ROFLMAO. Evidence against what you say is not evidence. Evidence against evolution is not evolution! Brilliant.
It has so many applications:
- Evidence against rape is not rape.
- Evidence against a hypothesis is not that hypothesis.
Have you ever considered what a reasonable
rejection criteria would look like against the hypothesis of evolution? Obviously, you present a mind only open to acceptance criteria.
As I wrote, selective inbreeding causes all kinds of genetic and biological issues. That does not relate to evolution. There is no loss of information. You do not understand basic principles regarding biology/evolution that a person in High School would easily be able to understand. You did not defend your position or counter what I posted. You instead claimed, without explanation, that it
was evidence and equated it to denying rape.
Creationists contend that all mutations result in a lack of information. I suppose they imagine it like a book in which if you spill ink on it you lost information. They often seem only able to grasp child-like analogies. Like the blocks with letters, you can't roll them randomly and get a sentence. If you change a letter in a sentence, then it isn't right and you lost the word and thus, the sentence.
Mutations are the result of many factors. What generally matters in terms of evolution are mutations that arise in the production and recombination of haploid cells (sperm, egg). Humans get 23 chromosomes from dad and 23 of the same set of chromosome from mom. 22 from each parent are called autosomes as each parent gives a matching, identical set. The other pair are called sex chromosome. Dad has X and Y and mom has X and X. If the parents both offer an X, it is a girl and one of the X chromosomes is deactivated. If instead dad gives a Y, you have a boy. The Y is useless, but it has a gene that results in a male. No information is "lost" in by deactivation in one of the two X chromosomes in girls. Human only need one active X. The girl will then pass down one of the X, activated or deactivated to her child. Having both active is not good.
//IMPORTANT I am describing how things generally work before anyone gets snarky. There are weird exceptions with extra chromosomes. Sometimes a boy with XY has a non-functional Y and appears female, or has a functional Y but the body doesn't react. It can get super fun when you have fraternal twins and you have one person with the DNA of what should have been two fraternal siblings.
As for the other 22 pairs- they are complimentary sets, one from mom and one from dad. The issue with DNA is that dad has some genes that are not going to make for good proteins. That is okay, because the same chromosome from mom makes up for it. Mom has some bad genes to, but dad makes up for it.
This is why inbreeding is an issue. If a sperm cell has your mom's maternal autosome 1 and it is combined with her maternal autosome 1, you have a cell with the two copies of the same autosome chromosome. Another way, your mom has a copy of the KJV and the ESB. She gave you a copy of the KJV dad gave you NIV. She has an egg with a copy of the KJV and now you are combining it with a your sperm which also has a KJV, so the cell has 2 KJV. This is just an easy example (NOTHING TO DO WITH THE BIBLE)... suppose the KJV has errors, that is how DNA works, you have two sets of the same thing with the same errors.
In a better way these are the same segments of your DNA. + is good and X is bad. They do not line up.
This is ok.
++++++++X+++++++X++++++ dad
+X++++++++++++++++++X++ mom
When their son marries a girl that is unrelated, he gives mom's
+X++++++++++++++++++X++ son
+++++++X+++X+++++++++++ son's wife contribution
Great news! A few bad proteins, but no one cares. One makes up for the other!
This, however, is a problem:
+X++++++++++++++++++X++ a incestuous brother's contribution from his mom
+X++++++++++++++++++X++ his incestuous sister's contribution from their mom
Kids is now:
+X++++++++++++++++++X++ Maternal copy
+X++++++++++++++++++X++ Paternal copy
Genetically (and psychologically) messed up.
Dogs are selectively inbred. They produce offspring based on a forced, limited gene pool and that is why they have issues.
In natural selection, it is the conditions of the environment that favor certain mutations over time. Here, we find an O which is helpful.
+++++++O+++X+++++++++++
+++X+++O+++++++++++++++
Kid now makes an advantageous protein.
When attempting to save an endangered species, they try to add new genes to the genetic pool. This is why you can probably get away with marrying a first cousin, but if it is a common thing, you end up with health issues. Hence, why it is illegal.
Some species are not as prone to this as others.
