Flat Earth Theory

[Psalm-147:3]

It's called celestial mechanics.
The lunar eclipses proves Earth is not flat.
God did that.

The royal astronomical society had documented more than 50 lunar eclipses since the 1500's where both sun & moon were simutaniously above the horizon.

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

No credit to God or Christianity because it can make new people think you have to be stupid to be a Christian.

Many who claim to be Christian are stupid.

Those are the tares Jesus spoke of.

I come from sciences, I studied it, so I was there.

Uh huh, making conclusions when all you have access to is what can be seen thru the senses based on the darkened mind of mankind and call it "science"

May the fleas of 1000 camels infest your crotch!!!

What are you a moslem?

1. It is not Holy
2 It is not a God

But it contains what the Holy God said.

God will be judging you by what He has said in His Book.
2 Thessalonians 2:10
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

Jesus said God's Word IS Truth
John 17:17
Sanctify them through Thy Truth: Thy word is Truth.

And Jesus had the Truth put in to written form.

Those that don't believe this are deceived by the devil and received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

Too bad for them!

The Protestantism is a relatively new religion based on a book.

The catholic cult is is old demonic opposition to God's Word that leads people to hell.

It is impossible for WATER to stick to a ball, let alone the Great Lakes and Oceans.

Only to those that false claim gravity is not real

the earth is a globe;

Yep.

It's amazing how some are so easily deceived by the devil on the most basic things

 

[Button]

The royal astronomical society had documented more than 50 lunar eclipses since the 1500's where both sun & moon were simutaniously above the horizon.

The Royal Astronomical Society has not stated the Earth is flat.

 

[Button]

You're asking someone who's not convinced what your question presupposes.

With worldly matters I come from a default position of skepticism, God's Word is my authority. NASA renditions of what they call Mars doesn't convince me. The moon is believed by some to be made of plasma, with stars said to sometimes be seen through it.

I respect the truth of my ignorance enough to consider the possibilities of these issues.

Your question is one that most people would side with. Despite your knowledge of mars being based on trust in what man-made 'space agencies' say. That is what I perceive a major weakness of your question to be.

The earth is not the moon, and it is not Mars. So if it is a different shape than these other objects, it is in accordance with logic. There is no inherent logical contradiction with it.

If Earth is flat, and the moon and Mars isn't, then it would be because God saw it fit to create it that way.

God doesn't tell us the Earth is flat.


I suggest anyone prone to the myth of flat Earth go so far as to purchase a high quality Telescope with planet,star,map software.

 

[Adventageous]

The physics of WATER is the science, 24/7, and it is the LAW of the LAND = by the CREATOR

Is "the physics of water" (which is different than "WATER = the science", as demonstrated in my previous response - Flat Earth Theory ) the only "science" "by the CREATOR" (sic; correction, Creators, plural, ie. see,

The Person / Being of the Father: Rev. 4:11; the Person / Being of the Son: Jhn. 1:13; Eph. 3:9; Col. 1:16; Heb. 1:3; 1 Jhn. 1:1-3; &c.; the Person / Being of the Holy Ghost / Spirit: Job 33:4; Psa. 104:30, and for 'Makers', see: “Elohiym” (Gen. 1:1 HOT, &c.) x (a lot) (true plural, 3 or greater form), & “us” x 4 (plural pronoun), “our” x 3 (plural pronoun): Gen. 1:26, 3:22, 11:7; Isa. 6:8; Jhn. 3:11; & “we” x 3 (plural pronoun): Jhn. 3:11; & “Creators” x 1 (Ecc. 12:1 HOT, “בוראיך”; plural pronoun, see also Job 33:4; Isa. 43:7; Rom. 11:36; 1 Cor. 8:6; Heb. 1:2, 2:10; Rev. 4:11), & “Makers” x 3 (Job 35:10 HOT, “עשׂי”) & (Psa. 149:2 HOT, “בעשׂיו”) & (Isa. 54:5 HOT, “עשׂיך”) (plural pronoun); & “Holy Ones” x 1 (Pro. 9:10 HOT, “קדשׁים”) (plural pronoun); &c; Verbs are sometimes plural in association with Elohiym:; as well as Gen. 20:13, “התעו” (wander) connected to Elohiym is plural; Gen. 35:7, “נגלו” (revealed) connected to Elohiym is plural; Deu. 4:7, “קרבים” (nigh) connected to Elohiym is plural; Jos. 24:19, “קדשׁים” (Holy) connected to Elohiym is plural; 2 Sam. 7:23, “הלכו” (went) connected to Elohiym is plural; Psa. 58:11, “שׁפטים” (judge) connected to Elohiym is plural; Pro. 30:3-4, “קדשׁים” (holy) connected to vs 4 with the “name” (of the Father), and that of “son’s name”. Even the word “Adonai” ([H136] “לאדני”, “Lord”) is given mostly / majority in the plural (Gen. 18:30; Exo. 34:23; Deu. 10:17; Jos. 3:11,13; Psa. 45:11; 114:7; 135:5; Mal. 1:6 HOT; &c.).),​

or are there also other sciences such as 'geology', which is the study of the "LAND" (sic), and the science of "atmospherics", which is one of the sciences invovled with the study of the 'air', and / or 'heaven'. What about the sciences of 'stellar dynamics', 'stellar cartography', 'planetary sciences', &c. and off-world type sciences?

Are they also "24/7" (sic)?

I would not agree with you that "the physics of WATER ... is the LAW of the LAND" (sic), since according to Gen. 1, "WATER" (sic) & "LAND" (sic) are are two differing created things. The earth is solid, and the waters are fluid, while the air is gaseous. I would say instead that the "physics of water are the laws of JEHOVAH Elohiym in matters of water". I am not attempting to be too strict here, as I basically understand what you mean, but if you are going to present an idea to others, then I might suggest your response be as clear as possible, to avoid as much confusion as possible. I am not against the proposal of your ideology, and not against the discussion of it, per se, but I would recommend you (and any) in presenting such ideas contrary to presently accepted paradigms to be as clear as possible.

Ok, now, would you be able to provide that definition of "level" you are using in regards "the physics of WATER"?

 

[Button]

Many who claim to be Christian are stupid.

Those are the tares Jesus spoke of.




Uh huh, making conclusions when all you have access to is what can be seen thru the senses based on the darkened mind of mankind and call it "science"




What are you a moslem?




But it contains what the Holy God said.

God will be judging you by what He has said in His Book.
2 Thessalonians 2:10
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

Jesus said God's Word IS Truth
John 17:17
Sanctify them through Thy Truth: Thy word is Truth.

And Jesus had the Truth put in to written form.

Those that don't believe this are deceived by the devil and received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

Too bad for them!




The catholic cult is is old demonic opposition to God's Word that leads people to hell.




Only to those that false claim gravity is not real

View attachment 77270



Yep.

It's amazing how some are so easily deceived by the devil on the most basic things

Curious. Are there really people who think gravity isn't real?

 

[Grailhunter]

Is "the physics of water" (which is different than "WATER = the science", as demonstrated in my previous response - Flat Earth Theory ) the only "science" "by the CREATOR" (sic; correction, Creators, plural, ie. see,

The Person / Being of the Father: Rev. 4:11; the Person / Being of the Son: Jhn. 1:13; Eph. 3:9; Col. 1:16; Heb. 1:3; 1 Jhn. 1:1-3; &c.; the Person / Being of the Holy Ghost / Spirit: Job 33:4; Psa. 104:30, and for 'Makers', see: “Elohiym” (Gen. 1:1 HOT, &c.) x (a lot) (true plural, 3 or greater form), & “us” x 4 (plural pronoun), “our” x 3 (plural pronoun): Gen. 1:26, 3:22, 11:7; Isa. 6:8; Jhn. 3:11; & “we” x 3 (plural pronoun): Jhn. 3:11; & “Creators” x 1 (Ecc. 12:1 HOT, “בוראיך”; plural pronoun, see also Job 33:4; Isa. 43:7; Rom. 11:36; 1 Cor. 8:6; Heb. 1:2, 2:10; Rev. 4:11), & “Makers” x 3 (Job 35:10 HOT, “עשׂי”) & (Psa. 149:2 HOT, “בעשׂיו”) & (Isa. 54:5 HOT, “עשׂיך”) (plural pronoun); & “Holy Ones” x 1 (Pro. 9:10 HOT, “קדשׁים”) (plural pronoun); &c; Verbs are sometimes plural in association with Elohiym:; as well as Gen. 20:13, “התעו” (wander) connected to Elohiym is plural; Gen. 35:7, “נגלו” (revealed) connected to Elohiym is plural; Deu. 4:7, “קרבים” (nigh) connected to Elohiym is plural; Jos. 24:19, “קדשׁים” (Holy) connected to Elohiym is plural; 2 Sam. 7:23, “הלכו” (went) connected to Elohiym is plural; Psa. 58:11, “שׁפטים” (judge) connected to Elohiym is plural; Pro. 30:3-4, “קדשׁים” (holy) connected to vs 4 with the “name” (of the Father), and that of “son’s name”. Even the word “Adonai” ([H136] “לאדני”, “Lord”) is given mostly / majority in the plural (Gen. 18:30; Exo. 34:23; Deu. 10:17; Jos. 3:11,13; Psa. 45:11; 114:7; 135:5; Mal. 1:6 HOT; &c.).),​

or are there also other sciences such as 'geology', which is the study of the "LAND" (sic), and the science of "atmospherics", which is one of the sciences invovled with the study of the 'air', and / or 'heaven'. What about the sciences of 'stellar dynamics', 'stellar cartography', 'planetary sciences', &c. and off-world type sciences?

Are they also "24/7" (sic)?

I would not agree with you that "the physics of WATER ... is the LAW of the LAND" (sic), since according to Gen. 1, "WATER" (sic) & "LAND" (sic) are are two differing created things. The earth is solid, and the waters are fluid, while the air is gaseous. I would say instead that the "physics of water are the laws of JEHOVAH Elohiym in matters of water". I am not attempting to be too strict here, as I basically understand what you mean, but if you are going to present an idea to others, then I might suggest your response be as clear as possible, to avoid as much confusion as possible. I am not against the proposal of your ideology, and not against the discussion of it, per se, but I would recommend you (and any) in presenting such ideas contrary to presently accepted paradigms to be as clear as possible.

Ok, now, would you be able to provide that definition of "level" you are using in regards "the physics of WATER"?

The physics of the hot dog shaped earth.......mustered for snow.

 

[Adventageous]

God doesn't tell us the Earth is flat.


I suggest anyone prone to the myth of flat Earth go so far as to purchase a high quality Telescope with planet,star,map software.

Well, I can tell you, or anyone for that matter, that I have travelled from California to Washington (State), to Arizona, to (and all the states inbetween the I80-I90 corridor) New York, to Hawaii, to American Samoa in the South Pacific. The starfields are differing in California, and in American Samoa. They are also slightly differing in the others as well.

 

[Adventageous]

The physics of the hot dog shaped earth.......mustered for snow.

I think you are living on this world - Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs - Wikipedia

:)

 

[Adventageous]

Curious. Are there really people who think gravity isn't real?

Well "gravity" is simply a word to describe a commonly observed phenomena, and there are differing definitions that some will use for it. I am not really of the Einsteinian group, but that is neither here nor there, as I acknowldge the effect of what is essentially called 'gravity'. Have you heard of the Birkeland Current Fillaments, and electrical universe? Not really discussing it here, but just curious.

 

[Button]

Well "gravity" is simply a word to describe a commonly observed phenomena, and there are differing definitions that some will use for it. I am not really of the Einsteinian group, but that is neither here nor there, as I acknowldge the effect of what is essentially called 'gravity'. Have you heard of the Birkeland Current Fillaments, and electrical universe? Not really discussing it here, but just curious.

Thought I've not studied the BirkelandCurrent Fillaments theory much at all, what I do see,though I may be wrong,is how it appears somewhat like the DNA helix.

I've also heard about the electrical universe theory.

 

[Adventageous]

View attachment 77312


Thought I've not studied the BirkelandCurrent Fillaments theory much at all, what I do see,though I may be wrong,is how it appears somewhat like the DNA helix.

I've also heard about the electrical universe theory.

I think that this topic might be for some good discussion in another thread at another time (not at present). I personally think that the 'E.U. model' has a lot of advantages over the standard Einsteinian one of 'space-time' (which I think is not overall accurate scripturally, or scientifically), but I do not want to engage in an off-topic here to diverge from addressing the claims / evidences of the 'F.E.' movement. Was just curious about how many (like yourself) have heard of it. Thank you for answering! :)

What I can say for certain is that 'gravity' is not 'buoyancy'.

 

[Adventageous]

...

Are you also on Discord?

 

[Button]

Are you also on Discord?

I don't know what that is so,no I am not.

 

[Adventageous]

I don't know what that is so,no I am not.

It's like a chat, forum, place to post, live conversate, listen to others, podcast, etc.

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discord.com

If you join, here is my invite link (you will need to click to join my server), no pressure, just offering. Join the Adventageous! Discord Server!

 

[Adventageous]

God doesn't tell us the Earth is flat.


I suggest anyone prone to the myth of flat Earth go so far as to purchase a high quality Telescope with planet,star,map software.

There are also very neat phone APs that are able to graphically image the stars above, with labelled names, etc, just by pointing camera at it, and some even work mathematically by calculated imaging through the earth on the other side (hemisphere). I do not own a phone, so do not ask me, but I have seen it on others phones.

 

[David in NJ]

Is "the physics of water" (which is different than "WATER = the science", as demonstrated in my previous response - Flat Earth Theory ) the only "science" "by the CREATOR" (sic; correction, Creators, plural, ie. see,

The Person / Being of the Father: Rev. 4:11; the Person / Being of the Son: Jhn. 1:13; Eph. 3:9; Col. 1:16; Heb. 1:3; 1 Jhn. 1:1-3; &c.; the Person / Being of the Holy Ghost / Spirit: Job 33:4; Psa. 104:30, and for 'Makers', see: “Elohiym” (Gen. 1:1 HOT, &c.) x (a lot) (true plural, 3 or greater form), & “us” x 4 (plural pronoun), “our” x 3 (plural pronoun): Gen. 1:26, 3:22, 11:7; Isa. 6:8; Jhn. 3:11; & “we” x 3 (plural pronoun): Jhn. 3:11; & “Creators” x 1 (Ecc. 12:1 HOT, “בוראיך”; plural pronoun, see also Job 33:4; Isa. 43:7; Rom. 11:36; 1 Cor. 8:6; Heb. 1:2, 2:10; Rev. 4:11), & “Makers” x 3 (Job 35:10 HOT, “עשׂי”) & (Psa. 149:2 HOT, “בעשׂיו”) & (Isa. 54:5 HOT, “עשׂיך”) (plural pronoun); & “Holy Ones” x 1 (Pro. 9:10 HOT, “קדשׁים”) (plural pronoun); &c; Verbs are sometimes plural in association with Elohiym:; as well as Gen. 20:13, “התעו” (wander) connected to Elohiym is plural; Gen. 35:7, “נגלו” (revealed) connected to Elohiym is plural; Deu. 4:7, “קרבים” (nigh) connected to Elohiym is plural; Jos. 24:19, “קדשׁים” (Holy) connected to Elohiym is plural; 2 Sam. 7:23, “הלכו” (went) connected to Elohiym is plural; Psa. 58:11, “שׁפטים” (judge) connected to Elohiym is plural; Pro. 30:3-4, “קדשׁים” (holy) connected to vs 4 with the “name” (of the Father), and that of “son’s name”. Even the word “Adonai” ([H136] “לאדני”, “Lord”) is given mostly / majority in the plural (Gen. 18:30; Exo. 34:23; Deu. 10:17; Jos. 3:11,13; Psa. 45:11; 114:7; 135:5; Mal. 1:6 HOT; &c.).),​

or are there also other sciences such as 'geology', which is the study of the "LAND" (sic), and the science of "atmospherics", which is one of the sciences invovled with the study of the 'air', and / or 'heaven'. What about the sciences of 'stellar dynamics', 'stellar cartography', 'planetary sciences', &c. and off-world type sciences?

Are they also "24/7" (sic)?

I would not agree with you that "the physics of WATER ... is the LAW of the LAND" (sic), since according to Gen. 1, "WATER" (sic) & "LAND" (sic) are are two differing created things. The earth is solid, and the waters are fluid, while the air is gaseous. I would say instead that the "physics of water are the laws of JEHOVAH Elohiym in matters of water". I am not attempting to be too strict here, as I basically understand what you mean, but if you are going to present an idea to others, then I might suggest your response be as clear as possible, to avoid as much confusion as possible. I am not against the proposal of your ideology, and not against the discussion of it, per se, but I would recommend you (and any) in presenting such ideas contrary to presently accepted paradigms to be as clear as possible.

Ok, now, would you be able to provide that definition of "level" you are using in regards "the physics of WATER"?

WATER is the physics that demonstrate, CLEAR as DAY, that we are not on a ball spinning at 1,000mph
and
Good Morning = the sun travels across the sky for the earth does not move

 

[David in NJ]

Many who claim to be Christian are stupid.

Those are the tares Jesus spoke of.




Uh huh, making conclusions when all you have access to is what can be seen thru the senses based on the darkened mind of mankind and call it "science"




What are you a moslem?




But it contains what the Holy God said.

God will be judging you by what He has said in His Book.
2 Thessalonians 2:10
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

Jesus said God's Word IS Truth
John 17:17
Sanctify them through Thy Truth: Thy word is Truth.

And Jesus had the Truth put in to written form.

Those that don't believe this are deceived by the devil and received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

Too bad for them!




The catholic cult is is old demonic opposition to God's Word that leads people to hell.




Only to those that false claim gravity is not real

View attachment 77270



Yep.

It's amazing how some are so easily deceived by the devil on the most basic things

Be careful of using the word 'stupid' and to whom you apply it to!

Especially when you place your trust in those who serve Satan, the god of this age.

God Created WATER for Life and for your understanding, which you currently mock!

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

Curious. Are there really people who think gravity isn't real?

Apparently.

That yankee from New Jersey was claiming if the world was round then the ocean water would float way

He's not only been deceived in to thinking the earth is not a globe but also thinks gravity isn't real.

 

[David in NJ]

Apparently.

That yankee from New Jersey was claiming if the world was round then the ocean water would float way

He's not only been deceived in to thinking the earth is not a globe but also thinks gravity isn't real.

Only ignorant people mock God's words.

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap."