Do you observe the Jewish Sabbath? The fourth commandment.No, I never said that. You may be be confusing me with someone else. I mean the moral law, written in the heart of men, of which even the heathen know about, as you can read in Romans 2.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Do you observe the Jewish Sabbath? The fourth commandment.No, I never said that. You may be be confusing me with someone else. I mean the moral law, written in the heart of men, of which even the heathen know about, as you can read in Romans 2.
We do indeed turn away from looking to the law. You seem to be struggling with this. Obedience is not gained by looking to the law, it is gained by looking to Christ, and trusting him. The more we look to Christ and trust him, relying on the spirit for our sanctification, the more the fruits of the spirit grow in our lives(Gal5:22) Against that fruit there is no law(verse23) That is the way to live as God desires us to live, and we in our hearts desire to live, for God has put that desire in our hearts and minds. Jesus will be no ones saviour from sin unless they in their heart desire to live as his father wants them to live. You only get a saviour from sin because God has placed his laws in your heart, hence that is the first thing mentioned in the covenant.This is a good discussion, thanks.
I don't see why I would look at something that is the transitory ministry that brought condemnation and death and seek to obey it.
What would I hope to gain except condemnation and death?
I understand that there is some value in the law as a backdrop to understand where we came from religiously.
But it seem to me that the Apostle is instructing us to turn away from the law and follow the better way of the Spirit.
He has made us ministers of a new covenant, not the old covenant.
2 Corinthians 3:6 NIV
He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—
not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.
Galatians 3:23-25 NIV
Before the coming of this faith,[a] we were held in custody under the law,
locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed.
24 So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith.
25 Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.
Really? if the law was written on the hearts of men at creation Adam and Eve would then have been able to differentiate between good and evil immediately, however, they had to eat the forbidden fruit first to have their eyes opened!As given at Sinai yes, but the law is older than Sinai. The law was originally written on the hearts of men at their creation.
They were disobedient, they were told not to eat the appleWhy did God punish them if they didn't know what they were doing?
There is a huge difference between disobeying an instruction of God and having your eyes opened to good and evilSo they did know that it was evil?
Well according to the bible, and it is very plainly written adam and eve did not know of good and evil until they ate the forbidden fruit, then their eyes were opened, not before. Respectfully, if you don't accept what the bible plainly states on the matter neither will you accept anything I sayIf I don't know good and evil, I am not capable of doing evil. However, the bible every states that Adam and Eve were disobedient, and "sin" came into the world through one man, Adam. Sin is a synonym for evil. How does that work if only after eating the fruit they knew good and evil in the sense you describe?
Accept what I have shown you from the bible, then I will address your questiondid Adam sin or no?
Do you accept the bible states their eyes were only opened to good and evil once they had eaten the apple, not before?We do theology here, I try to understand your point, not winning an argument. Therefore I need some clarification and definitions from you.
So, would you say Adam sinned or no?
Of course I read that their eyes were opened, but I reject the interpretation you give of it, because of other scriptures.
On that I agree. You can say they sinned by eating the apple in respect of being disobedient to God, however, the biblical definition of sin, as you know is transgression of the law(or the main definition.Yes, but their eyes were opened in the sense of personal experience of sin.
Of course he knew it was wrong, but that is a whole different ball game to becoming aware of good and evil in a general sense.Then, tell me: did Adam know it was wrong to disobey God?
You're trying really hard aren't you. He knew it was wrong, but he didn't know of sin in a general sense until his eyes were opened did he. He didn't feel ashamed of being naked until his eyes were opened. And however hard you try, it was only once he ate the apple he was aware of good and evil in a general sense. A child would know it is wrong to disobey their parents, but they wouldnt generally understand much about about good and evil would theyHow so? Where did he get that knowledge from?
No, I try to get clarification from you, because this has immense implications.
First: what do you mean by "general sense"? You need to be specific here.
Secondly: wrong/sin is for me synonymous. If Adam did "wrong", then he did "sin", since that, according to the Bible, or the God of the Bible, is really the same thing. And personal experience of sin, of course he only had after eating the fruit, because beforehand he was holy, now he was not.
So, if you agree with me here: All this implies that before Adam sinned, he know it was sin, and therefore God punished him. "Did I not tell you you shall not eat of the fruit?" It's really very simple. Adam knew he should obey God. He knew what was right, and what was wrong notionally or rationally. But only afterwards he knew it also experimentally.
He knew it was wrong to disobey God, just as a child knows it is wrong to disobey their parents. Would a child recognise as sin disobeying their parents? Im sure they would not. BTW, there is no immense implications here, un less that is you make a god out of head theology. Hope you don'tNo, I try to get clarification from you, because this has immense implications.
First: what do you mean by "general sense"? You need to be specific here.
Secondly: wrong/sin is for me synonymous. If Adam did "wrong", then he did "sin", since that, according to the Bible, or the God of the Bible, is really the same thing. And personal experience of sin, of course he only had after eating the fruit, because beforehand he was holy, now he was not.
So, if you agree with me here: All this implies that before Adam sinned, he knew it was sin, and therefore God punished him. "Did I not tell you you shall not eat of the fruit?" It's really very simple. Adam knew he should obey God. He knew what was right, and what was wrong notionally or rationally. But only afterwards he knew it also experimentally.
There is so much confusion upon your part in your OP, and throughout, that it is a marvel (to me) that you do not see the glaring contradictory nature inherent in your position. So saying, this is not meant to offend uneccessarily."For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ." - John 1:17 NIV
...
Perhaps quoting the entire verse in context would help.... It began with the forerunner, John the Baptizer, leading the way. "For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John." - Matthew 11:13 NIV
Until John? Then what?
...
The phrase "heard that it was said ..." is not a reference to that "which is written" (directly), but to that which is spoken by Pharisees / Rabbis (doctors of the law, lawyers), in their midrashes, or commentary upon the written scriptures. In other words, Jesus is contrasting the words of fallen men, with Himself "the Word", which is parallel to the written "word" of God (since it is just a word picture of Jesus).In Matthew chapter five, Jesus refers to the law as hearsay and challenges it. There are five "You have heard that it was said... but I tell you..." statements. ...
Jesus in no way violated the Sabbath Law (Exo. 20:8-11 KJB)....
The most obvious examples are Jesus violating the Sabbath law. (I'll probably get lots of push-back on that) I'm not claiming that Jesus sinned.
...
Joh 9:16 Therefore said some of the Pharisees, This man is not of God, because he keepeth not the sabbath day. Others said, How can a man that is a sinner do such miracles? And there was a division among them.... John 9:16 NIV
Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.”
But others asked, “How can a sinner perform such signs?” So they were divided.
John 5:18 NIV
For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath,
but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.
...
Consider the context:...
Galatians 3:23-25 NIV
Before the coming of this faith,[a] we were held in custody under the law,
locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed.
24 So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith.
25 Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.
]
Continuing:...
Galatians 3:23-25 NIV
Before the coming of this faith,[a] we were held in custody under the law,
locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed.
24 So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith.
25 Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.
]