Search results

No Amil claims that, so you are making a straw man argument. Jesus contrasted the people of the kingdom (represented by the wheat) with the people of the wicked one (represented by the tares) (Matt 13:38). The people of the kingdom are in the kingdom of heaven and the people of the wicked one...

What is your point? He's not the God who created all things. But, Jesus is. John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made...

You can't understand what the parable is about without understanding when the rewards are given which is when Jesus returns. He gave no rewards to anyone in 70 AD, so the parable has to be about His future return when He will give rewards to His people. To me, that establishes the context of the...

Where are you getting this from? Why would it say they are resurrected to "damnation" (John 5:28-29) and to "shame and everlasting contempt" if they get a chance to repent after being resurrected? Scripture never teaches such a thing. We (Christians) are all His "brothers" and His sheep...

That's what he thinks he's doing, but it's not reasonable to make the statement that I believe Jesus returns right after Matthew 24:15-21 is fulfilled when I have never said such a thing. If he wants to debate the meaning of that passage, that's fine, but it's not acceptable for him to...

Do you not think we are made up of 3 parts: body, soul and spirit? 1 Thessalonians 5:23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

LOL. Waiting? Do you have no patience? Do you think I have nothing better to do than talk to you? So, it was too much trouble for you to go back and read my posts? Did I not make it clear that I see the Jews being taken captive to all nations, "the times of the Gentiles" and Matthew 24:23-26 as...

Is there something you didn't understand about what I said? I said I have already addressed what you said there multiple times. Go back and read my posts where I addressed what you said there already.

I can't blame him for being confused by that. To many of us, it's obvious that those verses are about the same event and the reason that Luke didn't specifically mention the abomination of desolation spoken about by Daniel is simply because his Gentile audience would not have known anything...

LOL. You have avoided my statements in the past many times, so don't try to tell me what to do. It's up to me what I respond to, not you. It's always funny when I give lots of detail about what I believe and someone thinks it's not enough. Ridiculous. I do have other things to do than this, you...

Good grief. I guess these scriptures are not in your Bible. Daniel 12:2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt. John 5:28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will...

Well, if you're going to just make up lies, then I guess the discussion is over. I, of course, have read the Bible plenty, so that was a ridiculous statement. This is not about who has read the Bible more. That does not determine how well you know what the Bible teaches. The Pharisees read the...

Ezekiel 28:14 You were anointed as a guardian cherub, for so I ordained you. You were on the holy mount of God; you walked among the fiery stones. So, Adam was a guardian cherub, was he? LOL.

You're not differentiating between Jesus as God and Jesus as man and that is causing you to be confused. You've been shown scriptures that teach that He is God and created all things and you just ignore them. He is both fully God and fully man at the same time and is not "a God".

People in Old Testament times had no excuse for not glorifying God as God and being thankful to Him because He made Himself plain to everyone by what He had made (see Romans 1:18-21), so they will be judged by that standard. Have you never read Romans 1 and 2? Please read it so you can learn on...

No, I'm not. You're not reading what I'm saying very carefully. No matter what I say you'll just say "what about this and what about that". I'm saying that all people will be judged based on what they know. Those people you're talking about will be judged by the standard that Paul wrote about...

Not with all of "this", he said, though, right? What he said included him saying "your claim of a 70AD great tribulation is "False". He was saying that in general and not just in relation to Matthew 24. But, you do believe there was a great tribulation in 70 AD, but only believe it is recorded...

Be more clear about what you believe then. I'm trying to get you to address Luke 21:24. Where does the part about Jews being taken prisoners to all nations fit in that 42 months? Wouldn't they be taken captive to all nations after the tribulation in Jerusalem is over? I am not trying to...

What other scripture can you point to that would support the idea that those whose names are not written in the book of life will be cast into the lake of fire at two entirely different times/events instead of all at the same time/event? What? Where is this taught in scripture? Where does...

Don't tell me I'm forgetting something when you don't even know me. I'm not forgetting anything. Those people are judged based on what they knew. There is no other name ever by which anyone in history can be saved except by the name of Jesus (Acts 4:12, John 14:6). There is no forgiveness of...