Lambano
Well-Known Member
- Jul 13, 2021
- 10,242
- 12,980
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God anticipated the Fall with a plan for redemption.How so?
Then why doesn't God eliminate the treacherous Satan, instead letting humans endure suffering?God anticipated the Fall with a plan for redemption.
The Logos/logic/reason/plan.
It's part of the Logos, the plan.Then why doesn't God eliminate the treacherous Satan, instead letting humans endure suffering?
I know there may be many reasons, but I don’t think choosing a simple method is a mistake. However, the fact that God chose the most difficult path to carry out His plan seems exaggerated to me... Did He not trust that the human He created were good?It's part of the Logos, the plan.
Food by the sweat of our brow. Thorns and thistles.
When will this end? Not until the judgment.
Only in the new order off hings will the curse be broken.
Were they good?Did He not trust that the human He created were good?
I think God loves a good story.Then why doesn't God eliminate the treacherous Satan, instead letting humans endure suffering?
If no Satan the serpent, they were good. And all will be good. Just as the Revelation tells us.Were they good?
We have failed miserably.
Few humans have shown themselves to be good at all.
In my view, God is not saving humanity, but rather one of His creations—Satan. However, the ending is not a good story. Satan remains unsaved, irredeemably wrong...I think God loves a good story.
What are the necessary elements?
A villain, a hero, a victim, ???
Will we be not rescued in the end?
You don't believe that humankind created in God 's image will be saved?In my view, God is not saving humanity, but rather one of His creations—Satan. However, the ending is not a good story. Satan remains unsaved, irredeemably wrong...
It's not that I haven't seen God saving humanity. I just saw more in it.You don't believe that humankind created in God 's image will be saved?
What is the point?
In the end all things will be reconciled. (full circle)It's not that I haven't seen God saving humanity. I just saw more in it.
If God didn't intend to save Satan, why did God keep him around all along? Was it because they were going to celebrate New Year's and Christmas together?
I hadn't thought much of this in the past, but it sure is strange.The story of the Fall of humankind in Genesis chapter three begs a few questions.
Actually, starting in Genesis chapter two with the consequences stated to Adam.
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it:
for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." - Genesis 2:17 KJV
Seems pretty straight forward. In the day you eat thereof you will surely die. Dead.
Adam had no questions about this, but what did it mean to him? Did he understand death?
And even more confusing is what happened when he ate thereof. In that day he did not die.
Not physically anyway.
And where did all the other consequences come from? Not part of the original deal.
- For Eve: You will have great pain in childbirth. Your husband will rule over you.
- For Adam: You will eat by the sweat of your brow. Thistles and thorns.
- For the Serpent: On your belly you will go, eating dust.
- For A&E: Banished from the garden.
None of these consequences were in the original warning given to Adam.
Which Adam passed on to his wife Eve, adding the bit about not touching.
Since the Fall is all goofed up, do we also misunderstand the consequences for us?And on top of all of these inconsistencies we have the Fall of humankind.
All we who were born in Adam's race were born sinners in need of redemption.
That much seems clear. Unless you question whether Adam was the first man.
Then things really get confusing.
Well, that's my point. I don't know that Adam did witness death. Didn't death come with the Fall? And not before?
Personally, I think the evenings and mornings are a literary device. If taken literally, you then have to explain how you can have evenings and mornings without the sun.What do you make of this?
Genesis 1:5 NIV
God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
The Judge can choose to adjust the sentence after the crime has been committed. And God will always tend to go in the direction of mercy.Why? That was not clear in the consequences given. "In the day that you eat thereof..."
They still had a free choice whether or not to obey God. There were two of them - Adam had the opportunity to stand up for God and didn't take it. And the 'bait' that was dangled in front of them was to be 'gods' themselves - alternative sources of authority. If that isn't rebellion against the authority of God, what is?Rebelled?
He and Eve were deceived. They had no plans to eat thereof.
The given reason for reproduction is to fill the earth and subdue it. Humans had long lifespans. What about the animals?Death of human beings came after the Fall.
I'm pretty sure that death of plants and other animals predated the Fall - because Genesis 1 makes a big issue out of reproduction, and if there's no death then you don't need to reproduce.
Good point, but...Personally, I think the evenings and mornings are a literary device. If taken literally, you then have to explain how you can have evenings and mornings without the sun.
I'm not a legal expert, but what I see is an extraordinary difference in the consequences.The Judge can choose to adjust the sentence after the crime has been committed. And God will always tend to go in the direction of mercy.
Again, I question the ability of A&E to understand the long term consequences of the act.They still had a free choice whether or not to obey God. There were two of them - Adam had the opportunity to stand up for God and didn't take it. And the 'bait' that was dangled in front of them was to be 'gods' themselves - alternative sources of authority. If that isn't rebellion against the authority of God, what is?
There was another consequence that we haven't yet discussed.Again, I question the ability of A&E to understand the long term consequences of the act.
Especially since the consequences were not given in detail and they had no comparisons to gauge such things.
Some good points for discussion here.....I question the ability of A&E to understand the long term consequences of the act.
Especially since the consequences were not given in detail and they had no comparisons to gauge such things
Who told the humans that they were naked? They did....with a knowledge of evil, they could now see an evil aspect to everything in their lives....the very thing God had tried to keep from them....he never wanted evil to touch them, but as an equal opposite of good, it existed as a natural balance that is seen in all of God’s creation.Adam said he hid because he was naked. God asked, "Who told you that you were naked?"
Who indeed? At the end of Genesis chapter two A&E were naked and unashamed.
So, where did the shame of nakedness come from? Who told them that they were shamefully naked?
II question whether Adam knew what death was.Did they know what death was?
If they told themselves that they were naked they would not have been naked and unashamed at the end of chapter two of Genesis.Who told the humans that they were naked? They did....with a knowledge of evil, they could now see an evil aspect to everything in their lives....the very thing God had tried to keep from them....he never wanted evil to touch them, but as an equal opposite of good, it existed as a natural balance that is seen in all of God’s creation.
Again you ignore the very nature of the warning....death was understood by Adam, because he had witnessed it in nature. If death was the penalty, what does anything else matter...? As far as they knew, it could have occurred at any moment.II question whether Adam knew what death was.
Reminds me of a child that we tell to not run out into traffic lest they die.
The sternness of our voice says more than our words.
At some point they will see road kill and better understand.
But the cautionary warning probably comes before any awareness of what death is.
Read ch 2 again....it’s a condensed version of ch 1.....the creation of Eve closes chapter 2....the fall had not yet taken place...there is no shame because the knowledge of evil has not yet been unleashed.St. SteVen said:
Adam said he hid because he was naked. God asked, "Who told you that you were naked?"
Who indeed? At the end of Genesis chapter two A&E were naked and unashamed.
So, where did the shame of nakedness come from? Who told them that they were shamefully naked?
If they told themselves that they were naked they would not have been naked and unashamed at the end of chapter two of Genesis.
Well, it says that they sewed fig leaves together to cover their reproductive parts.....the feeling of shame was something they had not experienced before....we can only imagine what thought were now running through their minds......a knowledge of evil, invaded their thought processes, exposed the potential for it everywhere. This is what God wanted to protect them from ever experiencing....and obedience would have done that for them and all their children.....forever.As son as Adam told God he was naked, the culprit was eluded to. "Who told you that you were naked? Did you eat... ?"
Who indeed. After eating we see the first couple scurrying around as if they were out of their minds. Because they were.
Their minds were flooded with shaming thoughts and confusion. IMHO