Conversation with An Atheist

[Mancunian]

He would ask you and you wouldn’t tell him.

I'm not a soil type, if my doctor asked me which soil type I belong to, I would recommend that he might need antipsychotics.

 

[Matthias]

I'm not a soil type, …

You are in the great physician's parable.

, if my doctor asked me which soil type I belong to, I would recommend that he might need antipsychotics.

 

[Mancunian]

It was your scenario, not mine.

Ask me about my brain, that was what was being referred to, in a round about way.
Is my brain receptive? Not what soil type I am.

 

[Matthias]

Ask me about my brain, …

The soil types in the parable are linked to your brain, to everyone’s brain.

You aren’t receptive to Jesus’ teaching. You know it. I know it. Jesus knows it.

… that was what was being referred to, in a round about way.
Is my brain receptive? Not what soil type I am.

 

[Mancunian]

Yes I know.

 

[Mancunian]

So ask me if my brain is receptive.

 

[Matthias]

Yes I know.

Then we are in agreement on the matter.

 

[Mancunian]

You still haven't told me about what you think your roll we be in the eternal government.

I haven't forgotten, even with all this soil around my brain.

 

[Mancunian]

Why would there be a need for eternal government?

 

[Mancunian]

Who would you be keeping in line?

 

[Matthias]

You still haven't told me about what you think your roll we be in the eternal government.

All the details I have about it are contained in the Bible which you say you’ve read and are re-reading.

I haven't forgotten, even with all this soil around my brain.

If you haven’t forgotten then you‘re asking about something that you remember. That brings us back to your agenda -> For what reason are you asking me?

 

[Mancunian]

All the details I have about it are contained in the Bible which you say you’ve read and are re-reading.



If you haven’t forgotten then you‘re asking about something that you remember. That brings us back to your agenda -> For what reason are you asking me?

The Bible is pretty vague when it comes to detailing the afterlife, funnily enough that's mirrored by the people who are desperate to be a part of it.
It's a simple question that seems to be too difficult for you to answer.

 

[Mancunian]

It's ok to say "I don't know".

 

[Matthias]

The Bible is pretty vague when it comes to detailing the afterlife, funnily enough that's mirrored by the people who are desperate to be a part of it.
It's a simple question that seems to be too difficult for you to answer.

Go read your Bible. That’s what I’m fixing to do. (I’m currently in Acts 2 in my intensive Bible reading plan.)

 

[Matthias]

All the details I have about it are contained in the Bible which you say you’ve read and are re-reading.



If you haven’t forgotten then you‘re asking about something that you remember. That brings us back to your agenda -> For what reason are you asking me?

I‘ve told him why he’s asking me. He didn’t deny it and can’t confirm it, but it’s in his files.

 

[Wrangler]

When something isn't set in stone it's subjective.

More Circular Reasoning. Morality is set in stone, making it objective.

 

[Wrangler]

Was objective morality a thing before Homosapiens appeared on this planet? Is morality a social construct?

Is a circle a thing before Homosapiens appeared on this planet? Are circles a social construct?

We invented our own evolving ideas of morality.

Did we invent our own evolving ideas of circles also?

 

[Mancunian]

I find it incredibly interesting that people would spend their lives believing in, and striving for, something that they have absolutely no clue about.
My motivation/agenda is to find out what individual Christians are expecting.
It's as simple as that.
There's a saying that I always think about...
"If it seems too good to be true, it probably isn't".
On top of that, as I've explained before, how could it be blissful for you to be there with a memory of your earthly life and a knowledge of the billions who will perish?

If faith is the only way to be with God then surely you must know that good people will perish, and some not so good people will prevail.

Yet another reason why morality is subjective.

 

[Mancunian]

Is a circle a thing before Homosapiens appeared on this planet? Are circles a social construct?



Did we invent our own evolving ideas of circles also?

With no sentient beings the concept of what circles are would not have existed. T-rex wasn't interested.

 

[Wrangler]

I find it incredibly interesting that people would spend their lives believing in, and striving for, something that they have absolutely no clue about.

@Mancunian, it’s not clear to me what you are referring to here? Is it what the resurrected life will entail?

If faith is the only way to be with God then surely you must know that good people will perish, and some not so good people will prevail.

Yet another reason why morality is subjective.

You keep making objective statements to defend your subjective conclusion. It’s really hilarious.

With no sentient beings the concept of what circles are would not have existed. T-rex wasn't interested.

And now that the concept of circles exist, does it evolve? @Armour of God, isn’t it amazing how important evolution is to Atheists? The evein try to leverage it regarding concepts.