic particularism, and the idea of a Jewish ethno-state. Cultural Marxism, by contrast, preaches universalism, the dissolution of all national and ethnic privileges, and absolute equality of outcome for historically oppressed groups.

By trying to weld these two diametrically opposed worldviews together, the Democratic Party risks alienating both camps: the progressive wing that demands uncompromising solidarity with every oppressed people (including Palestinians), and the pro-Israel establishment that expects unconditional backing no matter what.

This double game leaves American liberalism wide open to attack. To anyone paying attention to the Middle East, the spectacle looks like a cynical attempt to please everyone at once; and, predictably, it ends up convincing no one. That’s a big reason why millions have simply stopped watching liberal outlets, where breathless sermons about social justice air right next to justifications for policies that blatantly violate everything those sermons claim to stand for.

Conclusion

The U.S. Democratic Party is now trapped in its own contradictions. By simultaneously embracing cultural Marxism and Zionism, it projects ideological incoherence on a spectacular scale. This doesn’t just erode trust in the party; it raises a deeper, more uncomfortable question:

Can a genuinely left-wing ideology of social justice ever be reconciled with support for a political project widely seen as nationalist, exclusivist, or even racist?
 

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine

The "superior" race is clearing living space of "subhumans" for the good of the entire world.​

Gs3nkaQW0AABgsL.jpeg
On October 28, 2023, Netanyahu publicly invoked “Remember what Amalek has done to you” (1 Samuel 15:3), a biblical command in Jewish tradition that calls for the total annihilation of an enemy people — men, women, children, and livestock (Haaretz, Oct 2023).

In Gaza today:
- 54,000 dead, including 20,000 children
- 85% of schools destroyed
(UN OCHA, 2024)

The International Court of Justice (Jan 26, 2024) ruled that Israel’s actions constitute a “plausible genocide.”
The International Criminal Court is pursuing Netanyahu for the blockade and related war crimes (arrest warrants issued Nov 2024).

This is what “clearing the area of Amalek” looks like in practice.

The term “human animals” (Hebrew: בהמות אדם, behemot adam — literally “human beasts” or “animal-like humans”) has been repeatedly used by senior Israeli officials to describe Palestinians. Key examples:

1. Yoav Gallant, Israeli Defense Minister (Oct 9, 2023)
Announcing a “complete siege” of Gaza (no electricity, water, food, or fuel), he declared:
“We are fighting human animals, and we are acting accordingly.”
The statement drew immediate condemnation from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International for dehumanization and incitement to war crimes.

2. Eli Ben-Dahan, Deputy Defense Minister (2013, later in charge of the Civil Administration in the West Bank)
In a radio interview on peace talks:
“To me, Palestinians are like animals, they are not human.”

3. Dan Gillerman, former Israeli ambassador to the UN (Oct 26, 2023)
On Sky News, dismissing UN concern over Gaza’s humanitarian crisis:
“We are not fighting human beings — we are fighting horrible, inhuman animals.”

4. Rabbi Meir Maroz (Nov 2023, Channel 7 Israel)
“If the people of Gaza were human, we would send them humanitarian aid… but they are animals.”

Such rhetoric is not new:
- Menachem Begin in 1982 called Palestinians “beasts walking on two legs.”
- Chief of Staff Rafael Eitan in 1983 compared Palestinians to “drugged cockroaches in a bottle.”

This is the language that accompanies the policy on the ground.

On one hand, high-ranking Israeli officials are openly declaring that the "superior" race is clearing living space of "subhumans" for the good of the entire world.

When arguing with Zionists, I ask them to acknowledge this outright. But at that point, every Zionist I've talked to starts squirming. Suddenly, they've been "misunderstood," "it's not that simple," "things aren't really what they seem"—and on and on it goes. With this cowardly behavior, Zionists back themselves into a corner. And that's when I write to them:

Either stand your ground all the way: you are the "superior race," liberating living space from "human animals" (Gallant, 2023) and "Amaleks" (Netanyahu, Haaretz, 2023). Then it all makes sense. You Zionists are the engine of global Nazism, waving the banner of racism and genocide as the solution to the "problem of excess subhumans." Be honest about your superiority over the Palestinians and Arabs whom you dehumanize.

Or admit that the liberals and cultural Marxists are right. Agree that Israel expelled the Palestinians in 1948 (Nakba, 700,000 refugees, UN Resolution 194), occupied Gaza and the West Bank in 1967 (UN Resolution 242), and has maintained the blockade of Gaza since 2007: 54,000 dead, 20,000 children (UN OCHA, 2024). The ICJ (Jan 26, 2024) sees a "plausible genocide," and the ICC is pursuing Netanyahu (November 2024). Then repent, hand Netanyahu over to The Hague, and rectify your crimes.

Choose: right or left. Because in one place, you're the "chosen people" fighting for the "good of the civilized world," and in another—"oh, that's not what we meant." With this behavior, you Zionists are condemning yourselves.
 

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine
The madness of the world with Jews will never stop, until....
un-resolution-to-establish-a-palestinian-state-v0-pa0jcy215uof1-1-jpeg.73659

In this case, the Israelis in Israel are openly conducting a policy of genocide. No one in Israel even hides it. Top officials openly declare their intentions and their position.

Their position is logical, sincere, argued, and clear as day—just like Hitler's book Mein Kampf. When you listen to Netanyahu, it makes you want to raise your hand and shout Sieg Heil!

The question is something else.

1. Why is it that when the speeches of official Israeli officials cross the borders of Israel into the international information space, the Israelis' position shifts from crystal clear, understandable, and logical to the position of "you misunderstood us"? By doing this, they're essentially admitting that they're wrong. If a person is doing what they believe is right, they don't need to make excuses or convince others that they've been misunderstood.
GrGdweoWYAA0LBk.jpeg
2. Liberal globalist media demonstrate unimaginable ideological schizophrenia in covering the conflict around Gaza, Israel, and Iran. On one hand, they express sympathy for the Palestinian people, emphasizing the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, where the International Court of Justice has recognized genocide as plausible, the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes, and Amnesty International has directly accused Israel of genocide.

However, in the very same reports, these media outlets justify Israel's actions, citing its right to self-defense. This duality reaches absurdity when Israel strikes Iran, which positions itself as a defender of the Palestinians, and Iran responds with a counterstrike. Western liberal media unequivocally support Israel, ignoring their own narratives about protecting the oppressed. What kind of spectacular schizophrenic nonsense is this? How can you simultaneously mourn the suffering of Palestinians, acknowledge the likelihood of genocide, and support Israel? Such inconsistency not only undermines trust in liberal media but also exposes their inability to adhere to a single moral position, turning their rhetoric into a caricature of the principles of justice.
 

Chrysostomos

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2025
864
309
63
Kiev
Faith
Christian
Country
Ukraine
Снимок экрана от 2024-12-18 11-57-15.png
BEHOLD, THE ILLEGITIMATE SPAWN OF THE GREAT HARLOT infest the halls of power in Washington!
These bastard sons of the Babylonian harlot—American politicians, red and blue—have sold the sacred interests and good name of the American people for thirty pieces of AIPAC silver!

Born in the fornication of transnational capital, they pimp American Republic like Judas, trading honor for shekels while the Whore laughs.“

Woe to the bloody city!
Full of lies and robbery!”
Awake, betrayed nation!

COME OUT OF HER, MY PEOPLE!
The Lamb cometh to judge every bought hand.

MARANATHA!
51859_1000.jpg
Josh (Josh Hawley) is an American senator from Missouri, a member of the Republican Party. He posted a tweet calling people to pray for Israel.

In response, one user (MrBElved) asks Grok how much money Josh got from AIPAC. Grok replies that, according to OpenSecrets data, Josh received $119,205 from AIPAC and related sources between 2019 and 2024, including $109,205 from individuals and $10,000 from PACs.