Posts like this show how effective propaganda is by the PRISON INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. While the death penalty is more than 99.9% cheaper than holding someone in prison for 50 years as the OP stated, you're adamant that it is not true, confusing the NATURAL with the MANMADE. Consider this bit of Scripture
Numbers 15:32-36
32 One day while the people of Israel were in the wilderness, they discovered a man gathering wood on the Sabbath day. 33 The people who found him doing this took him before Moses, Aaron, and the rest of the community. 34 They held him in custody because they did not know what to do with him. 35 Then the LORD said to Moses, “The man must be put to death! The whole community must stone him outside the camp.” 36 So the whole community took the man outside the camp and stoned him to death, just as the LORD had commanded Moses.
I suspect "the whole community" is not the 600,000 men freed from captivity in Egypt.
Although the text is not specific, it suggests the man sentenced to death was only held in custody for a very short time, minutes, if not hours. And these ancient men did not even incur the cost of death weapons as the LORD provided NATURAL.
Odd that the all-knowing God did not realize this death penalty was more of a financial burden to the fledgling Hebrews than holding him for decades. It's odd that the Hebrews did not appeal on account of the cost isn't it? Or does
@marks want to be cute again playing with the meaning of cost?
- Did they carry out this work on the Sabbath? (Where there was no out of work cost)
- Were they working on the Sabbath or did they take time out of their busy work day to do the LORD's work?
- When you multiply non-productive time, lost wages in taking "the whole community" outside the camp, there is a cost to that.
- Yet, cost was not considered as a factor in the decision-making per the text. Maybe non-financial cost was all that mattered, DO JUSTICE and obey the LORD your God?
My, how times have changed.