Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Wow! And what have I "done to the least of these"--of what exactly do you accuse me of?You are in denial. Christ said what you’ve done to the least (of those in the world) you’ve done to me.
In this world all things are made manifest having form and seen. But all who are born of the Spirit are unseen. And as you say, with God all things are possible--donkeys that talk, angels that appear like men, Jesus walking on water, entering through locked doors, and a host of other miracles. Wherein Jesus gave His flesh to the church, saying, "Take, eat, this is My body."I believe Jesus can take on any form he chooses.
After his resurrection he was walking on the shore and met naked Peter, and they all sat down to eat fish.
Of course there is Thomas who also saw him in a flesh body.
There are a lot of characters (Angels) in the OT that show up in the flesh from time to time.
Standing under trees and such.
Mary saw a gardener. He went up to Jerusalem and was witnessed by a lot of people.
But after he ascended I don't believe he needed the flesh in order to "prove" to the disciples he was alive.
With God, All things are possible.
![]()
Yes, by false doctrine more damage is done. As for God's own, some He never knew.You mean.........Like this?:
Ezekiel 13:
6 They have seen vanity and lying divination, saying, The Lord saith: and the Lord hath not sent them: and they have made others to hope that they would confirm the word.
Seems especially true concerning not only what and how you state the "case of context."
But, even more so, concerning "doctrinal" issues as well.
Of the which, is more damage done?
A verse or 2 later states that it is the "seller" of said vanity, and lying divination, that receives the harsher judgement/s! And the "buyers" of the seller/s?
Well? They are receiving their reward/s.
Yet? To God's own?
Ezekiel 13:
20 Wherefore thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I am against your pillows, wherewith ye there hunt the souls to make them fly, and I will tear them from your arms, and will let the souls go, even the souls that ye hunt to make them fly.
21 Your kerchiefs also will I tear, and deliver my people out of your hand, and they shall be no more in your hand to be hunted; and ye shall know that I am the Lord.
"Can" was for you--not me imagining alternative "potential" of scripture--but me hoping reason would be possible. Apparently not.Scott, here is where you fall off the over-spiritualized deep end. "Can" is potential.
When I think about the context of this saying, I don't hear it as an actual eating of flesh and blood.Wherein Jesus gave His flesh to the church, saying, "Take, eat, this is My body."
Scott, in your rush to oppose my point, I believe you invoked the wrong verse. Mt 7:2 reads, Indeed, you will be judged by the very standards to which you hold other people.By that measure, the Temple also is but stone. Matthew 7:2
ziggy they were not busybodies . if they had been in error for reporting those who were gathering sticks ,He wasn't picking up food though, he was picking up sticks.
Busybodies is what they was. And talebearers.
So while they pointed out this man's sin, somehow their own sin escaped their notice.
That is called hypocrisy.
'
Apparently No one was staying in their place.
Hugs
I accuse you of being in denial of the soulful aspect of our existence, of being overly spiritual, of taking verses in Scripture that address worldly, bodily, soulful, fleshy matters - that we are commanded to address - and turning them into what they are not.Wow! And what have I "done to the least of these"--of what exactly do you accuse me of?
That's nice. This is for you ... "can" you answer the question of what set of words would address the world, if not God so loved the world, he gave his only son?"Can" was for you--not me imagining alternative "potential" of scripture--but me hoping reason would be possible. Apparently not.
You believe well!When I think about the context of this saying, I don't hear it as an actual eating of flesh and blood.
That is in opposition to both the OT and the NT where Paul says that we should abstain from blood.
Act 15:29
That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
Jesus tells us himself that he is the bread sent down from heaven. He is the true manna. Not like Moses gave in the wilderness.
That was a physical substance and it could not feed them the way Jesus could.
I believe Jesus was speaking spiritually as in the Word or His words are the bread of life.
And that his blood is his spirit that is poured out on us for the remission of sins.
I see some churches today, that take this literally even believing that by some magician trick they can turn bread into flesh.
And wine into blood.
To me it seems idolatrous.
But eating the words he spoke and drinking in his spirit as living water, this resonates with me. I don't find this offensive at all.
This is my body which is broken... nothing was broken in his physical body.
And this is the feast of the passover and the bread was unleavened, I hear
1Co 5:8
Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
Jesus said something similar when he told to the disciples to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees.
Mat 16:11
How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?
Jos 24:14
Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD.
Cannibalism still exists in the world today. And those traditions of other gods and human sacrifices still go on today.
1Co 10:20
But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.
The bible has a few things to say about wine. It can make one glad when they are mourning. It is a mocker.
Eph 5:18
And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit;
I take what Jesus said about eating his flesh and drinking his blood Spiritually literally but not carnally literally.
When we share the Gospel we are breaking bread. When we are gathered together his Spirit is poured out like on the day of Pentecost.
And I won't take you down the rabbit hole of adrenochrome. Which is in my opinion beyond abomination.
I'm just saying, context matters, which lane do you choose?
I'm staying with the spiritual application rather than the one they observe in some churches today. A lot actually.
Hugs
No, I would have even quoted Matthew 7:2, because of the measure you used (but was being kind, not wanting to publicly ridicule).Scott, in your rush to oppose my point, I believe you invoked the wrong verse. Mt 7:2 reads, Indeed, you will be judged by the very standards to which you hold other people.
I believe you meant to cite John 2:19 Jesus answered them, z“Destroy this temple, and in three days aI will raise it up.” And I'll wait to reply further so you can confirm what verse you're relying on to make your point.
With all of those things you cite, you were suppose to understand them as examples (like bread referring rather to the Word of God). God did that--gave many things in parable having greater spiritual meaning--not me. But you have totally failed, and the result is that you are an accuser.I accuse you of being in denial of the soulful aspect of our existence, of being overly spiritual, of taking verses in Scripture that address worldly, bodily, soulful, fleshy matters - that we are commanded to address - and turning them into what they are not.
The verse 'what you've done to the least of these, you've done to me' is Christ urging us NOT to go up vertically (spiritually) but horizontally to people in this world. And in context what examples does Jesus invoke? Spiritual matters? No. Fleshy, worldly, soulful considerations.
- Exhibit A. Denying it's not possible to go too far spiritually. We don't Sabbath 7 days per week.
- Paul said if we don't work, we shouldn't eat in direct response to people of his time becoming overly spiritual, sitting around doing nothing waiting for the end times.
- 42 For I was starving, and you left Me with no food.
- When I was dry and thirsty, you left Me to struggle with nothing to drink.
- 43 When I was alone as a stranger, you turned away from Me.
- When I was pitifully naked, you left Me unclothed.
- When I was sick, you gave Me no care.
- When I was in prison, you did not comfort Me.
Rightly dividing the word of truth.Exhibit A. Denying it's not possible to go too far spiritually. We don't Sabbath 7 days per week.
Bread is not one of the 6 worldly, soulful items specified, showing you’re taking a fleshy command falsely into a symbolic reference out of context. Good day.With all of those things you cite, you were suppose to understand them as examples (like bread referring rather to the Word of God).
There is nothing out of context in the Word of God of the Word of God. Bread is the context.Bread is not one of the 6 worldly, soulful items specified, showing you’re taking a fleshy command falsely into a symbolic reference out of context. Good day.
"The world is passing away" "lay up your treasures in heaven."...just to name a few.That's nice. This is for you ... "can" you answer the question of what set of words would address the world, if not God so loved the world, he gave his only son?
I can tell ya this ScottA. this "parabolic" example you cited in this post, called "transubstantiation" by catholics, is a real thing! Not done during sacrament/s, nor communion*. Yet in, some might declare, in an over spiritualized state of becoming "born from above!"With all of those things you cite, you were suppose to understand them as examples (like bread referring rather to the Word of God). God did that--gave many things in parable having greater spiritual meaning--not me. But you have totally failed, and the result is that you are an accuser.
And even more than that Ziggy!I think everybody should take a day at least one day a week to refresh their bodies from working or performing services.
Other than the Levitical laws and sacrificing animals for sins, I find the commandments are commonsense.And even more than that Ziggy!
Even the "land!"
An obedience still being done by farmers (or used to be) by not planting a crop on a "parcel of land." A term called "Lying Fallow" for a year, to allow "Sabbath" for the land.
But, because of the "greed factor" and "Dow Chemical's moto:" "Better living through chemistry!" I highly suspect this commandment got tossed by the wayside.