Yes, you keep saying that but haven’t provided a single SHRED of evidence.
I gave you 4 verses in Revelation and it is discussed by all NT authors as eminent.
Tools
Rev 3:11
“Behold,[fn] I am coming quickly! Hold fast what you have, that no one may take your crown.
Tools
Rev 22:7
“Behold, I am coming quickly! Blessed
is he who keeps the words of the prophecy of this book.”
Tools
Rev 22:12
“And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward
is with Me, to give to every one according to his work.
Tools
Rev 22:20
He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming quickly.” Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus!
Just remember that he is coming slowly like a turtle.
HUH?? What are you talking about? Nobody “built” the Scriptures. God id the author and inspired men to write it down.
You said, 'gave
you fail to understand that the Bible came out of the Church
But this is not true. It was with many splinters of "orthodoxy" including Nestorian. The Hebrew Scriptures were also ignored by the RCC and Eastern Orthodox for a long time. And God is not the author but is the inspiration.
The Catholic Church declared the Canon of Scripture. The Church compiled and decided which Books belong in the NT Canon under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. In other words – GOD decided the Canon and revealed it through His Church.
They failed to do it in the 1st century. I wonder why.
As for the OT – it already existed. However, 7 Books were removed in the 2nd century – AFTER Christ and AFTER the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. A non-authoritative rabbinical school at Jabneh led by a man named Rabbi Akiva. The two main points discussed at this rabbinical gathering were:
a. A man named Simon Bar Kokhba was the "real" messiah. He turned out to be a false messiah and Akiva was a false prophet.
b. The 7 Deuterocanonical Books needed to be removed from the OPEN Canon of the time - and the canon closed.
The Church preserved the 7 Books in the Canon that were previously removed in the 2nd century by the non-authoritative rabbinical gathering.
Interesting, but irrelevant to the Christian faith mostly. The 7 books are crackpot stories and wisdom.
Sorry, pal – but the weight of Greek scholarship is against you. In fact the evidence is so overwhelming that I can’t post it all because of space constraints.
It is neither for nor against. Another of your blunders.
HOW unEXPECTED!
And this has NOTHING to do with the point I was making – that the word Jesus used for “Rock “in Matt. 16:16 was “kapha”. Kepha can ONLY be translated as “Rock”. And of course it is being used metaphorically here.
Jesus wasn't saying the Pater was an actual rock . . .
It has everything to do with it. The Eastern Catholics don't agree with the Latiners' interpretations, or what they see in their eyes as heresy. Jesus was the other rock, and cornerstone, but what is the cornerstone of Rome. Peter? Mary?
As I educated you in my last post – this is why Paul refers to Peters as “Cephas” in his letters, which is a Greek transliteration of the Aramaic, Kepha . . .
Yes, but Latin and Aramaic/hebrew are rarely used in the New Testament. The genders also make a big difference. If it is only about size, then it is still different kinds of rock.