Brethren,
i believe this pastor is not new to you, excited to watch him in the beginning but as time go by somethings sound not right.
When he ministers his message the scipture he quotes go hand in hand with his message, but the interpretation he gives based on the scripture seems not right.
For example;
Matthew 28:
19. Go then and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
His interpretation to this scripture is, that based on the three mentioned name above, man should be baptized in one name, Jesus.
Since something like this, the Father is in Jesus, and the Son is Jesus, and the Holy Spirit shall come in Jesus name, therefore in Jesus name it is.
So convincing for a start, hence next, Peter did say to baptize in Jesus name, plus, Paul did say that everything should be said and done in Jesus name.
Everything seems to be going spot on, until reflection from the scripture reflects back, written, baptizing them in the name of three separate and distinctive names.
One, in the name of the FATHER.
Two, 'and' of the Son.
Three, 'and' of the Holy Spirit.
Exodus 6:
And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of GOD ALMIGHTY, but by MY name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
Hebrews 1:
1. GOD, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the Prophets,
2. Hath in these last days spoken unto us by HIS Son, whom HE hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also HE made the worlds;
Therefore, we've already obtained GOD's own name for one.
And two, we perceive the Son in the beginning was named the 'Word', and then became flesh and named 'Jesus'.
John 14:
26. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the FATHER will send in My name, He shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance whatsoever I have said unto you.
Now three, we've obtained the name of the Holy Ghost/Spirit, the 'Comforter'.
To conclude, let's put together what Jesus commissioned, what Peter called out parallel to what Paul instructed.
Because of our Lord Jesus Christ and what He have accomplished for salvation preventing condemnation, i baptize you in the name of 'JEHOVAH', and in the name of 'Jesus', and in the name of 'Comforter'.
Overall;
1. Jesus is not the FATHER an individual, but rather the image of the invisible FATHER who art in Heaven and in secret.
2. Jesus Himself an individual, the Word, Lord and God of Heaven in the beginning, whom later became flesh and dwelled among men for a time.
2. Jesus is not the Holy Ghost/Spirit an individual, but rather He the Holy Spirit represents Jesus fully.
So, didn't the above interpretation harmonizes with the scripture and put into context, what do you discern in your spirit?
Thank you and shalom in the name of Lorrd Jesus Christ
i believe this pastor is not new to you, excited to watch him in the beginning but as time go by somethings sound not right.
When he ministers his message the scipture he quotes go hand in hand with his message, but the interpretation he gives based on the scripture seems not right.
For example;
Matthew 28:
19. Go then and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
His interpretation to this scripture is, that based on the three mentioned name above, man should be baptized in one name, Jesus.
Since something like this, the Father is in Jesus, and the Son is Jesus, and the Holy Spirit shall come in Jesus name, therefore in Jesus name it is.
So convincing for a start, hence next, Peter did say to baptize in Jesus name, plus, Paul did say that everything should be said and done in Jesus name.
Everything seems to be going spot on, until reflection from the scripture reflects back, written, baptizing them in the name of three separate and distinctive names.
One, in the name of the FATHER.
Two, 'and' of the Son.
Three, 'and' of the Holy Spirit.
Exodus 6:
And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of GOD ALMIGHTY, but by MY name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
Hebrews 1:
1. GOD, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the Prophets,
2. Hath in these last days spoken unto us by HIS Son, whom HE hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also HE made the worlds;
Therefore, we've already obtained GOD's own name for one.
And two, we perceive the Son in the beginning was named the 'Word', and then became flesh and named 'Jesus'.
John 14:
26. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the FATHER will send in My name, He shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance whatsoever I have said unto you.
Now three, we've obtained the name of the Holy Ghost/Spirit, the 'Comforter'.
To conclude, let's put together what Jesus commissioned, what Peter called out parallel to what Paul instructed.
Because of our Lord Jesus Christ and what He have accomplished for salvation preventing condemnation, i baptize you in the name of 'JEHOVAH', and in the name of 'Jesus', and in the name of 'Comforter'.
Overall;
1. Jesus is not the FATHER an individual, but rather the image of the invisible FATHER who art in Heaven and in secret.
2. Jesus Himself an individual, the Word, Lord and God of Heaven in the beginning, whom later became flesh and dwelled among men for a time.
2. Jesus is not the Holy Ghost/Spirit an individual, but rather He the Holy Spirit represents Jesus fully.
So, didn't the above interpretation harmonizes with the scripture and put into context, what do you discern in your spirit?
Thank you and shalom in the name of Lorrd Jesus Christ
