We need context here. God is allowing people to have access to His kingdom realm. All have access. But many are called and few chosen. One must bear the fruits of repentance from dead works. That's why the Jews lost their "exclusivity" as the people of God. They became proud and smug (just like believers today), so they lost their place. Hence the general need of repentance...toward all religious people, and all sinners. (the righteous are already repentant). We are all being called into AT LEAST righteousness.
This call to a general repentance has nothing to do with God's mercy towards the meek, the poor, the fatherless, the widow...etc.
We all have access to the coming glory....that is the race of faith...and with it comes salvation from sin. But I think people confuse salvation with acceptance with God. God has ALWAYS accepted the righteous...as Peter and others attest.
Jesus' ministry was to call sinners to repentance INTO righteousness and obedience, just like the ones who already were guiltless. Remember that Jesus leaves behind the 99 sheep who are well in order to seek out the one that strayed. So He came to call SINNERS to repentance.
There are many other such nuances that a surface reading can't pick up on. One example is that Love covers a multitude of sins. What KIND of sins??? The bible says (Peshaim) carnal sins...like those committed by harlots and publicans. How can God be so merciful? Well, to confound the religious self-righteous ones who look down on the love among sinners. ...who look down on the meek as having no value.
But God sees value where religious pretenders do not. Why throw away your own salvation for the "privilige" of looking down on others??
Tweaking??? You mean compromise? Holiness has no compromise in it. Mercy on the other hand overlooks many kinds of sins....but not iniquity which the religious ones perpetuate by their naming and claiming. Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord against hypocrisy, I warn people.
That's right. All the verses that people use to negate righteousness among non-believers actually point to a miraculous heavenly walk...which the condemners of the righteous are NOT walking in. So these are condemned as being neither holy nor righteous. I warn people and get hated for it...but I'm trying to save their souls. Like a fish caught on dry land trying to avoid every helping hand as Sting puts it. So people don't know what's good for them.
A brother asked me yesterday what I thought of Watchman Nee. I said he was a great brother but he compromises with positional theology in order to be accepted by more people...because people want to FEEL special before God...even if ultimately that is the WORST thing they can do as it negates the fear and trembling required to actually enter the kingdom of God. And he agreed with me.
The question is not whether holiness, obedience, repentance, mercy, and the fear of God matter. Scripture plainly teaches that they do. The question is whether people who do not have the Son are already righteous and accepted by God apart from salvation through Jesus Christ.
Scripture does not teach that.
Cornelius is actually a direct refutation of that idea. Cornelius feared God, prayed, gave alms, and had a good reputation. Yet the angel told him to send for Peter, who “shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved” (Acts 11:14).
Cornelius was religious, sincere, charitable, and responsive to the light God had given him, but he still needed to hear and believe the gospel to be saved. That is why Peter preached Christ to him:
“Through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins” (Acts 10:43).
Acts 10:35 says that in every nation the person who fears God and works righteousness “is accepted with him.” It does not mean that such a person is already justified, possesses eternal life, or has salvation without Christ. The context proves otherwise. God was showing Peter that He does not reject Gentiles because they are Gentiles. He receives people from every nation, but they must still hear and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ.
There is no biblical category of righteous unbelievers who are accepted by God while lacking the Son. Scripture says:
“There is none righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10).
“He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life” (1 John 5:12).
“No man cometh unto the Father, but by me” (John 14:6).
“To him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness” (Romans 4:5).
Jesus did not come merely to move sinners into the same natural righteousness supposedly already possessed by certain unbelievers. He came to save the lost, forgive sins, reconcile sinners to God, and give eternal life to those who believe in Him.
The ninety-nine sheep in Luke 15 do not establish ninety-nine guiltless people who have no need of Christ. The context begins with the Pharisees and scribes complaining that Jesus received sinners. Jesus answered their self-righteous attitude by speaking of “ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance” (Luke 15:7). Scripture has already established that no one is naturally righteous. Jesus was exposing people who considered themselves righteous and saw no need to repent.
Nor does Galatians 2:20 teach that a Christian becomes incapable of sin because Christ lives in him. Christ living in the believer produces holiness and obedience, but John still wrote to believers:
“If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (1 John 1:8).
There is also no passage teaching that the Red Sea is one Christian baptism and the Jordan River is a second baptism that elevates certain believers into sinless perfection. That is an imposed spiritual system, not an interpretation given by Scripture. The same is true of using the early and latter rain, Old Testament sacrifices, or the highway of holiness to construct multiple levels of salvation.
Quoting respected Christian writers does not establish the doctrine either. Their writings must be tested by Scripture just as every other teaching must be tested.
The gospel is not shallow acknowledgment, smug self-confidence, or permission to live in sin. True faith produces obedience and holiness. But our acceptance with God is not based upon our attaining a superior spiritual condition. Believers are “accepted in the beloved” (Ephesians 1:6), meaning accepted through Jesus Christ.
This teaching does not merely add “nuance” to the gospel. It changes the gospel by giving righteousness, acceptance, and a form of life to people who do not have the Son, while turning salvation through Christ into access to a higher spiritual realm. Scripture says the opposite: “He that hath not the Son of God hath not life.”