I'd say that's between me and God.What is you relationship between obeying the10Cs and your state of salvation?
NOT between me and you.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'd say that's between me and God.What is you relationship between obeying the10Cs and your state of salvation?
You're wrong, I don't believe that. You've made the wrong assumption. Stop guessing what I believe or think!The Father is one. You do not understand the nature of His unity with the Son because you think the holy Spirit is a third person of a mysteriously three part god who told his people that he is one.
Good. I believe that too.My God is THE God and He is one, singular, the Father, the Creator, and distinctly above and over His Son as all things.
Good. I believe that too.The God of truth is only good, there is no evil in Him. He does not torment anyone. It is a human contrived wickedness to inflict everlasting torment on an enemy. This is profound vitriol.
You're wrong about that. God's name is YHVH (Yahavah), translated as Yahweh in the WEB:God is one. His name is I Am.
You're wrong, I don't believe that. You've made the wrong assumption. Stop guessing what I believe or think!
Good. I believe that too.
You're wrong about that. God's name is YHVH (Yahavah), translated as Yahweh in the WEB:
Don't you know what the core foundation is upon which the new covenant stands? It addresses your main point!ME
in a bad position?
Those reading along know what's going on.
No problem.
And you want to proceed to the New Covenant?
I'm afraid you're not ready to discuss the New Covenant.
You'd have to know the 7 or 8 that came before that one first...
you'd have to know what they all have in common.
And I don't believe that you do.
You're also a rather dishonest person...
not becoming of one that claims to be Christian.
I don't like to converse with dishonest persons.
It's a simple and typical type question. Let me say it again in a different way.I'd say that's between me and God.
NOT between me and you.
Sorry to interrupt your discussion here, although you do bring up a key ad vital point concerning who is our true Creator.I'm not guessing, you express irrationality as clearly as you are able.
You say that twice though you fundamentally disagree with the truth of the words you claim agreement with by the doctrines you spread!
Your yahweh is a subdeity of the god el, the ancient canaanite deity. Your god was a well endowed bovine headed god of agriculture, livestock, and war, and it had a wife or mistress or something.
Your god's name has been inserted over mine because The Name was initially recorded without vowels. Your fill-in name is a slander and a travesty and a mockery of I Am. The closer you get to the Truth while still slandering, the guiltier you are.
I serve I Am, and I will exposit any plain and simple truth for which you provide opportunity by arguing with me from whatever text you can bring up in defense of your irrational assembly of words for which you have not sought lexical definitions in your attempt to use.
My God is the Word and you slander Him with your demeaning assumptions.
Something that came to me that blew my socks off:
"Before Abraham Was, I AM" (Jn.8:58)
I had never understood this but suddenly tonight I believe the meaning came to me. Why did Jesus say I AM? Why didn't he just say I was? I think the answer is that God inhabits eternity. He cannot say I was, or I will be as God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. He never changes. God is outside time!
In my experience, many in the churches are ahead of many on the internet. They haven't studied anywhere near as much. The result?Most of Christendom is ignorant of this information and then who is their real God. Do they care or should they care?
Only difference is, Jesus was "in the form of God" and "equal with God" (Phil 2:6) before He was begotten and born on earth. Were we? ...it would be blasphemous to think and teach so. And being found in the form of a man, He HUMBLED Himself....became subordinate to the Father as was fitting for one now found in the form of a man, setting an example of submission and obedience to God for all men.Plain words, people! Plain and simple words!
Was Paul alive before he was born? ... No!
But is he eternal? ... What Apostle wouldn't be?
But if eternal, then did he begin? ... Of course!
What is a Christian but one who follows Christ? And how do they do so but by His holy Life within them?
Jesus is the first-born of the resurrected, the first among the everlasting as a prototype for all men who would seek unity with the LORD in spirit and in truth.
Did Jesus exist before He was born? ... As surely as I did!
Was I alive before I was born? ... Only as an idea, as I had a child in mind before I begot him.
The Spirit of God is from eternal to eternal, but you would confuse the knitting of unblemished flesh and unblemished Spirit with some form of mysterious pre-existence nonsense?
If the questions don't make any more sense than the answers, you can tell the thing is not from the God of truth!
Wow, that is an evil accusation. Are we supposed to be striving about words? I don't think God is worried overmuch about how we spell His name, as long as it is HE who we worship by HIS Spirit dwelling in us.I'm not guessing, you express irrationality as clearly as you are able.
You say that twice though you fundamentally disagree with the truth of the words you claim agreement with by the doctrines you spread!
Your yahweh is a subdeity of the god el, the ancient canaanite deity. Your god was a well endowed bovine headed god of agriculture, livestock, and war, and it had a wife or mistress or something.
Your god's name has been inserted over mine because The Name was initially recorded without vowels. Your fill-in name is a slander and a travesty and a mockery of I Am. The closer you get to the Truth while still slandering, the guiltier you are.
I serve I Am, and I will exposit any plain and simple truth for which you provide opportunity by arguing with me from whatever text you can bring up in defense of your irrational assembly of words for which you have not sought lexical definitions in your attempt to use.
My God is the Word and you slander Him with your demeaning assumptions.
And then they really do not care about the character name called YHWH eitherIn my experience, many in the churches are ahead of many on the internet. They haven't studied anywhere near as much. The result?
In my over four decades of going to various denominational trinitarian churches, I would say at least half the people in them would only refer to the Father as God. And well over 90% of them would accept anyone as a christian who solely referred to Christ as the Son of God. And in my experience, this subject is only a big deal on the internet. And the people who have studied far less, tend to accept on the whole the biblical requirement of belief to receive salvation.
What have I written that is irrational? Be specific. For example, you wrote "you think the holy Spirit is a third person of a mysteriously three part god", so tell me where I wrote that. I'm 100% sure that I have not written anything in this thread (or any other thread) that implies that.I'm not guessing, you express irrationality as clearly as you are able.
Give me some examples. Don't just make accusations without giving some evidence.You say that twice though you fundamentally disagree with the truth of the words you claim agreement with by the doctrines you spread!
Nonsense! The Bible is the Word of God - 2 Timothy 3:16 KJVYour yahweh is a subdeity of the god el, the ancient canaanite deity. Your god was a well endowed bovine headed god of agriculture, livestock, and war, and it had a wife or mistress or something.
Watch those videos - they are the main sources that I learnt from on how to pronounce and write God's name.Your god's name has been inserted over mine because The Name was initially recorded without vowels. Your fill-in name is a slander and a travesty and a mockery of I Am. The closer you get to the Truth while still slandering, the guiltier you are.
More accusations and libel. You can't possibly know whether or not I have used lexicons, Bible commentaries or whatever to help me write my posts to this thread. Why are you being so nasty in your posts? You're lacking the spirit of Christ:I serve I Am, and I will exposit any plain and simple truth for which you provide opportunity by arguing with me from whatever text you can bring up in defense of your irrational assembly of words for which you have not sought lexical definitions in your attempt to use.
Again, what do you mean? Give examples.My God is the Word and you slander Him with your demeaning assumptions.
Again, what do you mean? Give examples.
The KJV and the UASV mean exactly the same.The English Bibles that we have are translations of the original writing's of God's Word. We can't fully trust all translations. Comparing different translations helps us to better understand the true meaning. For example, which is easier to understand - Genesis 25:29:
KJV
(29) And Jacob sod pottage: and Esau came from the field, and he was faint:or UASV
(29) Once when Jacob was cooking a stew, Esau came in from the field, and he was exhausted.
But they all state exactly the same Keithr...maybe in different words.And you accused me of "You read too many versions"!![]()
Could you please state what your point is?The Cambridge Bible Notes says:
This is the true God] It is impossible to determine with certainty whether ‘This’ (οὗτος) refers to the Father, the principal substantive of the previous sentence, or to Jesus Christ, the nearest substantive.
So we have to refer to other verses to determine what John meant, such as:
Jeremiah 10:10 WEB
(10) But Yahweh is the true God. He is the living God, and an everlasting King. At his wrath, the earth trembles. The nations aren’t able to withstand his indignation.1 John 5:11-13 WEB
(11) The testimony is this, that God gave to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.(12) He who has the Son has the life. He who doesn’t have God’s Son doesn’t have the life.(13) These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life, and that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God.1 John 1:1-3 WEB
(1) That which was from the beginning, that which we have heard, that which we have seen with our eyes, that which we saw, and our hands touched, concerning the Word of life(2) (and the life was revealed, and we have seen, and testify, and declare to you the life, the eternal life, which was with the Father, and was revealed to us);(3) that which we have seen and heard we declare to you, that you also may have fellowship with us. Yes, and our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son, Jesus Christ.
Problem here if you want to use Revelation to show that Jesus is not God.And John wrote Revelation 1:6 WEB
(6) and he {Jesus} made us to be a Kingdom, priests to his God and Father; to him be the glory and the dominion forever and ever. Amen.
So if the resurrected Jesus has a God then Jesus can't be the "true God". John understood that, so we can deduce that the "true God" that he was referring to in 1 John 5:20 was God, not Jesus. Remember that John also recorded Jesus praying to his Father, saying - John 17:3 WEB
(3) This is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and him whom you sent, Jesus Christ.
Jesus is the true God.
The LORD or Yahweh,
I have never done that.You promote irrationality from the foundation, that the Almighty may be rent into three.
No I don't. That's more lies from you.You pursue vain imaginations of a god whose wrath lasts forever, and then fear your own construct.
How do you know what I have done?You do not know the higher meanings of the words you use because you have not sought God directly, for who He is!
Yet more insults. You have still not shown me where, in which posts in this thread, I have written anything that matches your accusations.You gloss over words you don't know, you presume to know definitions that are wholly inaccurate, and you argue from your offendedness, not from the doctrines you preach.
What have I written that diminishes "the True God, the one Deuteronomy 32:4 describes"? Deuteronomy 32:4 KJV:I stand against your doctrines on the basis of how they diminish the True God, the one Deuteronomy 32:4 describes and Exodus 3:14 identifies by His Name.