justbyfaith
Well-Known Member
If the newer translations did not rely on alternate manuscripts that they are translated from, but used the Textus Receptus, I don't think that I would even have a problem with them. But because they are translated from inferior manuscripts, I do not hold them to be in the same regard (with the same reverence) as any translation that might be translated from the Textus Receptus.
So then, the kjv is an improvement on the earlier translations; but the newer, watered-down, New Age translations are not an improvement on the kjv, because their base is different.
So then, the kjv is an improvement on the earlier translations; but the newer, watered-down, New Age translations are not an improvement on the kjv, because their base is different.