Recent content by GracePeace

You can mock the teaching that those who are in Adam are doomed all you want--call it "an oops", or what ever--but what you can't do is actually address the text, because you know it disagrees with you, and you prefer your own ideas over God's, and God's Word makes you mad, because it isn't your...

If I can achieve the making of the same empty assertion as you, does it mean I'm right? Let's see : "The reason you don't see thing the way I see them is because you're immature." Did it work? Am I right? LOL

LOL! You REALLY need to reread Romans. 1. Anyone who is not "in Christ" is "in Adam", thus condemned to the curse of death which Christ defeated--the Jews aren't going to have a New Heart, but still be cursed sinners in Adam. 2. You want to act as though the two are mutually exclusive, but there...

1a. The Scripture doesn't say Eve was fashioned from Adam's "rib", but came from his "side". 1b. Yeah, when it says we're "in Christ", that is true : the body of Christ, Christ's body and bride, is Christ's body, thus we're in Him by being in His body, His bride. 2. LOL "No, 1 + 1 does not...

You must write off the top of your head every time you write, because you are wrong about everything you assert. Why would you do that? Just uncarefully say things? Say things with uncertainty?

The Gentiles referred to in Romans 11 who are grafted in through faith are honest-to-goodness non-Israel human beings who are cut off from their wild olive trees, and grafted in to the cultivated olive tree. They are not "remnant of Israel Gentiles".

There are two Israels. "Not all Israel is Israel". There is a physical Israel, which is in unbelief, though a remnant thereof has been saved, and then there is another Israel, which is the Israel God promises "all Israel will be saved". Paul says in Galatians 6 "the Israel of God"--in...

You're a troll right?

Paul says Abraham and his two wives, Hagar and Sarah, allegorically refer to the two Covenants (Gal 4:21-31). Does that mean Paul is teaching that Abraham and his wives never existed? LOL Of course not. Complain to Paul, not to @Lizbeth.

LOL What part of "one new man" don't you understand? All of it, I guess.

1. If the "Gentiles" referred to, here, were native to the cultivated tree, Paul would not say they are being grafted in "contrary to nature". he would say "how much more then can these branches be grafted in to their own tree?" 2. Also, again, saying the Gentiles referred to here are the same...

Yep. 1 Co 10, which you cited, makes the comparison.

Israel/Canaan was the promised Land for the Jews; I believe Christ is the antitype, because "being found in Him not having a righteousness of my own from the Law but a righteousness from God based on faith in Christ", or "walking in the spirit", because "this is the promise He has given us, even...

Colossians 2:18 Such a person is puffed up without basis by his unspiritual mind.

He grafted Gentiles into the wild olive tree? LOL Bro, I'm not even going to read the rest of your mess. Why would God need to graft Gentiles into wild olive trees? The wild olive trees REPRESENT Gentile nations! Which "Gentiles"? The same Gentiles who are not the people who broke Covenant...