David in NJ
Well-Known Member
my post #32Love you to Brother, glad you stopped by the thread. Looking forward to your input.
have to step out - will be back later
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
my post #32Love you to Brother, glad you stopped by the thread. Looking forward to your input.
The scriptures speak for themselves. The outside sources are just a bonus. The words of Christ are more than sufficient to make the case for His early return.Sorry Archie, I guess I should have spoken a little more clearly here. I have nothing against the historical writings of Flavius Josephus, he seems to be well received, giving a notable, though sometimes questionable accounting of the "Antiquities of the Jews". Many consider his work to be a vital source for the history of the intertestamental period and the Jewish war against Rome.
The problem for me arises when doctrines are established and built from outside sources. Since Preterit doctrine is dependent upon outside sources rather than the Word of God, I find the doctrine to be suspect. You may not call yourself a Preterit but that is the doctrine the videos promote and defend. I agree that we absolutely must hold the Word(s) of Christ in the highest esteem, and believe He says what He means, and means what He says. I really don't mean to be offensive or condescending in my replies, but I am very passionate about finding truth from the one source that is all truth: the Bible.
I do! Tell me when you think it is, if you know.You don't know?
Are you suggesting that His return was not imminent, as He and all the Apostles clearly taught that it was.
40 years is not a long time in the grand scheme of things, and fits perfectly with His numerous other statements concerning "this generation". 2000 years however, if one trusts that number, which I do not, is a very long time, and directly contradicts the words of Jesus Christ addressed to His audience in Judea, and His words given to John for the 7 churches.
40 years is not "imminent"
What insults?Post again but remove the foolish insults.
Whats to dwell on?One point for you to dwell on for now! If the return of Jesus was imminent in the first century AD how does 40 years later fit? For that matter how does almost 2,000 years later fit?
Revelation 22:7 (KJV) Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.
Revelation 22:10 (KJV) And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.
Revelation 22:12 (KJV) And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
Revelation 22:20 (KJV) He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
Whats to dwell on?
How I can twist His words into meaning something they did not?
He came quickly. What more explanation is required?
Christ kept His word.
Christ never used the word "imminent" that's an inference based upon the text, specifically the words spoken by His Apostles.
When Christ Himself spoke of His return, He did so with even greater urgency. He said "behold I come quickly", and not once but three separate times in succession.
And He did so not forty years from His return, but at least 30 years after His ascension.
Sorry, but no.It is not the second coming of Christ that comes quickly, shortly, speedily, or without delay! Rather that which comes quickly, speedily, shorty or without delay is Christ coming in us through His Spirit as we know and spiritually enter the Kingdom of God in heaven when we have been born again.
Sorry, but no.
That was however, a very nice gospel message, thank you.
But none of those passages have anything at all to do with the imminent return of Christ. Neither do they support any of the spiritualizations that you made in your statement quoted above.
Let's stick with text shall we?
And let's most definitely, stick with the context.
What did Christ actually say?
Whom was He speaking to when He said it?
Jesus told us and i posted it = trust the LORDI do! Tell me when you think it is, if you know.
You do not take Christ at His word.You cannot biblically prove what you allege Archie! I don't believe you're twisting the Words of Christ, but I do believe you have been influenced, believing "quickly" is defined 30 to 40 or almost 2000 years from the time Christ spoke these words.
The second coming?Jesus told us and i posted it = trust the LORD
Well thanks for stopping by.It seems I'm just wasting my time. I initially responded because I thought you had recently become indoctrinated by the doctrine of Preterism. It seems I was mistaken, because you don't bother to address the points raised that refute the opinion that Christ says His second and only coming again would be quick or soon meaning 30 years from the time He spoke. That tells me your real interest is trying to convince others the doctrine of Preterits is truth therefore we should believe what you can only allege but cannot biblically prove. Thanks for the discussion.
From Genesis to Revelation = only one 2nd ComingThe second coming?
Not so. Its right there in black and white and red. You on the other hand, a chosen disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ, for some inexplicable reason, are incapable of putting your faith and trust in the clearly spoken words of your Master.You cannot biblically prove what you allege Archie! I don't believe you're twisting the Words of Christ, but I do believe you have been influenced, believing "quickly" is defined 30 to 40 or almost 2000 years from the time Christ spoke these words.
From Genesis to Revelation = only one 2nd Coming


Ah - so you think you have me on that = no chance!If the last or final or concluding day is the second coming, how can you have more days, weeks and years after that?
I'm sorry brother, its hard to read your chart on my little phone. It looks similar to the timeline Brother Andy has in the second video posted below. If you would be so kind to check out his timeline and point out where you agree or disagree it would be greatly appreciated.@Archie
Ezekiel 38-39 is latter days, latter years. Ezekiel 39 provides the framework for the 7 years that precede Jesus's return (first chart). And there are 15 time of the end events timeframes in the bible that fit in that 7 years (second chart). So the partial preterist view is correct.
View attachment 75117
View attachment 75118