Would you go to your brothers 2nd wedding after he commited adultery?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Would you go to your brothers 2nd wedding after he commited adultery?


  • Total voters
    12

PS95

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2024
2,717
1,828
113
Eastern Shore
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Greetings...
Like I said I cannot blame the KJV on this one.
That is why a Theologian has to know the scriptures and a little history.
The only time you will see the word divorce in the New Testament scriptures is in the four Gospels because it pertains to the Jews and Mosaic Law. When you read the discussion in the Gospels on divorce you have to keep it context. It is a discussion among Jews about divorce and the Mosaic Law and we do not know how many wives these Jews had.
Christianity did not adopt the letter of divorcement...
Like I said the scriptures refer to breaking up as put away or leaving. No religious or civil case and neither is good. But the rules for men and women in these instances are different.
From there Christian history and civil history changed things.
Protestant made a church wedding a requirement to be married and as history moved along it became a civil contract. So now divorce is a court case.
I know you've talked about this before. I think that divorce is a translation. It means what it means.
Jesus certainly attended a wedding celebration.
- The woman at the well had many husbands according to Jesus but the last was not her husband- Jesus knew they were not married.
I don't know why you seem to oppose weddings?- its just making it official before God ( for some) and a celebration. I know of no one enforcing a church wedding now.
I don't really see the point of talking about it again.
Sorry.
 

Armour of God

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2026
895
569
93
47
Adelaide
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Well no we should not intentionally cause division, but we are to separate ourselves from the world.

I suppose this would be a matter of attending the wedding rubs at your conscience or not. It is a personal choice to attend or not to. But, I wonder, are they Christians? Either way, it is a heart matter I would think.

God bless your decision! And, I hope you can settle it in your own heart.

Well for me the question is just hypothetical but I would have to attend. It's not a sin to attend and I think that not attending is being too prideful. Pride is Satans favourite sin, it pulls people away from God and away from their loved ones.
Destroying a relationship simply because you want to prove a point just isn't worth it. We have all sinned so it would also be hypocritical not to attend because of their sin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy

soberxp

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2025
2,631
907
113
43
Xi'an
m.youtube.com
Faith
Christian
Country
China
Gender
Male
The first thing to do is to find his brother's ex-wife and seek her forgiveness. There is no simpler way to do this than this.

Screenshot_2026-04-04-13-35-30-380_com.phoenix.read-edit.jpg
 

Wick Stick

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2023
2,424
1,486
113
46
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
and again all you get from it is it prohibits fornication and incest?
side note- I never noticed incest in those passages- maybe you assumed, he was sleeping with his mother / father's wife. I assumed father's wife not necessarily his actual mother.
I get much more out of it- Paul specifically prohibits believers from associating with someone who claims to be a Christian but who is..
.here ya once more- This is the point I have been trying to make-
I understand your point. Actually, I approve. The chapter has that. The point is valid.

It isn't clear that it applies to the case in the opening post.
10 I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world. 11But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13But those who are outside, God judges. REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES.

then we get the question--- well, how many times did he cheat on his wife etc etc blah blah
which is why I listed the divorce verses.
The scriptures are very clear about divorce and how God hates it- and that divorced persons should not be looking to remarry.
Instead be reconciled.. or remain alone. Marriage is very holy to God. We don't have that view these days.
Let's make it personal. I'm divorced. My (ex)wife cheated on me. I hold no guilt over divorcing her. She wanted the divorce. I agreed to it; it was mutual.

Biblically, she should have been stoned to death. That isn't what I wanted. Divorce is a mercy, here, compared to the Biblical standard.

Do I feel bad about this? Not at all. Do I think I should have sought a reconciliation? HELL NO. To do so would have been the absolute pinnacle of disrespect to myself.

I am NOT unbiased in this regard. Reconciliation is NOT the best option in every case. There's a reason Jesus gives unfaithfulness as an exception. I believe and RELY on that exception.
In our century - we think we are more sophisticated than that now. So many are divorcing that to us- it's the norm. that doesn't make it right. It doesn't make it suddenly scriptural.
No. I don't think I'm second-guessing God on this. I think I'm relying on exactly what He said.
Then we hear of abusive spouses- yes that is horrible and they should be safe - and depart- but not to remarry.
If the Bible prescribes a stoning, but modern law doesn't permit it... I'll let you fill in the blanks
I don't see where it says if the divorce isn't your fault that you are free to remarry. Only death does that.
I never said it seemed fair. I am just the messenger! It says what it says.
I don't think it needs to say that. It only needs to NOT prohibit that. That was my original point.
Your mileage may vary, and I know full well that many here don't agree but it isn't me they aren't agreeing with.
God still calls it adultery to remarry if your spouse is alive.
I don't agree. The exception is explicit in Scripture.
Due to the hardness of our hearts so we don't have people killing each other to marry another- should we now allow divorces like Moses? Seems we do.
It does not mean that God approves. I can't find it written anywhere...
Was Moses wrong? I don't think he was. Is it ideal? Nope. Is real life ideal? Nope.
Of course there is a difference. It was a video and we only know so much.. that's why I wrote that I would have to speak with him more to understand him better. Nothing in the video indicated any repentance. I am more than willing to be fair minded and merciful. We all need that.

Yeah I think everyone took it how they took it. That's why I asked the OP poster later- who said just a sibling.. I think we all took it to mean different things. I think the pastor in the video took it as a believer.
That's fair. I don't see it quite the way you do... but that's based on... information NOT given.
How is that even legal? I know in my state it isn't.
The bible does speak to having elders one wife etc. It is not the topic, but it's in there. Also speaks about widows being married once. It's there. I see no polygamy in the NT. none.
No? The idea that an elder has only one wife necessitates the idea that some people have more than one. But I imply... it's isn't explicitly stated.
That's clearly against God's command to love your wife as Christ loves the church.

Who knows? He may have cheated on her and left her for the mistress. Sounds plausible.

Agree. But since we don't know if he even attempted to make things right- we can't say.

I made no assumptions. I wrote that I would have to speak with him and discuss the pertinent scriptures in order to understand where he is. Getting married is no real indicator of anything. People marry and divorce constantly.

Wanna bet?!!!
Yeah, I'll take the bet. I think you made some assumptions. I did too. They weren't the same.
hmm It's relevant in my mind- that's the point- marrying isn't an indicator of a thing inside a person. Axe murderers marry. Many marry for wrong reasons.
My issue with the whole thing is simple. Too many in the church today seem to let sin just roll off their backs- their own or others- hey we are all sinners is the motto! Yes we are- stay humble but don't allow sin. The scriptures tell a very different story. Sin is serious before coming to Christ, and is expected to be far less for those in Christ who are being transformed into His likeness- by the Spirit given to us- we are to put deeds of the flesh to death. We are to be holy and we are to live in a righteous way of life.
Life is rarely simple. When others who are... important fixtures in your life... deal treacherously... what then? The simplicity thhat comes from acting in righteousness is undermined by their unrighteousness. How then do you act righteously? The answer is not easy
Ok well I think this convo has teetered out.. we all took the video differently and it wasn't much to go on.
Agreed. There wasn't enough information given.
 

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
14,204
6,181
113
69
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I know you've talked about this before. I think that divorce is a translation. It means what it means.
Jesus certainly attended a wedding celebration.
- The woman at the well had many husbands according to Jesus but the last was not her husband- Jesus knew they were not married.
I don't know why you seem to oppose weddings?- its just making it official before God ( for some) and a celebration. I know of no one enforcing a church wedding now.
I don't really see the point of talking about it again.
Sorry.

Ya....see what I mean....LOL
The scriptures call it the marriage in Cana and no wedding ceremony described. The storyline picks up at what we would call the reception. There are a lot of questions about that event.
I am a Theologian, it does not matter what I like or dislike it matters about what the scriptures and history actually tell us.. Just the facts Maam.
But just for the record, I love weddings! I have never missed one that I have been invited to.
 

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
37,025
60,720
113
54
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
False beliefs have unbelievable power and cause harm.
Actually the scriptures never say you have to have a wedding ceremony to be married. For thousands of years people coupled up to be married and could not be married until they coupled up---sex.--- For the Jews it was the bridal chamber. Even today if you do not have sex after a wedding ceremony they can get the marriage annulled.
Up to the 17th century wedding ceremonies were voluntary and originate from the Pagans. Modern wedding ceremonies still have Pagan rituals embedded them. The Gentiles brought wedding ceremonies into Christianity.
In the 17th century the Protestants made church weddings a requirement to be married. Which I think is a good thing.

This topic goes deep.....Two people that are living together are not living in sin.....they are married.
Casual sex is a sin but it gets worse because if they have sex with someone else it is adultery.

Another false belief is that divorce is a process in Christianity. It is not. The topic of divorce in the Gospels was between Yeshua --- a Jew, with other Jews, about the Mosaic Law which permitted a letter of divorce. No letter of divorce in Christianity. And there was no telling how many wives those Jews had.....Polygamy.

The topic of divorce---put away---gets complicated. Polygamy was never stopped by the scriptures, so it gets a little sexist for our times. Technically and man can still have more than one wife and a woman can leave her husband but cannot remarry. If that fair? I do not thinks so.

As a custom Christianity mostly ended this a few centuries ago and I agree. But it is still kind of a sticky wicket.
If a man sneaks around and has sex with another woman we call that adultery.
But if he told her he was taking another wife....that would not be adultery....but against the law in most states and against our Christian customs. But is it a sin?

To address your story....Very few people get married before having sex first. If they do, they are married and have a ceremony to celebrate the marriage. And anytime there is a divorce there is usually two sides to the story. A lot of reasons for divorce but it usually occurs between two good people that fell out of love for one reason or the other. Why not get a divorce first before having sex with another woman? A lot of reasons for that too.

I am kind of a hard liner on this, in the old days they killed people for committing adultery. Today I think they should get prison time.

Ya so I would say go to his wedding.....just punch him in the nose first.
Jesus turned the water into wine at a certain ceremony . Long before the seventeenth century too .
As far certain t hings you wrote there are some truths in it . But lets not get too far carried away my friend .
 

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
37,025
60,720
113
54
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
and jacob had a certain ceremony performed himself .
so lets not get too far carried away .
 

Wick Stick

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2023
2,424
1,486
113
46
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
and jacob had a certain ceremony performed himself .
so lets not get too far carried away .
English Bibles sometimes translate as "marriage" where the original language just means "feast." It's not exactly wrong, but it's imprecise.

Every wedding is a feast. But not every feast is a wedding.
 

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
14,204
6,181
113
69
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Jesus turned the water into wine at a certain ceremony . Long before the seventeenth century too .
As far certain t hings you wrote there are some truths in it . But lets not get too far carried away my friend .

I have been telling you guys that you have to watch these translations they slip in these little beliefs they have.
Water into wine at the.....reception.
The scriptures call it the marriage in Cana, not a wedding and no wedding ceremony described. The storyline picks up at what we would call the reception. There are a lot of questions about that event.
 
Last edited:

Hillsage

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2023
702
483
63
77
Western Kansas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Tagging The grandfather of a "bastard" child.

@Lambano thank you for being one of two who (assuming) actually read the above big post. But it never even received ONE post in response, in the last 2 months. So, I'm curious as to why you have even 'tagged me'?
 

Jesussaves150

Member
Nov 11, 2025
109
88
28
59
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
What if he confessed his sins to God will his family still hold him accountable turning their back on him.How does he gain forgiveness from his family?Do we hold peoples sins against them their entire life.Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

Are you saying once you sin that's it its all over hell awaits you.There is no forgiveness.

Jesus forgave the woman in the gospel why can't this man be forgiven?
 
Last edited:

Dan Clarkston

Well-Known Member
Dec 16, 2023
3,363
1,224
113
56
Denver Colorado
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What if he confessed his sins to God will his family still hold him accountable turning their back on him.How does he gain forgiveness from his family?Do we hold peoples sins against them their entire life.Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

Are you saying once you sin that's it its all over hell awaits you.There is no forgiveness.

Jesus forgave the woman in the gospel why can't this man be forgiven?

In addition to confessing one's sins, we also need to stop the sin.
If we continue in our sin then we did not repent and are living as sinners

If one dies in that condition then they won't be in attendance at the marriage Supper of the Lamb.
So yes the Lord will forgive a person if they confess AND forsake their sin and only then does He have mercy on them.

They will need to stop sowing to the flesh (reaping corruption) and start sowing to the Spirit (reaping life) - Gal 6:7,8

Proverbs 28:13
He that covereth his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy.

1 John 1:9
If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

Now the false teachers will see this post and will chime in claiming "we can live in sin and still be saved, it's all good man" which is what the greasy grace people always say
 

PS95

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2024
2,717
1,828
113
Eastern Shore
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ok I never noticed that verse and I'm still pondering it. I don't think Jesus is telling us to intentionally cause division with our families
You're right- No, Jesus isn't saying to divide families on purpose, BUT He is saying that families will be divided OVER HIM.
I can tell you firsthand that when I became a Christian- my entire JW family shunned me. Why? Because I worship Jesus and His Father. They refuse to worship the Son of God because they say he is a created angel.
Also, the Jews disowned family when they came to Christ. Many still do that, to this day. Look at Muslim families- same. Hindus- same.
What they divide over is JESUS.
But what about the verses I mentioned that basically tells us not to judge because we have also sinned.
We aren't to point out the sins of another if we too walk in our own sins. That is being a hypocrite. Believers are washed and made clean- and sin does not have dominion over their lives anyway- it shouldn't! If it does and sin still rules your way of life- that's a problem. If you are sitting at home masturbating to porn- you should not be pointing out your brother who is a fornicator. Jesus- said to judge with righteous judgment. Approaching a brother or sister about sin should never be done in a "I gotcha" kind of way- but after prayer and in love for that person- seeking only what is good for him/her in the Lord. Please read these below-

“Stop judging by mere appearances, but instead judge correctly.” – John 7:24

Matt 7
1“Do not judge so that you will not be judged. 2“For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. 3“Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 4“Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ and behold, the log is in your own eye? 5You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.
6“Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.

Romans 2:1
You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on another. For on whatever grounds you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?” – 1 Corinthians 5:12

Galatians 6:1
Brothers, if someone is caught in a trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him with a spirit of gentleness. But watch yourself, or you also may be tempted.

Matt 18-
15“If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother. 16“But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that BY THE MOUTH OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES EVERY FACT MAY BE CONFIRMED. 17“If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. 18“Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.

1 Corinthians 5

9 I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; 10I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world. 11But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13But those who are outside, God judges. REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES.

And ultimately I'm wondering would I be committing a sin for attending that wedding. I don't think so

I am not going to say its a sin to go. But if this is a brother in Christ who is unrepentant- how if he acting any different from the man sleeping with his father's wife who will not repent? Paul said not to associate with them and to remove them from the church.
A little leaven spoils the whole lump. Do we ignore what Paul said about it? is Paul disagreeing with the Lord? NO!
see 1 Cor 5 above-


When Christians all turn a blind eye to sins we are no longer walking in love. We are to help each other to overcome sins not to ignore sins.
How are different from the world when we ignore sin? It appears as if we approve. We don't- do we? Then the church is overcome with alcoholics, adultery, fornication, and so forth.. Nowhere is that ok'd! WE ONCE WERE those things-- but we have been washed and are to walk in newness of life now. Read Romans 6

1 Cor 6
9Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 11Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.

This is NOT about arrogance or judging- it is about lovingly approaching someone in sin and trying to win him back.
We are called to be holy. The church is not a place to bring our sins and still walk in them without repentance. Jesus accepts us in our sins- repenting of them- and He washes us- forgives us- we are not to continue in them. We are to put to death the deeds of the flesh by the Spirit which God gives us all. Ro 6
The love of this world- the lust of the eyes, lust of the flesh, and the pride of life is not of God. 1 john-

Of course if you beat your wife- you need to get that fixed before you go and try to tell your brother how he needs to stop letting his dog pee on your flowerbed.
That is what Jesus was saying- don't be a hypocrite.
When we ignore sins of our fellow believers- does our "humility" help the church? Of course not- First clean up your own yard before you look at your neighbors. Love mercy- seek forgiveness and offer it- walk humbly, but that does not mean IGNORE SIN. Kill sin by the Spirit and help your brother to do the same. If he refuses you- see the scriptures- matt 18

The guy in the video- we just don't have enough info! Is he a brother or a sibling- a believer or no? It matters. Repented? Attempted reconciliation? We don't know.


1 Corinthians 5
9 I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; 10I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world. 11But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13But those who are outside, God judges. REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES.

Is Paul saying that he and the church had no sins? NO. He is speaking to unrepentant sinning.
 

PS95

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2024
2,717
1,828
113
Eastern Shore
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Jesus clearly says that divorcing, except for sexual immorality, and remarriage is a sin

Nothing you say changes that.
That's all I have to say about that.
We're getting off topic.
Your VIDEO---The answers if we had known which he was- should have been the same IMO. see what you think.
here's why-
According to Scripture-
1. Brother is an unbelieving sibling--- Sure go to the wedding. He doesn't know the Lord, so why expect him to behave as if he does? Plant seeds and pray for him.
2. Brother says he is a Christian
- Talk to him about it if you do' not already know.
Has he repented and sought her forgiveness for his adultery? Did he ever try to reconcile with his wife? Use the scriptures and speak in love.
If those answers are both NO--
don't go.
WHY? He is unrepentant and loving and walking in his sin, and he knows better. How is he any different from the man sleeping with his father's wife who wont repent?
The act of marrying another doesn't forgive the sin.

-If he says- he made a terrible mistake and has asked for her forgiveness and the Lord's, but she refused him and wanted a divorce.. and he now wants to make his error honorable by marrying his mistress-
That's different- we are free to go if we want to.

3. Sibling who is a believer- Same as #2

Instead- what we got on here is a lot of - "we are all sinners- so what"..
While some may feel that way, and I do understand-- it is not scriptural at all.
It is how a little leaven ferments the whole lump works.

Hence, my point. Either we obey God - or we do it our own way.
Picking and choosing passages isn't what we should do. Agree?
Am I saying its a sin to go if he is not repentant? Idk Why you would want to celebrate his unrepentant sin? That does him no good either. How is that love? look how humble and loving I am - I eat with sinners?
No. Jesus ate with sinners to bring them to Himself- not to justify the sins of those who say they know Him but disobey what He said.

Let this sink in. I once was also confused about "judging"- you are not condemning anyone to hell- you are seeking to help them walk with the Lord in love.
- it will become clearer! Hope it helps!
 

PS95

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2024
2,717
1,828
113
Eastern Shore
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ya....see what I mean....LOL
The scriptures call it the marriage in Cana and no wedding ceremony described. The storyline picks up at what we would call the reception. There are a lot of questions about that event.
I am a Theologian, it does not matter what I like or dislike it matters about what the scriptures and history actually tell us.. Just the facts Maam.
But just for the record, I love weddings! I have never missed one that I have been invited to.
GH- with respect to your education- the scriptures speak of a marriage celebration- YES. why would you assume there was no ceremony? Even if there were no vows like we exchange or flowers etc- there was something that caused them to be now "married" .
Clearly- again- look at the woman at the well- How did Jesus discern between her many "husbands" and the BF now who was NOT her "husband?"
SOMETHING had to take place to make them husband and wife vs not being her husband
It clearly was not sex.
I have no idea what your actual point is as a theologian...
 

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
14,204
6,181
113
69
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
GH- with respect to your education- the scriptures speak of a marriage celebration- YES. why would you assume there was no ceremony? Even if there were no vows like we exchange or flowers etc- there was something that caused them to be now "married" .
Clearly- again- look at the woman at the well- How did Jesus discern between her many "husbands" and the BF now who was NOT her "husband?"
SOMETHING had to take place to make them husband and wife vs not being her husband
It clearly was not sex.
I have no idea what your actual point is as a theologian...

I am not saying that people did not celebrate marriages, but the scriptures do not indicate a requirement for a celebration or a ceremony. And assuming a religion is a bad way to understand the scriptures. No matter what they celebrated they were not married until they had sex. For the Jews the celebration included the bridal chamber where the couple united during the celebration and the mother would go in and collect the sheets to prove her daughter's virginity.

The woman at the well---Did she have several husbands at one time or several one at a time? And something happened to be married? Clearly not sex? Way too much assuming. Ya see, people that have beliefs and go to the scriptures and try to superimpose their beliefs over and above the scriptures and assume anything they want will never understand the truth of the scriptures.

Take the scriptures for what they say and quit assuming and adding to them.

Again, the scriptures never say there was a requirement for a wedding celebration or ceremony to be married. Marriage Ceremonies come from Pagan cultures. When it is said a man "took a wife" it meant it. The Gentiles brought Marriage Ceremonies into Christianity and they were voluntary. This is why modern Marriage Ceremonies have several Pagan rituals imbedded in them. AND I am not saying that there is anything wrong with that.

(This topic took a week to cover in college, so there is a lot more to the story. The Jews and Jewish-Christians considered these ceremonies Pagan.)

Now after Paul converted the Pagans I am sure there were a lot of Marriage Ceremonies but historically the first documented Christian Marriage Ceremony occurred in the 7th century. But still this was all voluntary until the Protestants made church Wedding Ceremonies a requirement to be married. And up to that point the Catholic Church would not allow weddings in their churches.....But soon after followed the Protestant's lead.
 
Last edited:

Wick Stick

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2023
2,424
1,486
113
46
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
GH- with respect to your education- the scriptures speak of a marriage celebration- YES. why would you assume there was no ceremony? Even if there were no vows like we exchange or flowers etc- there was something that caused them to be now "married" .
There was a marriage contract, typically arranged between the groom and the bride's father. The groom brought a party of friends and family to the woman's house. A bride price was paid.

Then there was a feast, with music, dancing, etc. You might call it the 'reception' but it was the middle part of a 1st century wedding.

At the end of the feast, there was consummation. The groom de-flowered his new bride in a booth or tent specifically made for this purpose. Afterwards, the bridal sheets were displayed publicly - the blood-stains proving the new wife's virtue
Clearly- again- look at the woman at the well- How did Jesus discern between her many "husbands" and the BF now who was NOT her "husband?"
SOMETHING had to take place to make them husband and wife vs not being her husband
It clearly was not sex.
Sex clearly was part of the wedding.

The woman at the well presumably lacked the legal aspect of the marriage. Her non-husband had no covenant with her father.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PS95

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
37,025
60,720
113
54
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I have been telling you guys that you have to watch these translations they slip in these little beliefs they have.
Water into wine at the.....reception.
The scriptures call it the marriage in Cana, not a wedding and no wedding ceremony described. The storyline picks up at what we would call the reception. There are a lot of questions about that event.
trivia question time . let us test our faith .
I have heard it said by more and more within the christain realm
we can attend a gay marriage , we can attend an adulterous remarriage .
That in fact we ought to show our l ove and not offend .
But . IS allowing ONE to SIN and to enter into SIN good in the eyes of GOD .
And the answer is NO .
YE shall not hate your neighbor in your heart , you shall CORRECT HIM and NOT ALLOW sin upon HIM .
And who here thinks GOD IS FINE WITH ADULTERY or with same sex marriage .
IF SO , you is following the wrong god .
SO if one does go , just remember
THERE is a good reason why the question is asked
IF ANYONE HERE has CAUSE for why these two ought not to b e married , LET HIM SPEAK or forever hold his peace .
WELL lets see , I THINK ADULTERY and or SAME SEX is CAUSE FOR ONE NOT TO BE MARRIED .
But hey i am just a man , SO lets again ask ourselves , WHAT DO WE THINK GOD THINKS ABOUT IT .
NOPE . SO my advice to those who always try and make me seem as the hater
for saying we ought not to do so . that if you family memebers or any one in said church
is going to head RIGHT INTO a sin , warn one . And if they get upset , AT LEAST you did what was right
and DO NOT GO to that marriage . But if one does , YA BETTER b e ready to stand and GIVE THE GOOD
and HOLY RIGHTEOUS CAUSE OF GOD for why THESE TWO Ought NOT to be married .
And its probably a whole lot easier to just NOT HAVE GONE IN THE FIRST PLACE . but hey folks that one is up to you all .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvelloustime

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
14,204
6,181
113
69
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
trivia question time . let us test our faith .
I have heard it said by more and more within the christain realm
we can attend a gay marriage , we can attend an adulterous remarriage .
That in fact we ought to show our l ove and not offend .
But . IS allowing ONE to SIN and to enter into SIN good in the eyes of GOD .
And the answer is NO .
YE shall not hate your neighbor in your heart , you shall CORRECT HIM and NOT ALLOW sin upon HIM .
And who here thinks GOD IS FINE WITH ADULTERY or with same sex marriage .
IF SO , you is following the wrong god .
SO if one does go , just remember
THERE is a good reason why the question is asked
IF ANYONE HERE has CAUSE for why these two ought not to b e married , LET HIM SPEAK or forever hold his peace .
WELL lets see , I THINK ADULTERY and or SAME SEX is CAUSE FOR ONE NOT TO BE MARRIED .
But hey i am just a man , SO lets again ask ourselves , WHAT DO WE THINK GOD THINKS ABOUT IT .
NOPE . SO my advice to those who always try and make me seem as the hater
for saying we ought not to do so . that if you family memebers or any one in said church
is going to head RIGHT INTO a sin , warn one . And if they get upset , AT LEAST you did what was right
and DO NOT GO to that marriage . But if one does , YA BETTER b e ready to stand and GIVE THE GOOD
and HOLY RIGHTEOUS CAUSE OF GOD for why THESE TWO Ought NOT to be married .
And its probably a whole lot easier to just NOT HAVE GONE IN THE FIRST PLACE . but hey folks that one is up to you all .

Forgiveness is the foundation of Christianity, without it we are all in the crapper.
So punch him in the nose and go to the wedding.
Self rightiousness is a sin too.