A Biblical Lesson on Spiritual Discernment

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,771
986
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Says the guy who continues to not address my points. Very hypocritical of you. But not unexpected.

Interesting. You keep insisting I haven't addressed your points, yet your "points" consist mostly of assertions about me rather than biblical refutations of my position.

If I've missed something, then quote the specific passage of Scripture that disproves what I wrote in my original post. So far, you've offered plenty of opinions about my character but very little exegesis.

It's easy to say, "You're wrong." It's much harder to open the Bible and demonstrate it. That's the part that still seems to be missing.

When you're ready to refute my position from Scripture instead of from personal opinion, I'll gladly engage. Until then, repeatedly declaring yourself right isn't the same as proving it. lfh
 

IndianaRob

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2023
1,961
717
113
55
Louisville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Interesting. You keep insisting I haven't addressed your points, yet your "points" consist mostly of assertions about me rather than biblical refutations of my position.

If I've missed something, then quote the specific passage of Scripture that disproves what I wrote in my original post. So far, you've offered plenty of opinions about my character but very little exegesis.

It's easy to say, "You're wrong." It's much harder to open the Bible and demonstrate it. That's the part that still seems to be missing.

When you're ready to refute my position from Scripture instead of from personal opinion, I'll gladly engage. Until then, repeatedly declaring yourself right isn't the same as proving it. lfh
You’re position can’t be refuted. In the context of the verse, literal stones don’t fit.
 
  • Love
Reactions: TribulationSigns

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,708
7,148
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Interesting. You keep insisting I haven't addressed your points, yet your "points" consist mostly of assertions about me rather than biblical refutations of my position.

If I've missed something, then quote the specific passage of Scripture that disproves what I wrote in my original post. So far, you've offered plenty of opinions about my character but very little exegesis.

It's easy to say, "You're wrong." It's much harder to open the Bible and demonstrate it. That's the part that still seems to be missing.

When you're ready to refute my position from Scripture instead of from personal opinion, I'll gladly engage. Until then, repeatedly declaring yourself right isn't the same as proving it. lfh
We have discussed this in depth before when you have not addressed my arguments. You have done NOTHING to prove that Jesus was not talking about earthly Jerusalem the destruction of the temple buildings standing at that time in passages like Luke 19:41-44, Luke 21:6-7, Luke 21:20-24, Matthew 22:2-7, Matthew 24:1-2, Matthew 24:15-21, Mark 13:1-2 and Mark 13:14-20. All of those passages are clearly referring to the destruction of the temple buildings and the destruction of unbelieving Jews and that occurred in 70 AD just as Jesus prophesied. I guess it's just a coincidence to you that it all happened just as He said it would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,708
7,148
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Luk 19:40 And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.
I haven't said anything about that verse. He claims that the following passage did not occur in 70 AD...

Luke 19:41 Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, 42 saying, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes. 43 For days will come upon you when your enemies will build an embankment around you, surround you and close you in on every side, 44 and level you, and your children within you, to the ground; and they will not leave in you one stone upon another, because you did not know the time of your visitation.”

This describes exactly what happened in 70 AD. The Roman armies surrounded the city and then killed most of the Jews within the city and they destroyed the temple buildings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,771
986
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You’re position can’t be refuted. In the context of the verse, literal stones don’t fit.

Indeed. For many years, I also assumed Jesus was referring to literal stones that He could miraculously make cry out. But after comparing Scripture with Scripture, I came to see that Christ was painting a much deeper spiritual picture.

Throughout the Bible, stones carry rich covenantal and spiritual significance. When we allow Scripture to interpret Scripture, the imagery becomes much clearer. That is the kind of spiritual discernment the Holy Spirit gives—not inventing symbolism, but recognizing the biblical patterns and fulfillment that God Himself has woven throughout His Word.

Ironically, some people like SI, etc. have accused me of being "Gnostic" or of "spiritualizing everything." That accusation completely misses my position! I am not denying physical reality or inventing hidden meanings. I am simply allowing the New Testament to interpret the symbolism that God Himself uses throughout Scripture.

The real question is this: after Christ revealed the true Temple, the true Israel, the true sacrifice, the true circumcision, and the true priesthood in Himself, why insist that His reference to "stones" must be limited to lifeless rocks while ignoring the consistent biblical imagery of living stones and God's spiritual house? That is the issue that still has not been answered from Scripture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rwb and IndianaRob

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,771
986
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I haven't said anything about that verse. He claims that the following passage did not occur in 70 AD...

True! These passage has NOTHING to do with your precious false 70AD doctrine because this is not what Christ talked about at all! Read the verse carefully:

Luke 19:41 Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, 42 saying, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes. 43 For days will come upon you when your enemies will build an embankment around you, surround you and close you in on every side, 44 and level you, and your children within you, to the ground; and they will not leave in you one stone upon another, because you did not know the time of your visitation.”

This describes exactly what happened in 70 AD. The Roman armies surrounded the city and then killed most of the Jews within the city and they destroyed the temple buildings.

Here you go again with false assumption.. and lack of spiritual discernment!

You're assuming the prophecy is exhausted by the events of 70 AD, but that's the very point under debate—you haven't demonstrated it from the text!

Notice that Jesus doesn't merely speak of buildings. He says:

"They will level you, and your children within you, to the ground."

The "stones" are mentioned alongside the "children within you" as part of one covenantal judgment. The prophecy is NOT merely about architecture; it is about God's judgment upon the covenant people who rejected their Messiah.

This fits the broader teaching of Christ. He declared Himself to be the true Temple (John 2:19–21). He identified His people as the true household of God - his stones! He took the kingdom from the unbelieving Old Testament covenant Israel and gave it to "a nation producing its fruits" (Matthew 21:43). The New Testament describes Christ's people as living stones being built into a spiritual house (1 Peter 2:5). In the same way, the physical temple, its stones, and its buildings under the Old Covenant represented God's covenant congregation. They were never an end in themselves but served as visible shadows pointing to the greater spiritual reality fulfilled in Christ and His people. They did fell at the Cross in order for the New Temple being rebuild...in three days. Not 70AD.

The transition, therefore, is not from one pile of literal stones to another, but from the Old Covenant congregation represented by a physical temple to the New Covenant congregation built of living stones with Christ Himself as the chief Cornerstone.

The question, then, is why you stop at literal masonry when the New Testament consistently moves from the shadow to the fulfillment.

Yes, history records that Jerusalem was destroyed. I don't deny that. What I deny is that Christ's words should be reduced to a prediction about fallen literal building stones. The judgment is covenantal. The physical imagery points to God's judgment upon the Old Covenant congregation that rejected His visitation, while Christ gathers and rebuild the temple with living stones.

I think your doctrine is internally inconsistent. You treat the prophecy as if the true temple was somehow rebuilt from the literal rubble of Jerusalem's stones in 70 AD. Yet Christ said, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."

Where is the three-day rebuilding in your 70 AD interpretation?

The New Testament answers that question plainly: Christ was speaking of the temple of His body (John 2:19–21). The true Temple was raised three days after His crucifixion—not decades later.

Your interpretation bypasses Christ's own explanation and replaces it with a timeline that cannot satisfy His own prophecy.

You're reading the prophecy backward—starting with 70 AD and making the text fit that event. I'm starting with Christ and the New Testament's own interpretation of spiritual temple, stones, and God's dwelling place.

@IndianaRob

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rwb

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
16,619
4,827
113
71
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The way I have seen here lately, there's no point in posting the contradictions I see because they already have explanations for all of them, and they won't be persuaded. Why? Because they lack spiritual discernment!

Sad, but that is "generally" true. What's that old expression?

"When you're a Hammer, everything looks like a nail!"

The point is to examine the item first to see if it really is a nail, because perhaps it is just the pattern of a nail. Here is the patience of the saints. Here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus to defer to the "authority" of the word of God to define terms. Whether stones, trees, a city, a temple, a tabernacle, the promised land, bread, wine, or anything else, it's not always as it seems. God defines His own terms. As Christ Himself so ably illustrated in the Healing/Restoration of the Blind man spoken of in the book of Mark. While he was blind, men appeared ὁράω or [horao], as trees. That is to say, until that man was healed by Christ, and it was then that He said that the trees were actually men. Where once he was blind and saw mysterious imagery, now he saw the truth of what they were. Selah!

Mark 8:23-25
  • "And he took the blind man by the hand, and led him out of the town; and when he had spit on his eyes, and put his hands upon him, he asked him if he saw ought.
  • And he looked up, and said, I see men as trees, walking.
  • After that he put his hands again upon his eyes, and made him look up: and he was restored, and saw every man clearly."

This is a whole Spiritual lesson in itself! To be blind is to be in spiritual darkness where you cannot see things as they actually are. They are seen as a mystery/secret. But once we are healed by Christ, our spiritual eyes are opened, and we can understand that the tree is actually a man. ...as in Revelation chapter 7 again. For example:

Revelation 7:3
  • "Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads."
God is not speaking about saving the physical earth, the sea, and the trees "until" all his servants are saved. It "appears" that way, but the truth is, the imagery in this context is of the world/creation. God is saying this judgment cannot come upon the people of the world (earth, sea, trees) that they are hurt UNTIL after He has saved His People from out of this world. For example, God is long-suffering, not willing that any of His elect are lost. Those who receive the seal become His people. The earth, sea, and trees represent the unsaved of the world (remember, a tree is known by its fruits?). The earth and sea, clearly represent the people of the world who are not spiritually healed. That's why they cannot be hurt until God patiently restores every single elect who is to be saved first. His servants must be sealed first before the loosening of the beast and the Great Tribulation. In other words, a great apostasy, a falling away from the faith is going to take place upon the world, but not until all Israel (the 144,000) are sealed FIRST! This is the mystery of God to reveal secrets to many, and blind others, as is His divine good Sovereign will.

...all that to say, not everyone is going to understand that the stones of the city and Temple represent people. These things are spiritually discerned. We can but pray for their understanding. However, whether they do or not see is all according to the will of God.

And when they don't, they fall back on the "it's a paradox" to explain how it is not actually true.

Well, indoctrination is a strong thing. Or others will play the dueling Scriptures game as if that will make your scripture null and void. Do they really think all God is interested in is the physical stones of a building falling down? Is a falling building the judgment that God speaks of concerning Israel? Is our Lord's interest in having them see their physical Temple fall, or is it in having them see their own fall? To have them (and us) consider God's Word "carefully" and understand what's really important is not physical--not meat and drink? It's what meat and drink represent!!

Luke 19:43-44
  • "For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,
  • And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation."
Did God discuss with a literal/physical City? Who are the city's children in this context? Right there we should understand the judgment of the city falling and being laid even with the ground, are the people! I mean, if we're being honest with ourselves, which is difficult to do when you are indoctrinated. A little spittle on the eyes and we can see this clearly! In this context, it is perfectly clear Christ is talking about the city representing the congregation, and it's children as the stones laid even with the ground. It's the people of his Old Covenant congregation and not the physical stones of a literal Jerusalem. The judgment is on the people as the spiritual city representing the house of the Lord, not the literal Jerusalem. He will lay the people even with the ground "as if" they were literal stones, not every literal stone in 70 AD as the misguided proponents of Josephus imagine! It's the "imagery" of total destruction in the fall of Israel at the cross. Not 70 AD, at the cross! And its restoration in the Resurrection of Christ. Just as with the Temple:

John 2:19-21
  • "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
  • Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
  • But he spake of the temple of his body."
The Romans did NOT destroy the Temple of prophecy; the people of Israel did! The Jewish people asked for a "Sign" that Christ had authority to cast out these buyers and sellers out of the Temple, and Christ replied, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up!" That was the Sign, but as the people of the congregation today, the people of the congregation then missed it; because they were so busy looking toward the literal Temple rather than the one God actually had in view. Selah. And Christ rebuilt it, stone upon stone, through His resurrection. Selah.

Romans 11:11
  • "I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy."
That's how the Old Testament representative congregation Israel fell, and this is how it was restored in the New Testament or Covenant with Israel representation; the church. As I said before, both the Temple and the city represented the Lord's congregation.

Luke 13:34-35
  • "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not!
  • Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord."
Can a Physical/literal city kill the prophets, can it stone those sent to it? ...or is the Lord Jesus Christ speaking to a congregation, to a spiritual city? The people's house was left desolate because they didn't know the time of their visitation, and rejected their Messiah. May we pray that God will show mercy and give many the wisdom to discern THE TRUTH of His Most Holy Word instead of being decevied with 70 AD nonsense! More example on the next post...

@rwb
You have used learing spiritual applications to denounce the literalness of the word of God.
1. Teh man was totally blind
2. Jesus spit on his eyes and blurred sight was restored.
3. Jesus laid hands and his sight was fully restored.

And yes the earth and sea will be devestated by God just as He inspired it to be written.

Teh more "wiser" we seek to become. the more the word fails us. It was written for those who trust God at His Word and not seek new spiritual revelations.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,708
7,148
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
True! These passage has NOTHING to do with your precious false 70AD doctrine because this is not what Christ talked about at all!
LOL! Yes, things happened in Jerusalem in 70 AD just as Jesus prophesied, but that was just a coincidence, right?

Here you go again with false assumption.. and lack of spiritual discernment!

You're assuming the prophecy is exhausted by the events of 70 AD, but that's the very point under debate—you haven't demonstrated it from the text!
What is there to demonstrate? Why do you make simple things convoluted? Jesus said that Jerusalem would be surrounded and that the people in the city would be killed and that the temple buildings would be destroyed. That's exactly what happened in 70 AD. Don't make this more complicated than it is because of your desire to spiritualize the entire Bible.

Notice that Jesus doesn't merely speak of buildings. He says:

"They will level you, and your children within you, to the ground."
Yes, exactly. And most of the people within the city were killed with the rest being taken captive. What is hard to understand about this?

The "stones" are mentioned alongside the "children within you" as part of one covenantal judgment.
LOL. The stones are the stones of physical structures like the temple buildings, as you can see from what He said later about the destruction of the physical temple buildings later.

The prophecy is NOT merely about architecture; it is about God's judgment upon the covenant people who rejected their Messiah.
Of course it is! Hello? But, that involved physical destruction in their city of Jerusalem, also. The temple buildings were destroyed just as Jesus said they would be. Very simple.

This fits the broader teaching of Christ. He declared Himself to be the true Temple (John 2:19–21).
This has nothing to do with the Olivet Discourse! Nowhere does He talk about His body as the true temple in the Olivet Discourse. You're trying two relate to completely unrelated things, which is what people lacking in spiritual discernment do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WPM and covenantee

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,873
3,499
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
True! These passage has NOTHING to do with your precious false 70AD doctrine because this is not what Christ talked about at all! Read the verse carefully:



Here you go again with false assumption.. and lack of spiritual discernment!

You're assuming the prophecy is exhausted by the events of 70 AD, but that's the very point under debate—you haven't demonstrated it from the text!

Notice that Jesus doesn't merely speak of buildings. He says:

"They will level you, and your children within you, to the ground."

The "stones" are mentioned alongside the "children within you" as part of one covenantal judgment. The prophecy is NOT merely about architecture; it is about God's judgment upon the covenant people who rejected their Messiah.

This fits the broader teaching of Christ. He declared Himself to be the true Temple (John 2:19–21). He identified His people as the true household of God - his stones! He took the kingdom from the unbelieving Old Testament covenant Israel and gave it to "a nation producing its fruits" (Matthew 21:43). The New Testament describes Christ's people as living stones being built into a spiritual house (1 Peter 2:5). In the same way, the physical temple, its stones, and its buildings under the Old Covenant represented God's covenant congregation. They were never an end in themselves but served as visible shadows pointing to the greater spiritual reality fulfilled in Christ and His people. They did fell at the Cross in order for the New Temple being rebuild...in three days. Not 70AD.

The transition, therefore, is not from one pile of literal stones to another, but from the Old Covenant congregation represented by a physical temple to the New Covenant congregation built of living stones with Christ Himself as the chief Cornerstone.

The question, then, is why you stop at literal masonry when the New Testament consistently moves from the shadow to the fulfillment.

Yes, history records that Jerusalem was destroyed. I don't deny that. What I deny is that Christ's words should be reduced to a prediction about fallen literal building stones. The judgment is covenantal. The physical imagery points to God's judgment upon the Old Covenant congregation that rejected His visitation, while Christ gathers and rebuild the temple with living stones.

I think your doctrine is internally inconsistent. You treat the prophecy as if the true temple was somehow rebuilt from the literal rubble of Jerusalem's stones in 70 AD. Yet Christ said, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."

Where is the three-day rebuilding in your 70 AD interpretation?

The New Testament answers that question plainly: Christ was speaking of the temple of His body (John 2:19–21). The true Temple was raised three days after His crucifixion—not decades later.

Your interpretation bypasses Christ's own explanation and replaces it with a timeline that cannot satisfy His own prophecy.

You're reading the prophecy backward—starting with 70 AD and making the text fit that event. I'm starting with Christ and the New Testament's own interpretation of spiritual temple, stones, and God's dwelling place.

@IndianaRob

Your "spiritually discerned" interpretation of Matthew 21:12. Agreed?

Matthew 21:12
And Jesus went into the body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the body, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiritual Israelite

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,934
2,541
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Your "spiritually discerned" interpretation of Matthew 21:12. Agreed?

Matthew 21:12
And Jesus went into the body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the body, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

You must differentiate between the physical temple of Old Covenant Israel and the spiritual Temple of the New Covenant that is both the body and church of Christ. Why did Christ say the physical temple would be destroyed but be speaking of the temple as His body?

Matthew 21:12 (KJV) And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

Joh 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
Joh 2:20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
Joh 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,708
7,148
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You must differentiate between the physical temple of Old Covenant Israel and the spiritual Temple of the New Covenant that is both the body and church of Christ. Why did Christ say the physical temple would be destroyed but be speaking of the temple as His body?

Matthew 21:12 (KJV) And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

Joh 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
Joh 2:20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
Joh 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
No one denies the reality of Jesus being the temple in that passage, but this has no relation whatsoever to the Olivet Discourse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
11,189
5,989
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You must differentiate between the physical temple of Old Covenant Israel and the spiritual Temple of the New Covenant that is both the body and church of Christ. Why did Christ say the physical temple would be destroyed but be speaking of the temple as His body?

Matthew 21:12 (KJV) And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

Joh 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
Joh 2:20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
Joh 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
Matthew 24:1-2 records, “And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

Was Christ literally and specifically speaking here of the physical "buildings of the temple” or not?
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,708
7,148
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Matthew 24:1-2 records, “And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

Was Christ literally and specifically speaking here of the physical "buildings of the temple” or not?
He clearly was, but we'll see how he answers the question. In case Jesus's reference to "all these things" isn't clear to Him, the following makes it clear as to what Jesus was talking about...

Mark 13:1 Then as He went out of the temple, one of His disciples said to Him, “Teacher, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here!” 2 And Jesus answered and said to him, “Do you see these great buildings? Not one stone shall be left upon another, that shall not be thrown down.”

He was clearly referring to the same temple buildings that the disciples were marveling at and asking Him to look at, which were the physical temple buildings standing at that time. This shouldn't even be debatable. It's not, as far as I'm concerned.
 

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
11,189
5,989
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
He clearly was, but we'll see how he answers the question. In case Jesus's reference to "all these things" isn't clear to Him, the following makes it clear as to what Jesus was talking about...

Mark 13:1 Then as He went out of the temple, one of His disciples said to Him, “Teacher, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here!” 2 And Jesus answered and said to him, “Do you see these great buildings? Not one stone shall be left upon another, that shall not be thrown down.”

He was clearly referring to the same temple buildings that the disciples were marveling at and asking Him to look at, which were the physical temple buildings standing at that time. This shouldn't even be debatable. It's not, as far as I'm concerned.
Exactly. This is pure Gnosticism. Nothing is literal or real. It is all imaginary.
 

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,771
986
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
LOL! Yes, things happened in Jerusalem in 70 AD just as Jesus prophesied, but that was just a coincidence, right?

LOL! No, it was not a coincidence. However, fulfillment of a prophecy does not automatically mean the fulfillment is exhausted by the physical event. Many Old Testament prophecies had an immediate historical fulfillment while also pointing to a greater fulfillment in Christ, don't you realize this??

For example, the exodus was a real historical event, yet the New Testament applies it spiritually to believers (1 Corinthians 10:1–4). The flood was a real physical judgment, yet Peter says it also prefigured baptism (1 Peter 3:20–21).

The question is not whether 70 AD happened. The question is whether you are limiting Christ's words to the shadow while ignoring the substance.

Selah!
What is there to demonstrate? Why do you make simple things convoluted? Jesus said that Jerusalem would be surrounded and that the people in the city would be killed and that the temple buildings would be destroyed. That's exactly what happened in 70 AD. Don't make this more complicated than it is because of your desire to spiritualize the entire Bible. Yes, exactly. And most of the people within the city were killed with the rest being taken captive. What is hard to understand about this?

You are focusing only on the physical details while ignoring the covenantal language Christ used.

Jesus said:

"If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes." (Luke 19:42)
Why were their eyes hidden? Because they rejected their Messiah.

The judgment was not merely about buildings. It was judgment upon the covenant people who rejected the Son of God.

Jesus had already warned:

"The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it." (Matthew 21:43)
That is covenant judgment—not merely a construction disaster. :laughing:



LOL. The stones are the stones of physical structures like the temple buildings, as you can see from what He said later about the destruction of the physical temple buildings later.

Your interpretation ignores how Scripture uses the imagery of stones.

Christ Himself is called:

"The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone." (Matthew 21:42)

Believers are called:

"living stones being built up as a spiritual house." (1 Peter 2:5)

The question is why you insist the stones must only mean dead stones in a building when Scripture itself reveals that God's true temple is His people in Christ.

Jesus said:

"Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." (John 2:19)

John explains:

"He was speaking about the temple of His body." (John 2:21)

The true Temple is not Herod's building. It is Christ and His people.

You are seeing this truth is because you are spiritually blind. In other words, lack of spiritual discernment of what Christ actually talked about.

Of course it is! Hello? But, that involved physical destruction in their city of Jerusalem, also. The temple buildings were destroyed just as Jesus said they would be. Very simple.

Simple? Say a natural man! It does not always mean complete.

The disciples saw the physical temple, but Christ redirected their understanding toward greater realities. The entire New Testament moves from physical shadows to spiritual fulfillment.

Hebrews says:

"The law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities." (Hebrews 10:1)

The earthly temple was a shadow. Christ is the reality. Selah!

This has nothing to do with the Olivet Discourse! Nowhere does He talk about His body as the true temple in the Olivet Discourse. You're trying two relate to completely unrelated things, which is what people lacking in spiritual discernment do.

That weak argument of yours misunderstand how Scripture interprets Scripture.

Jesus did not need to repeat every truth every time He spoke. The apostles interpreted Christ's words through the full revelation of Scripture.

When Christ spoke about the temple, His disciples were "still" thought in earthly terms. But Christ had already revealed the true meaning of the temple.

The Samaritan woman thought worship was tied to a physical location, remember?

"Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, but you say that in Jerusalem is the place where people ought to worship." (John 4:20)

Jesus answered:

"The hour is coming when neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father." (John 4:21)

Christ moved worship away from physical Jerusalem to worship "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23–24).

Your repeated argument is: "A physical event happened, therefore the prophecy can only be physical!."

But Scripture does NOT reason that way. The apostles constantly showed that physical realities pointed beyond themselves to Christ.

The real question is not whether Jerusalem fell. It did.

The real question is whether you are seeing only the stones that fell, or whether you recognize the greater judgment and fulfillment revealed through Christ—the transition from the Old Covenant shadow to the New Covenant reality built upon Christ, the Cornerstone, and His people, the living stones.

Selah!