What do you not understand about your worthless contributions?Uh...okay... have a great thread.![]()
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What do you not understand about your worthless contributions?Uh...okay... have a great thread.![]()
What do you not understand about your worthless contributions?
1. The rebuttal was knowledgeless.Anyone who reads the post where I mentioned your screen name, (which prompted this discussion between you and I), should be able to see that I only mentioned you because you are the OP, and I was attempting to avoid hijacking your thread with what I knew would be an extremely lengthy rebuttal to someone else's extremely lengthy post.
Am I evil for attempting to respect your wishes on which direction you would prefer your thread to go?
As far as my contributions to this thread, I stand by everything I have said, and all the scripture that supports what I have said: if your opinion is that my contributions are worthless, so be it, your opinions are your own and have no relevance to what I believe from and according to the scripture. However, the murders proceeding from your heart and coming forth from your mouth, without cause, are duly noted, (Matthew 15:18-20). The stench of arrogance and pride precedes you.
1. The rebuttal was knowledgeless.
2. It was only a tangent.
3. I just don't like you.
4. You won't even start your own thread. That is how I understand you.
You are some weird Modern Jew, not my brother. And I don't hate you. (removed)Thus you spew the apparent hate proceeding from your heart and exiting out of your mouth, just as the Master says, (again, Matthew 15:18-20), and one of his apostles likewise, based on that same Matthew passage, saying, Whosoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him, (1John 3:15). Do you neither understand nor perceive that murders do indeed proceed from the heart, and come forth from the mouth, and defile a person? Why do you neither believe the Testimony of the Master nor his apostles?
You are some weird Modern Jew, not my brother. And I don't hate you. (removed)
The Highest Lord and Highest King is YHWH.

John 1:1 "In the beginning, it became a word, and a word it became with a God, and the God it became. A word ...."Here we are on page three of your thread and you have still not yet begun your argument(s). Why not just start with John 1:1? Surely you have some sort of argument with the common Trinitarian interpretation and understanding of that passage, correct? Below is the Greek text with links to the lexicons provided at biblehub,com.
Show us all why the following Greek text is theologically incorrect.
John 1:1 Greek Study Bible (Apostolic / Interlinear)
Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.
------------------------------------------------
For future reference:
The following Hebrew text from the Vatican Library is theologically correct.
View attachment 93068
.
John 1:1 "In the beginning, it became a word, and a word it became with a God, and the God it became. A word ...."
The problem is the English not the Greek. Since you are Jew who knows only Hebrew, I suspect you will have some lame rebuttal.
Also notice the article or determiner is indefinite in all ancient languages. Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin.

Logos is any word or unit which informs. It is any word in the Greek language. The name of God is a word for example.Ridiculous. In Biblical Greek the definite article is the only way to make a word emphatic, (and there is no indefinite article). Hebrew is essentially the opposite: proper nouns are already emphatic and therefore do not tolerate the definite article.
"ho logos" (ὁ λόγος) = the Logos, the Word, etc., etc.
The rest of your reinterpretation is mind-boggling: how on earth did you come up with "it became a word"??? You arbitrarily inserted "it" into the statement three times without any textual reason for doing so.
You changed τὸν θεόν into "a God", replacing the definite article, (the), with an indefinite article, (a), that does not exist anywhere in the Greek texts of either the LXX or the N/T, (again, there is no indefinite article in Biblical Greek).
Then you took an anarthous form of θεὸς, (Theos without the article), and inserted the article, (the God it became)!!!
Unbelievable! You have subverted the entire statement in order to make it say nearly the exact opposite of what it actually says!!! And you say that my contributions here in this thread have been worthless???
(Post#41 at the top of this page).
I think now I understand why...
View attachment 93093
.
According to the Blue Letter Bible,You arbitrarily inserted "it" into the statement three times without any textual reason for doing so.
| Inflected: | ἦν |
| Root: | ἦν
|
| Strong's: | G2258 |
| English: | was |
| Code: | V-IXI-3S |
| Long: | Verb - Imperfect (No voice stated) Indicative - 3rd Person Singular |
| Speech: | Verb |
| Tense: | Imperfect |
| Voice: | (No voice stated) |
| Mood: | Indicative |
| Person: | 3rd Person |
| Number: | Singular |
You say that because you are a Jew boy and not a Unitarian, Jew boy.Unbelievable! You have subverted the entire statement in order to make it say nearly the exact opposite of what it actually says!!! And you say that my contributions here in this thread have been worthless???![]()
You say that because you are a Jew boy and not a Unitarian, Jew boy.